Usual introductions
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
06-08-2012, 04:09 PM
RE: Usual introductions
Hey Graham, I was wondering about the finer points of your theology.

If you don't want to answer these, don't feel obligated.


1) Do you believe in the Doctrine of Free Will (Arminian) or the Doctrine of Election (Calvinist)?

2) What is your belief on Origins? Are you a Young Earth Creationist (YEC), Old Earth Creationist (OEC), Progressive Creationist (PC), Theistic Evolutionist (TE), or an Evolutionary Creationist (EC)?

3) What is your eschatological belief?

4) Do you believe the Bible is 100% literal?

5) Do you believe "inspired" equates to being literally inerrant?

[Image: dog-shaking.gif]
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
06-08-2012, 04:13 PM
RE: Usual introductions
What does eschatological mean. I think you explained once before... something to do with bullshit... or cats... ?

Do you believe expired equates to "I probably shouldn't drink this milk"?
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
06-08-2012, 04:14 PM
RE: Usual introductions
(06-08-2012 04:13 PM)morondog Wrote:  What does eschatological mean. I think you explained once before... something to do with bullshit... or cats... ?

Do you believe expired equates to "I probably shouldn't drink this milk"?

Study of biblical end times.

edit: lol cats?

[Image: dog-shaking.gif]
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
06-08-2012, 04:19 PM
RE: Usual introductions
(06-08-2012 04:14 PM)kingschosen Wrote:  
(06-08-2012 04:13 PM)morondog Wrote:  What does eschatological mean. I think you explained once before... something to do with bullshit... or cats... ?

Do you believe expired equates to "I probably shouldn't drink this milk"?

Study of biblical end times.

edit: lol cats?

biblical end times = eschaton



Oh, and eschaton = bullshit.

Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
[Image: flagstiny%206.gif]
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
06-08-2012, 04:23 PM
RE: Usual introductions
(06-08-2012 04:14 PM)kingschosen Wrote:  edit: lol cats?

es-cat-ological...

[Image: Ceilation.jpg]
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes morondog's post
06-08-2012, 04:25 PM
RE: Usual introductions
(06-08-2012 04:23 PM)morondog Wrote:  
(06-08-2012 04:14 PM)kingschosen Wrote:  edit: lol cats?

es-cat-ological...

[Image: Ceilation.jpg]

rofl

[Image: dog-shaking.gif]
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
06-08-2012, 04:27 PM
RE: Usual introductions
(06-08-2012 04:19 PM)Chas Wrote:  biblical end times = eschaton

So... eschaton = one big bible-burning event?

That won't do much good. It's online, now.

Hitler would have hated the internet.
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
06-08-2012, 04:36 PM
RE: Usual introductions
(06-08-2012 04:27 PM)Red Celt Wrote:  Hitler would have hated the internet.

[Image: CJ_11723.jpg]
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 2 users Like Red Celt's post
06-08-2012, 05:16 PM
RE: Usual introductions
(06-08-2012 04:09 PM)kingschosen Wrote:  3) What is your eschatological belief?

It's scatological.

(06-08-2012 04:09 PM)kingschosen Wrote:  5) Do you believe "inspired" equates to being literally inerrant?

No, but insipid does.

As it was in the beginning is now and ever shall be, world without end. Amen.
And I will show you something different from either
Your shadow at morning striding behind you
Or your shadow at evening rising to meet you;
I will show you fear in a handful of dust.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes GirlyMan's post
07-08-2012, 05:11 AM
RE: Usual introductions
(06-08-2012 11:55 AM)Grazer501 Wrote:  
(05-08-2012 03:44 PM)Bucky Ball Wrote:  Greetings.

When you post your "evidence", you will have to agree, that in order to actually be consistent, that there is, honestly, seriously, as much "evidence" the the Salem Mass. women who were burned at the stake, actually really were witches.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0xv_Iklb1V4

Also, check out the "lying for Jesus" link. The early fathers agreed that's what they did, and it was what they were up to. They admitted it, multiple places, multiple times.

http://www.jesusneverexisted.com/index.html

Unfortunately, the interpretation of the resurrection event, by the followers, is only one small problem, among many.

Except you won't find many (if any) ancient historians who dispute his existence. Classic historian Professor Graeme Clark of the Australian National University has gone on record as saying;

"Frankly, I know of no ancient historian or biblical historian who would have a twinge of doubt about the existence of a Jesus Christ. The documentary evidence is simply over-whelming" (http://www.smh.com.au/news/national/fact...=fullpage)

Richard Dawkins conceded in a debate with John Lennox that a case could be made for Jesus's existence (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J0UIbd0eLxw)

Other videos from historians/professors:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XbFbJrr1-bY
https://publicchristianity.org/library/c...-the-bible - Professor Craig Blomberg (I recommend this one)

There's no point having a discussion about the resurrection if we're still stuck at whether he even existed. From everything I've read, this is simply not something that is disputed by historians studying the period.

You didn't read the link. I'm not disputing there may have been a person Yehsua. What they did with his teaching IS certainly a fabrication, which, if you read the link, they admitted was a lie. And if you're going to have a discussion about the resurrection, you will have to establish beforehand what you will accept. If you do that, you will have to agree the Salem witches were really witches, as there is better evidence for that, by YOUR criteria.

Insufferable know-it-all.Einstein
Those who were seen dancing were thought to be insane by those who could not hear the music - Friedrich Nietzsche
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes Bucky Ball's post
Post Reply
Forum Jump: