Was Earmuffs banned?
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
11-11-2017, 01:55 PM (This post was last modified: 11-11-2017 02:18 PM by GirlyMan.)
RE: Was Earmuffs banned?
(11-11-2017 01:22 PM)Chas Wrote:  
(11-11-2017 11:48 AM)Dom Wrote:  That was not the plan.

OK, libel is acceptable here. Got it. Thumbsup

I'm pretty sure the libel laws don't apply to anonymous virtual online personas. The U.S. laws on it anyway. ... I guess maybe if you were generating income off of it and could demonstrate real damage they might, but that's not the case here. It's not enough to just say "Bob called me a pig fucker!", you have to demonstrate it caused real damage. This is why it's pointless to try and sue satirists. You would know this if you spent less time fucking pigs. Big Grin

#sigh
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes GirlyMan's post
11-11-2017, 01:59 PM
RE: Was Earmuffs banned?
(11-11-2017 01:22 PM)Chas Wrote:  
(11-11-2017 11:48 AM)Dom Wrote:  That was not the plan.

OK, libel is acceptable here. Got it. Thumbsup

You are better than that. First time that you have put words in my mouth that I did not and would not say, and that are not a logical conclusion from what was said.

[Image: dobie.png]Science is the process we've designed to be responsible for generating our best guess as to what the fuck is going on. Girly Man
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
11-11-2017, 02:01 PM
RE: Was Earmuffs banned?
(11-11-2017 12:10 PM)ELK12695 Wrote:  [Image: 8b1.png]

Just as Muffs undoubtedly intended.

Need to think of a witty signature.
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 3 users Like Shai Hulud's post
11-11-2017, 02:03 PM
RE: Was Earmuffs banned?
(11-11-2017 01:59 PM)Dom Wrote:  
(11-11-2017 01:22 PM)Chas Wrote:  OK, libel is acceptable here. Got it. Thumbsup

You are better than that. First time that you have put words in my mouth that I did not and would not say, and that are not a logical conclusion from what was said.

I did not put words in your mouth; it is a direct conclusion of deciding not to ban for libel.

Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
[Image: flagstiny%206.gif]
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
11-11-2017, 02:06 PM
RE: Was Earmuffs banned?
(11-11-2017 02:03 PM)Chas Wrote:  
(11-11-2017 01:59 PM)Dom Wrote:  You are better than that. First time that you have put words in my mouth that I did not and would not say, and that are not a logical conclusion from what was said.

I did not put words in your mouth; it is a direct conclusion of deciding not to ban for libel.

Only if ban was the only disciplinary tool in the box. And I don't decide what is acceptable here anyway. I am not admin.

And I am out of here. I have been posting as me.

When I post as official mod it is this color.

[Image: dobie.png]Science is the process we've designed to be responsible for generating our best guess as to what the fuck is going on. Girly Man
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
11-11-2017, 02:08 PM
RE: Was Earmuffs banned?
(11-11-2017 02:01 PM)Shai Hulud Wrote:  
(11-11-2017 12:10 PM)ELK12695 Wrote:  [Image: 8b1.png]

Just as Muffs undoubtedly intended.

He was a proper cunt, you have to give him that. Smile

#sigh
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes GirlyMan's post
11-11-2017, 02:19 PM
RE: Was Earmuffs banned?
Actually, he was just a socially inept, bitter and vindictive little man who found the one place he could strut his stuff and think he was someone important and intimidating.

"E se non passa la tristezza con altri occhi la guarderĂ²."
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 8 users Like Vera's post
11-11-2017, 02:30 PM
RE: Was Earmuffs banned?
(11-11-2017 02:19 PM)Vera Wrote:  Actually, he was just a socially inept, bitter and vindictive little man who found the one place he could strut his stuff and think he was someone important and intimidating.

That's what I just said. Smile

#sigh
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
11-11-2017, 02:35 PM
RE: Was Earmuffs banned?
(11-11-2017 09:04 AM)Dom Wrote:  1. Mods don't ban anyone except spammers (the Viagra type) and persistent socks. Mods are mostly janitors cleaning up posting messes, vetting new members and responding to complaints.
2. Muffs wasn't banned, his privileges were temporarily limited.
3. Muffs was never asked to post an apology, he did it on his own to mock and further escalate the issue.
4. Muffs did not get a perma ban per se, he decided to leave and asked to have the door closed behind him.

You guys don't pay attention to mods posting to clarify and keep making up scenarios.
As far as I understand it Earmuffs is currently banned. Going to his profile I can see his name has been struck through, I think this indicates a banning.

With regards to item 4, I don't see why the mods banned him, he could have chosen himself not to come back, he didn't need to be banned.

It seems he was only banned because he asked to be banned. Not because the mods decided he needed to be banned against his will.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
11-11-2017, 02:40 PM
RE: Was Earmuffs banned?
(11-11-2017 02:35 PM)Stevil Wrote:  It seems he was only banned because he asked to be banned. Not because the mods decided he needed to be banned against his will.

Suicide by cop. Same thing as Mr. Woof who CuntMuffin loved to heckle. I find that fucking funny as all fuck. Big Grin

#sigh
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes GirlyMan's post
Post Reply
Forum Jump: