Was my response to theist too harsh?
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
30-04-2016, 01:55 PM
RE: Was my response to theist too harsh?
(30-04-2016 11:26 AM)Deesse23 Wrote:  
(30-04-2016 09:20 AM)popsthebuilder Wrote:  Poor diluted hypocrites.



Faith in selfless Unity for Good.

Do you feel better now?
A little.

Faith in selfless Unity for Good.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
30-04-2016, 02:10 PM
RE: Was my response to theist too harsh?
(30-04-2016 09:20 AM)popsthebuilder Wrote:  Poor diluted hypocrites.

Faith in selfless Unity for Good.

Facepalm

I do try to stay well hydrated...

Atheism: it's not just for communists any more!
America July 4 1776 - November 8 2016 RIP
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 2 users Like unfogged's post
30-04-2016, 03:27 PM
RE: Was my response to theist too harsh?
(30-04-2016 01:55 PM)popsthebuilder Wrote:  
(30-04-2016 11:26 AM)Deesse23 Wrote:  Do you feel better now?
A little.

Faith in selfless Unity for Good.

You sound like a broken record.

Ceterum censeo, religionem delendam esse
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
30-04-2016, 07:12 PM
RE: Was my response to theist too harsh?
(30-04-2016 03:27 PM)Deesse23 Wrote:  
(30-04-2016 01:55 PM)popsthebuilder Wrote:  A little.

Faith in selfless Unity for Good.

You sound like a broken record.
So do most of you

Faith in selfless Unity for Good.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
30-04-2016, 07:40 PM
RE: Was my response to theist too harsh?
(30-04-2016 07:12 PM)popsthebuilder Wrote:  
(30-04-2016 03:27 PM)Deesse23 Wrote:  You sound like a broken record.
So do most of you
That's because we have to keep explaining simple basic concepts to you over and over and over and over.

It is held that valour is the chiefest virtue and most dignifies the haver.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes WhiskeyDebates's post
30-04-2016, 08:39 PM
RE: Was my response to theist too harsh?
(30-04-2016 09:20 AM)popsthebuilder Wrote:  Poor diluted hypocrites.



Faith in selfless Unity for Good.

Maybe you mean "deluded?"

Language murderer.

There is no "I" in "team" but there is a broken and mixed up "me."
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
01-05-2016, 12:21 AM
RE: Was my response to theist too harsh?
(30-04-2016 07:12 PM)popsthebuilder Wrote:  
(30-04-2016 03:27 PM)Deesse23 Wrote:  You sound like a broken record.
So do most of you

Faith in selfless Unity for Good.

Looks like your record is still broken.

Ceterum censeo, religionem delendam esse
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 2 users Like Deesse23's post
01-05-2016, 05:48 AM
RE: Was my response to theist too harsh?
(30-04-2016 08:39 PM)TheMrBillShow Wrote:  
(30-04-2016 09:20 AM)popsthebuilder Wrote:  Poor diluted hypocrites.



Faith in selfless Unity for Good.

Maybe you mean "deluded?"

Language murderer.
No I actually meant diluted.

Deluded would have worked too.

Faith in selfless Unity for Good.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
01-05-2016, 09:11 AM
RE: Was my response to theist too harsh?
(01-05-2016 05:48 AM)popsthebuilder Wrote:  
(30-04-2016 08:39 PM)TheMrBillShow Wrote:  Maybe you mean "deluded?"

Language murderer.
No I actually meant diluted.

Deluded would have worked too.

Faith in selfless Unity for Good.

It seems like you have thrown in the towel against us again and ran pops, how many weeks/days till your repeating the same stupid nonsense? Do I have time for a few days vacation?

Maybe I should just copy paste in the future to save time. i mean if your just gonna repeat the same debunked and disproven nonsense it might save time instead of hand typing a unique response that you will ignore and not read anyway.

It is held that valour is the chiefest virtue and most dignifies the haver.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 3 users Like WhiskeyDebates's post
01-05-2016, 10:43 AM
RE: Was my response to theist too harsh?
(29-04-2016 11:05 PM)EvolutionKills Wrote:  
(29-04-2016 09:49 PM)GirlyMan Wrote:  That's an argument for idealism more than materialism. just sayin'

Can't say I'm familiar, could you elaborate?

I'm just trying to drive home the point that pops is continuously misusing the term 'knowledge'. He can be as fucked-in-the-head as he likes, and if he refrained from pretending his unfounded and indemonstrable beliefs where anything but, that would be the end of it. It's his masquerading of his beliefs as knowledge that gets my ire.
How can you not get that personal significance is significance? How can you understand that emotional or worth is the only one worth speaking of? Can you literally repeat circumstances that have emotional consequence or significance for yourself, towards others in a way they would not only understand, but believe? No you can't. Knowledge is only truly knowable via self. All else is not knowledge that I speak of. This cannot be grasped with a materialistic view of existence.

Show me the law that states all is literally physical or material, and I will agree that personal knowledge and the conscious are irrelevant in this utterly materialistic existence.



Faith in selfless Unity for Good.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply
Forum Jump: