We'd better say "no false gods", than "no gods"
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 4 Votes - 1 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
06-10-2016, 12:27 PM
RE: We'd better say "no false gods", than "no gods"
(06-10-2016 12:21 PM)theBorg Wrote:  
(06-10-2016 12:18 PM)Dark Wanderer Wrote:  Or, you know... against the law and common *** sense.
The commandment "do not murder" includes the "do not eat humans", because in the situations where the normal food is absent, one is not allowed to eat humans. One better dies, than becomes a cannibal. Capisce?

Now you're lying, straight up lying. Show the biblical reference that explicilty forbids cannibalism.

Gods derive their power from post-hoc rationalizations. -The Inquisition

Using the supernatural to explain events in your life is a failure of the intellect to comprehend the world around you. -The Inquisition
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
06-10-2016, 12:29 PM
RE: We'd better say "no false gods", than "no gods"
(06-10-2016 12:26 PM)jennybee Wrote:  
(06-10-2016 12:21 PM)theBorg Wrote:  The commandment "do not murder" includes the "do not eat humans", because in the situations where the normal food is absent, one is not allowed to eat humans. One better dies, than becomes a cannibal. Capisce?

But what about in Deuteronomy where God says he will make people eat their kids.....
Please provide the verse number, the chapter number. Thank you.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
06-10-2016, 12:31 PM
RE: We'd better say "no false gods", than "no gods"
(06-10-2016 12:29 PM)theBorg Wrote:  
(06-10-2016 12:26 PM)jennybee Wrote:  But what about in Deuteronomy where God says he will make people eat their kids.....
Please provide the verse number, the chapter number. Thank you.

Lazy fuck. I found that with a few keystrokes.

28:53
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 3 users Like Jesster's post
06-10-2016, 12:34 PM
RE: We'd better say "no false gods", than "no gods"
(06-10-2016 12:29 PM)theBorg Wrote:  
(06-10-2016 12:26 PM)jennybee Wrote:  But what about in Deuteronomy where God says he will make people eat their kids.....
Please provide the verse number, the chapter number. Thank you.

You straight up lie, provide no evidence, then ask for evidence from others.

What a fuck you are.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 2 users Like Dark Wanderer's post
06-10-2016, 12:40 PM
RE: We'd better say "no false gods", than "no gods"
(06-10-2016 12:31 PM)Jesster Wrote:  
(06-10-2016 12:29 PM)theBorg Wrote:  Please provide the verse number, the chapter number. Thank you.

Lazy fuck. I found that with a few keystrokes.

28:53
"Kids", let us read together the historic document. Shall we start?

Quote:Because of the suffering your enemy will inflict on you during the siege, you will eat the fruit of the womb, the flesh of the sons and daughters the Lord your God has given you. ( Deuteronomy 28:53 NIV)

What is "wrong" with that text? Are the atheists adequate readers?
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
06-10-2016, 12:42 PM
RE: We'd better say "no false gods", than "no gods"
(06-10-2016 12:34 PM)Dark Wanderer Wrote:  ..........
What a f*** you are.
If the f-word is nice, as all you think, then why I supposed to be offended?
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
06-10-2016, 12:42 PM
RE: We'd better say "no false gods", than "no gods"
(06-10-2016 12:40 PM)theBorg Wrote:  
(06-10-2016 12:31 PM)Jesster Wrote:  Lazy fuck. I found that with a few keystrokes.

28:53
"Kids", let us read together the historic document. Shall we start?

Quote:Because of the suffering your enemy will inflict on you during the siege, you will eat the fruit of the womb, the flesh of the sons and daughters the Lord your God has given you. ( Deuteronomy 28:53 NIV)

What is "wrong" with that text? Are the atheists adequate readers?

It's a good idea to read the entire passage for proper reading comprehension of said passage. Smartass In previous sentences, God is talking about what he will do if people do not obey him. Deuteronomy is talking about curses for disobedience. God will send plagues and war--which will result in starvation and the eating of children--as a result of God's action.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 2 users Like jennybee's post
06-10-2016, 12:43 PM
RE: We'd better say "no false gods", than "no gods"
(06-10-2016 12:42 PM)theBorg Wrote:  
(06-10-2016 12:34 PM)Dark Wanderer Wrote:  ..........
What a f*** you are.
If the f-word is nice, as all you think, then why I supposed to be offended?

You don't know what I think.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
06-10-2016, 12:44 PM
RE: We'd better say "no false gods", than "no gods"
(06-10-2016 12:40 PM)theBorg Wrote:  
(06-10-2016 12:31 PM)Jesster Wrote:  Lazy fuck. I found that with a few keystrokes.

28:53
"Kids", let us read together the historic document. Shall we start?

Quote:Because of the suffering your enemy will inflict on you during the siege, you will eat the fruit of the womb, the flesh of the sons and daughters the Lord your God has given you. ( Deuteronomy 28:53 NIV)

What is "wrong" with that text? Are the atheists adequate readers?

That is not forbidding cannibalism, it foretelling what's going to happen during a siege.

You're the only one with reading comprehension issues.

I will ask again- Where is the bible verse that EXPLICITLY forbids cannibalism?

Here is the definition of explicit:

Explicit

1.fully and clearly expressed or demonstrated; leaving nothing merely implied; unequivocal:
explicit instructions; an explicit act of violence; explicit language.

2.clearly developed or formulated:
explicit knowledge; explicit belief.

3.definite and unreserved in expression; outspoken:
He was quite explicit as to what he expected us to do for him.

Gods derive their power from post-hoc rationalizations. -The Inquisition

Using the supernatural to explain events in your life is a failure of the intellect to comprehend the world around you. -The Inquisition
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes TheInquisition's post
06-10-2016, 12:45 PM
RE: We'd better say "no false gods", than "no gods"
Borgy didn't censor the FUCK out of my quote this time. Progress!
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 2 users Like Jesster's post
Post Reply
Forum Jump: