WLC debated Sean M. Carroll a few weeks ago on origins and Kalam Argument
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
14-04-2014, 08:32 AM
RE: WLC debated Sean M. Carroll a few weeks ago on origins and Kalam Argument
(12-04-2014 01:04 AM)Taqiyya Mockingbird Wrote:  
(11-04-2014 09:53 PM)Pickup_shonuff Wrote:  [Image: its-ok-youre-just-a-retard.jpg]

Aaaaaaaaaaaaand the best you can do after having your pathetic unsupported assertions utterly destroyed is troll a stupid picture. No surprise.


Drinking Beverage

[Image: il_570xN.467655316_hn4e.jpg]
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
14-04-2014, 09:29 AM
RE: WLC debated Sean M. Carroll a few weeks ago on origins and Kalam Argument
(14-04-2014 08:32 AM)Pickup_shonuff Wrote:  
(12-04-2014 01:04 AM)Taqiyya Mockingbird Wrote:  Aaaaaaaaaaaaand the best you can do after having your pathetic unsupported assertions utterly destroyed is troll a stupid picture. No surprise.


Drinking Beverage

[Image: il_570xN.467655316_hn4e.jpg]

[Image: tmp.jpg]


Fucking moron.

It's Special Pleadings all the way down!


Magic Talking Snakes STFU -- revenantx77


You can't have your special pleading and eat it too. -- WillHop
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
14-04-2014, 09:53 AM
RE: WLC debated Sean M. Carroll a few weeks ago on origins and Kalam Argument
(14-04-2014 09:29 AM)Taqiyya Mockingbird Wrote:  
(14-04-2014 08:32 AM)Pickup_shonuff Wrote:  [Image: il_570xN.467655316_hn4e.jpg]

[Image: tmp.jpg]


Fucking moron.

I can only assume that went over your head, seeing as how you're apparently only capable of attacking straw-men. [Image: jesus-facepalm.jpg]
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
14-04-2014, 10:07 AM
RE: WLC debated Sean M. Carroll a few weeks ago on origins and Kalam Argument
(14-04-2014 09:53 AM)Pickup_shonuff Wrote:  
(14-04-2014 09:29 AM)Taqiyya Mockingbird Wrote:  [Image: tmp.jpg]


Fucking moron.

I can only assume that went over your head, seeing as how you're apparently only capable of attacking straw-men. [Image: jesus-facepalm.jpg]

....demonstrating that you don't have the slightest fucking idea what a straw man is, Congratulations, idiot.

It's Special Pleadings all the way down!


Magic Talking Snakes STFU -- revenantx77


You can't have your special pleading and eat it too. -- WillHop
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
14-04-2014, 01:57 PM
RE: WLC debated Sean M. Carroll a few weeks ago on origins and Kalam Argument
Do you think WLC learned anything from the simple tutoring session that some refer to as the debate ?

There are no debates when it comes to reality vs fantasy. There is only teaching and hope for understanding.

People were watching basic one on one teacher to special needs student interaction.

Insanity - doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes Rahn127's post
14-04-2014, 11:10 PM
RE: WLC debated Sean M. Carroll a few weeks ago on origins and Kalam Argument
(14-04-2014 01:57 PM)Rahn127 Wrote:  Do you think WLC learned anything from the simple tutoring session that some refer to as the debate ?

There are no debates when it comes to reality vs fantasy. There is only teaching and hope for understanding.

People were watching basic one on one teacher to special needs student interaction.

Indeed.

It's Special Pleadings all the way down!


Magic Talking Snakes STFU -- revenantx77


You can't have your special pleading and eat it too. -- WillHop
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
16-04-2014, 09:13 AM
RE: WLC debated Sean M. Carroll a few weeks ago on origins and Kalam Argument
The whole point of "reality vs. fantasy" is the debate over what constitutes the nature of reality and fantasy. To say there is no debate in two opposing propositions "vs." each other is either not well thought out or not well conveyed.

And Taq, I think we got off on the wrong foot. I'd like to understand better where your douchiness comes from?
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
16-04-2014, 06:52 PM
RE: WLC debated Sean M. Carroll a few weeks ago on origins and Kalam Argument
(16-04-2014 09:13 AM)Pickup_shonuff Wrote:  The whole point of "reality vs. fantasy" is the debate over what constitutes the nature of reality and fantasy. To say there is no debate in two opposing propositions "vs." each other is either not well thought out or not well conveyed.

And Taq, I think we got off on the wrong foot. I'd like to understand better where your douchiness comes from?

Go fuck yourself, punkass.

It's Special Pleadings all the way down!


Magic Talking Snakes STFU -- revenantx77


You can't have your special pleading and eat it too. -- WillHop
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
19-04-2014, 05:11 PM
RE: WLC debated Sean M. Carroll a few weeks ago on origins and Kalam Argument
(16-04-2014 06:52 PM)Taqiyya Mockingbird Wrote:  
(16-04-2014 09:13 AM)Pickup_shonuff Wrote:  The whole point of "reality vs. fantasy" is the debate over what constitutes the nature of reality and fantasy. To say there is no debate in two opposing propositions "vs." each other is either not well thought out or not well conveyed.

And Taq, I think we got off on the wrong foot. I'd like to understand better where your douchiness comes from?

Go fuck yourself, punkass.

[Image: 31881085.jpg]
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply
Forum Jump: