UFO Disclosure
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
08-10-2015, 07:43 AM
RE: UFO Disclosure
Die bastard thread die die die Big Grin
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes adey67's post
08-10-2015, 08:41 AM
RE: UFO Disclosure
I've never seen any direct or indirect evidence which shows that extraterrestrials are responsible for certain UFO sightings. At most all we can say is we don't know, and if extraterrestrials actually have the technology to stay hidden from us for so long, we probably will never know.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
08-10-2015, 08:46 AM
RE: UFO Disclosure
The problem with "Being able to hide from us...." is that as our technology and understanding of reality around us continues to develope and expand. ........ then the 'Gaps' in which said entities can hide get smaller......

Now, where have I heard/read something like that before.........*Ponders.....*
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 2 users Like Peebothuhul's post
11-10-2015, 08:13 AM
RE: UFO Disclosure
(08-10-2015 02:35 AM)JonMJ33 Wrote:  
(08-10-2015 02:24 AM)EvolutionKills Wrote:  Near as can I can tell, someone with insufficient skepticism and too much credulity went looking for messages in the noise, and connecting dots that weren't there. It's really elaborate numerology attempting to makes sense out of the noise, and assuming a purpose and meaning that is not evidently there.

Check out the Appendix...

Recently a series of radio messages was heard coming from outer space.

But there is nothing establishing that the radio noise was a message, because message infers a source with a motive, neither of which is evidently true.

Perhaps, but then of course you could be wrong.

That is as compelling as Bible codes. Drinking Beverage

Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
[Image: flagstiny%206.gif]
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 2 users Like Chas's post
11-10-2015, 08:34 AM
RE: UFO Disclosure
(08-10-2015 02:35 AM)JonMJ33 Wrote:  
(08-10-2015 02:24 AM)EvolutionKills Wrote:  Near as can I can tell, someone with insufficient skepticism and too much credulity went looking for messages in the noise, and connecting dots that weren't there. It's really elaborate numerology attempting to makes sense out of the noise, and assuming a purpose and meaning that is not evidently there.

Check out the Appendix...

Recently a series of radio messages was heard coming from outer space.

But there is nothing establishing that the radio noise was a message, because message infers a source with a motive, neither of which is evidently true.

Perhaps, but then of course you could be wrong.

Laugh out load

Stuff I haven't seen, so Thumbsup

[Image: ZF1ZJ4M.jpg]
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
15-10-2015, 01:45 AM
RE: UFO Disclosure
I saw this posted on a new thread, but I had to post it here also.

Now this could be interesting indeed!! I suppose we will find out in time.

Quote:They say we actually need to consider the possibility of aliens....

It’s not every day that we have permission to throw "Aliens?" out there in relation to a confounding astronomical discovery - in fact, I don’t think we ever have. But the discovery of a strange pattern of light surrounding a distant star called KIC 8462852 has seen even the most sensible astronomers throw their arms up with a, "Sure, why not?" arguing that the possibility of advanced alien technology can’t reasonably be ignored.-Scientists can’t explain what huge object is blocking the light from this distant star
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
15-10-2015, 01:50 AM
RE: UFO Disclosure
(15-10-2015 01:45 AM)JonMJ33 Wrote:  I saw this posted on a new thread, but I had to post it here also.

Now this could be interesting indeed!! I suppose we will find out in time.

Quote:They say we actually need to consider the possibility of aliens....

It’s not every day that we have permission to throw "Aliens?" out there in relation to a confounding astronomical discovery - in fact, I don’t think we ever have. But the discovery of a strange pattern of light surrounding a distant star called KIC 8462852 has seen even the most sensible astronomers throw their arms up with a, "Sure, why not?" arguing that the possibility of advanced alien technology can’t reasonably be ignored.-Scientists can’t explain what huge object is blocking the light from this distant star


Not yet explainable =/= Therefore extra terrestrials

[Image: E3WvRwZ.gif]
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
15-10-2015, 03:15 AM
RE: UFO Disclosure
(15-10-2015 01:45 AM)JonMJ33 Wrote:  I saw this posted on a new thread, but I had to post it here also.

Now this could be interesting indeed!! I suppose we will find out in time.

Unknown does not equal aliens.

You cannot get from unknown to aliens, no matter how much you want to.

Yes, it's interesting. But, again, it's only possibly aliens in the same way that it's possibly wizards.

"Owl," said Rabbit shortly, "you and I have brains. The others have fluff. If there is any thinking to be done in this Forest - and when I say thinking I mean thinking - you and I must do it."
- A. A. Milne, The House at Pooh Corner
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes Unbeliever's post
02-11-2015, 10:56 PM
RE: UFO Disclosure
(15-10-2015 01:50 AM)EvolutionKills Wrote:  
(15-10-2015 01:45 AM)JonMJ33 Wrote:  I saw this posted on a new thread, but I had to post it here also.

Now this could be interesting indeed!! I suppose we will find out in time.


Not yet explainable =/= Therefore extra terrestrials

Did I say they equate?

Hence the words "interesting," and "I suppose we will find out."
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
02-11-2015, 10:57 PM
RE: UFO Disclosure
(15-10-2015 03:15 AM)Unbeliever Wrote:  
(15-10-2015 01:45 AM)JonMJ33 Wrote:  I saw this posted on a new thread, but I had to post it here also.

Now this could be interesting indeed!! I suppose we will find out in time.

Unknown does not equal aliens.

You cannot get from unknown to aliens, no matter how much you want to.

Yes, it's interesting. But, again, it's only possibly aliens in the same way that it's possibly wizards.

Did I say they equate?

Hence the words "interesting," and "I suppose we will find out."
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply
Forum Jump: