We'd better say "no false gods", than "no gods"
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 4 Votes - 1 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
05-10-2016, 08:38 AM
RE: We'd better say "no false gods", than "no gods"
I think we're starting to get under Borgy's skin. Thumbsup
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
05-10-2016, 08:41 AM
RE: We'd better say "no false gods", than "no gods"
(05-10-2016 08:38 AM)Aliza Wrote:  I think we're starting to get under Borgy's skin. Thumbsup
You were always in the heart.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
05-10-2016, 08:45 AM
RE: We'd better say "no false gods", than "no gods"
Borgy doesn't like the idea of the burden of proof being on him. It's probably because he doesn't have a scrap of evidence for his claims. He's squirming now that he's backed into a corner.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 3 users Like Jesster's post
05-10-2016, 08:48 AM
RE: We'd better say "no false gods", than "no gods"
(05-10-2016 08:37 AM)theBorg Wrote:  You still believe in "burden of proof" crap.

As a matter of fact, I accept your burden of proof.

I have been researching the matter for over five years now and I have proven to my own satisfaction that god does not exist.

Help for the living. Hope for the dead. ~ R.G. Ingersoll

Freedom offers opportunity. Opportunity confers responsibility. Responsibility to use the freedom we enjoy wisely, honestly and humanely. ~ Noam Chomsky
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes Fatbaldhobbit's post
05-10-2016, 08:58 AM
RE: We'd better say "no false gods", than "no gods"
(05-10-2016 08:48 AM)Fatbaldhobbit Wrote:  
(05-10-2016 08:37 AM)theBorg Wrote:  You still believe in "burden of proof" crap.

As a matter of fact, I accept your burden of proof.

I have been researching the matter for over five years now and I have proven to my own satisfaction that god does not exist.

Please give us the link to the manuscript.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
05-10-2016, 08:59 AM
RE: We'd better say "no false gods", than "no gods"
(05-10-2016 08:58 AM)theBorg Wrote:  
(05-10-2016 08:48 AM)Fatbaldhobbit Wrote:  As a matter of fact, I accept your burden of proof.

I have been researching the matter for over five years now and I have proven to my own satisfaction that god does not exist.

Please give us the link to the manuscript.

Which manuscript?

Help for the living. Hope for the dead. ~ R.G. Ingersoll

Freedom offers opportunity. Opportunity confers responsibility. Responsibility to use the freedom we enjoy wisely, honestly and humanely. ~ Noam Chomsky
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
05-10-2016, 09:04 AM
RE: We'd better say "no false gods", than "no gods"
(05-10-2016 08:59 AM)Fatbaldhobbit Wrote:  
(05-10-2016 08:58 AM)theBorg Wrote:  Please give us the link to the manuscript.

Which manuscript?

Borgy doesn't understand the difference between proving to yourself and proving to others.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes Aliza's post
05-10-2016, 09:04 AM
RE: We'd better say "no false gods", than "no gods"
(05-10-2016 08:59 AM)Fatbaldhobbit Wrote:  
(05-10-2016 08:58 AM)theBorg Wrote:  Please give us the link to the manuscript.

Which manuscript?
Your "disproof" of the True God is in a manuscript, in a book?
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
05-10-2016, 09:06 AM
RE: We'd better say "no false gods", than "no gods"
(05-10-2016 09:04 AM)Aliza Wrote:  
(05-10-2016 08:59 AM)Fatbaldhobbit Wrote:  Which manuscript?

Borgy doesn't understand the difference between proving to yourself and proving to others.
Why a personal "disproof" can not be shared with us?
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
05-10-2016, 09:10 AM
RE: We'd better say "no false gods", than "no gods"
(05-10-2016 08:37 AM)theBorg Wrote:  
(05-10-2016 08:24 AM)unfogged Wrote:  ..........
What evidence do you have that hell is a real place?
What evidence do you have of the variations in temperature? ......
See: "someone" is not the Truth-Seeker, because he found absolute rest in the atheism. The Truth-Seeker seeks. The atheist still believes in "burden of proof" crap.

Quite the contrary. I do seek the truth which is why I need evidence for claims. The only one with "absolute rest" is the theist who has stopped asking questions because they have accepted something for no good reason.

You do not seek because you believe you have found and yet you can't show any reason why anybody else should believe. If you want me to believe then you have the burden of proof to support your claims. I am the one seeking answers.

What I do note from the above is that you are completely unable to answer the question of how you know that hell is real and how you know that there are cooler levels. You are engaged in wishful thinking. Remember that "True Christians"™ are ordered to always have an explanation for why they believe. The only conclusion I can draw is that you are not a "True Christiian"™.

Atheism: it's not just for communists any more!
America July 4 1776 - November 8 2016 RIP
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 2 users Like unfogged's post
Post Reply
Forum Jump: