Unanswered questions by Creationists
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
21-02-2013, 09:43 AM
RE: Unanswered questions by Creationists
(20-02-2013 06:04 PM)blasphemilius_VI Wrote:  
(20-02-2013 05:48 PM)Phaedrus Wrote:  Science is based on tentative truths. Induction is logically impossible, but practically fairly reliable. Saying something is true is shorthand for saying, "This is true as best as I can determine, assuming that my perceptions and past experiences are valid and that I don't live in the Matrix or the Truman show or some other untestable philosophical dead-end that precludes further examination."



Modern atheists use the same standard.

so modern atheist just use the coined phrase atheist as a crutch and dont stand by the philosophical definition do to induction being illogical. so is modern atheism philosophically different then is standard atheism? because honestly I didn't know there was a difference... I always thought it was a philosophical standpoint
Atheism is not a position, it is the lack of one.

Evolve
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply

Messages In This Thread
RE: Unanswered questions by Creationists - TheBeardedDude - 21-02-2013 09:43 AM
Forum Jump: