We'd better say "no false gods", than "no gods"
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 4 Votes - 1 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
04-10-2016, 12:45 PM
RE: We'd better say "no false gods", than "no gods"
(04-10-2016 12:43 PM)TheInquisition Wrote:  .........
Wow, you are aggressive in posting that! ......
Is it really adequate?
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
04-10-2016, 12:47 PM
RE: We'd better say "no false gods", than "no gods"
(04-10-2016 12:45 PM)theBorg Wrote:  
(04-10-2016 12:43 PM)TheInquisition Wrote:  .........
Wow, you are aggressive in posting that! ......
Is it really adequate?

Very adequate and very aggressive aggressive and wrong person!

Gods derive their power from post-hoc rationalizations. -The Inquisition

Using the supernatural to explain events in your life is a failure of the intellect to comprehend the world around you. -The Inquisition
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
04-10-2016, 12:52 PM
RE: We'd better say "no false gods", than "no gods"
(04-10-2016 12:47 PM)TheInquisition Wrote:  
(04-10-2016 12:45 PM)theBorg Wrote:  Is it really adequate?

Very adequate and very aggressive aggressive and wrong person!
Why so?
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
04-10-2016, 12:53 PM
RE: We'd better say "no false gods", than "no gods"
(04-10-2016 12:52 PM)theBorg Wrote:  
(04-10-2016 12:47 PM)TheInquisition Wrote:  Very adequate and very aggressive aggressive and wrong person!
Why so?

This is ungodly and aggressive questioning, aggressive and wrong person.

Gods derive their power from post-hoc rationalizations. -The Inquisition

Using the supernatural to explain events in your life is a failure of the intellect to comprehend the world around you. -The Inquisition
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
04-10-2016, 12:56 PM
RE: We'd better say "no false gods", than "no gods"
(04-10-2016 12:53 PM)TheInquisition Wrote:  
(04-10-2016 12:52 PM)theBorg Wrote:  Why so?

This is ungodly and aggressive questioning, aggressive and wrong person.

Why? See:


Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
04-10-2016, 01:00 PM
RE: We'd better say "no false gods", than "no gods"
(04-10-2016 12:56 PM)theBorg Wrote:  
(04-10-2016 12:53 PM)TheInquisition Wrote:  This is ungodly and aggressive questioning, aggressive and wrong person.

Why? See:



Because bible says:

Numbers 22:32
The angel of the LORD asked him, "Why have you beaten your donkey these three times? I have come here to oppose you because your path is a reckless one before me.

Gods derive their power from post-hoc rationalizations. -The Inquisition

Using the supernatural to explain events in your life is a failure of the intellect to comprehend the world around you. -The Inquisition
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes TheInquisition's post
04-10-2016, 01:14 PM
RE: We'd better say "no false gods", than "no gods"
(04-10-2016 12:43 PM)TheInquisition Wrote:  
(04-10-2016 12:40 PM)theBorg Wrote:  Good "girl"! Take the lollipop:



Wow, you are aggressive in posting that! You are really wrong aggressive and wrong person!

Hmm, could be just patronising but that, in itself, is insulting.

Tomorrow is precious, don't ruin it by fouling up today.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
04-10-2016, 01:23 PM
RE: We'd better say "no false gods", than "no gods"
(03-10-2016 10:58 PM)Aliza Wrote:  Why does there need to be an 'or else?" clause? We're instructed to establish courts of our own to bring cases like this to a tribunal. When the case is made that Jesus is a homosexual and he's into having sexual relationships with his farm animals, it will be determined that he cannot bring emotional or sexual happiness to a woman. He would be excused from marriage.

What about a micropenis?

There is only one really serious philosophical question, and that is suicide. -Camus
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
04-10-2016, 01:23 PM
RE: We'd better say "no false gods", than "no gods"
(04-10-2016 12:40 PM)theBorg Wrote:  
(04-10-2016 12:36 PM)Jesster Wrote:  ...... Your lack of use of the word F**** ......
Good "girl"! Take the lollipop:



Borgy, when you masturbate, do you fantasize about a Jesus shaped lollipop? Maybe you can almost hear Jesus praising you. "Good girl, Borgy!"
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 2 users Like Aliza's post
04-10-2016, 01:31 PM
RE: We'd better say "no false gods", than "no gods"
(04-10-2016 11:57 AM)theBorg Wrote:  Such belief is aggressive, thus, your atheism is wrong.

Aggression has nothing to do with the rightness or wrongness of a view.

All the actual testable facts that we have about the universe so far point to a universe devoid of supernatural phenomena, with no miracles, no magical invisible beings, and no life after death. Until there is credible evidence for the supernatural, it is reasonable to think that people who believe in the supernatural are indeed delusional.
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 2 users Like Astreja's post
Post Reply
Forum Jump: