We'd better say "no false gods", than "no gods"
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 4 Votes - 1 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
03-10-2016, 04:44 PM
RE: We'd better say "no false gods", than "no gods"
(03-10-2016 09:27 AM)Aliza Wrote:  
(02-10-2016 09:56 PM)theBorg Wrote:  What is the Reality? It is the objective thing, which exists even without our knowledge of its existence.

The Reality can be the "inner" and "outer". The false gods "exist" in inner reality (the humans' fantasies). A god is false, if he does not exist in "outer reality", but is claimed to exist in outer reality. For example the Flying Spaghetti Monster has not created the Universe, despite the jokes of his followers: the True God is not familiar with this name.

The True God is not the false one. And the Reality is the opinion of the True God.
This opinion is the objective Reality for all the people.

Thinking you're smart and actually being smart are two different things. Know the difference.

TheBorg: Demonstrating the asymptopic nature of the Dunning-Kruger effect.

---
Flesh and blood of a dead star, slain in the apocalypse of supernova, resurrected by four billion years of continuous autocatalytic reaction and crowned with the emergent property of sentience in the dream that the universe might one day understand itself.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 3 users Like Paleophyte's post
03-10-2016, 05:21 PM
RE: We'd better say "no false gods", than "no gods"
(03-10-2016 04:44 PM)Paleophyte Wrote:  
(03-10-2016 09:27 AM)Aliza Wrote:  Thinking you're smart and actually being smart are two different things. Know the difference.

TheBorg: Demonstrating the asymptopic nature of the Dunning-Kruger effect.

Normally I don't pounce on misspellings, but this time I have to ask:

Did you mean asymptotic, or asymptomatic?

Because one of those I'd argue with.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes Reltzik's post
03-10-2016, 06:07 PM
RE: We'd better say "no false gods", than "no gods"
wassamater, that math no adding up for you?


Wink
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
03-10-2016, 06:14 PM
RE: We'd better say "no false gods", than "no gods"
(03-10-2016 05:21 PM)Reltzik Wrote:  
(03-10-2016 04:44 PM)Paleophyte Wrote:  TheBorg: Demonstrating the asymptopic nature of the Dunning-Kruger effect.

Normally I don't pounce on misspellings, but this time I have to ask:

Did you mean asymptotic, or asymptomatic?

Because one of those I'd argue with.

And that was after I looked the wretched thing up.

We can only wish that it were asymptomatic. A personal relationship with idiocy if you will.

---
Flesh and blood of a dead star, slain in the apocalypse of supernova, resurrected by four billion years of continuous autocatalytic reaction and crowned with the emergent property of sentience in the dream that the universe might one day understand itself.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
03-10-2016, 07:12 PM
RE: We'd better say "no false gods", than "no gods"
(03-10-2016 01:01 PM)Astreja Wrote:  ............
The results of the challenge:

I gave your god a few extra minutes, just in case it was on its lunch break. The whole time, the pen remained in My peripheral vision and remained stationary (as well as stationery)................
And you are un-biased tester? You even not an agnostic! Perhaps pans and pens are flying around you in the apartment, some are flying in through the window! But you would never tell us this! Otherwise "we" would call for a special ambulance, which only "someone" would see as:


Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
03-10-2016, 07:19 PM
RE: We'd better say "no false gods", than "no gods"
(03-10-2016 03:50 PM)Astreja Wrote:  Ironic that theBorg would post that particular Ghostbusters clip. I've actually met Ray (Dan Aykroyd) and have a wine bottle that he autographed...........
Please give us the photo of this gift.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
03-10-2016, 07:26 PM
RE: We'd better say "no false gods", than "no gods"
(03-10-2016 11:28 AM)theBorg Wrote:  
(03-10-2016 04:56 AM)Bucky Ball Wrote:  ...... Go away.

Following song "reflects" the Feelings of (being pushed away) Jesus Christ:



You presumptuous lying idiot.
You have no clue what the "feelings" of Jesus Christ were.
Get the fuck lost.

Insufferable know-it-all.Einstein God has a plan for us. Please stop screwing it up with your prayers.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
03-10-2016, 07:29 PM
RE: We'd better say "no false gods", than "no gods"
(03-10-2016 04:39 AM)Mathilda Wrote:  
(03-10-2016 04:25 AM)Gloucester Wrote:  Wonder if there is such a thing as theBorg and it is not just a bot.

Well I am wondering this myself. You can create a chat bot to pass the Turing Test, ...........
Yeah, the famous unreachable people are often being mythologized. See:


Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
03-10-2016, 07:33 PM
RE: We'd better say "no false gods", than "no gods"
(03-10-2016 07:26 PM)Bucky Ball Wrote:  ..........
Get *** lost.


Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
03-10-2016, 07:37 PM
RE: We'd better say "no false gods", than "no gods"
Every time you make a post, theBorg, I like to imagine Jesus getting fucked up the ass by Paul. Just for fun!

I'll bet he's getting it in heaven all the time, and I'm pretty sure he's enjoying it.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 5 users Like Aliza's post
Post Reply
Forum Jump: