Were the Jews actually Armenians?
Post Reply
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
09-02-2016, 02:58 PM
RE: Were the Jews actually Armenians?
(09-02-2016 01:18 PM)Deltabravo Wrote:  The first thing anyone studying Near East history should do is to throw away the Bible because it is not history.

By the way Bucky, I studied classics at university so I did study this stuff. That was in 1975. Before I got my doctorate. When were you born?

Show us the genetic proof there were "Aryans" in Ur. Facepalm
and tell us EXACTLY what that means, and how you know it.

Whenever you got your degree in Dot-Connection, it was clearly QUITE some time ago.

"The Aryan race was a racial grouping commonly used in the period of the late 19th century to the mid-20th century to describe peoples of European and Western Asian heritage. It derives from the idea that the original speakers of the Indo-European languages and their descendants up to the present day constitute a distinctive race or subrace of the putative Caucasian race.

While originally meant simply as a neutral ethno-linguistic classification, from the late 19th century onwards the concept of the Aryan race has been used as a form of Scientific racism, a pseudoscience used by proponents of ideologically motivated racism and supremacism such as in doctrines of Nazism and neo-Nazism. Aryanism developed as a racial ideology that claimed that the Aryan race was a master race."

Insufferable know-it-all.Einstein God has a plan for us. Please stop screwing it up with your prayers.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
09-02-2016, 03:17 PM
RE: Were the Jews actually Armenians?
What at all is tantalizing or meaningful about this if true or not?

It's arbitrary distinctions from a historical point that isn't valid. It's even been examined and polled how a majority of Israeli Jews don't believe the bibles historical account because they know that origin is bunk.

"Allow there to be a spectrum in all that you see" - Neil Degrasse Tyson
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
09-02-2016, 03:29 PM
RE: Were the Jews actually Armenians?
(09-02-2016 11:19 AM)Deltabravo Wrote:  I think it is a tantalizing thing to think that the Jewish people were, in fact, Armenians who were proto-Europeans, and, indeed, the Aryan people of Ur. Actually the Bible says this because Abraham came from Ur of the Charldees, which makes him an Aryan from the Sumerian city of Ur.

Here is where Manetho and Josephus said the Jewish people came from:

Manetho on the Hyksos
Manetho, Aegyptiaca., frag. 42, 1.75-79.2

Hyksos king Tutimaeus [0]. In his reign, for what cause I know not, a blast of God smote us; and unexpectedly, from the regions of the East, invaders of obscure race marched in confidence of victory against our land. By main force they easily overpowered the rulers of the land, they then burned our cities ruthlessly, razed to the ground the temples of the gods, and treated all the natives with a cruel hostility, massacring some and leading into slavery the wives and children of others. Finally, they appointed as king one of their number whose name was Salitis. He had his seat at Memphis, levying tribute from Upper and Lower Egypt, and leaving garrisons behind in the most advantageous positions. Above all, he fortified the district to the east, foreseeing that the Assyrians, as they grew stronger, would one day covet and attack his kingdom.

In the Saite [Sethroite] nome he found a city very favorably situated on the east of the Bubastite branch of the Nile, and called Auaris (= Avaris ) after an ancient religious tradition. This place he rebuilt and fortified with massive walls, planting there a garrison of as many as 240,000 heavy-armed men to guard his frontier. Here he would come in summertime, partly to serve out rations and pay his troops, partly to train them carefully in manoeuvres and so strike terror into foreign tribes.

Josephus Flavius quoting passages concerning the Hyksos from Manetho's Aegyptiaca
Josephus Flavius: Against Apion

Book 1, section 73
Under a king of ours named Timaus (Tutimaeus) God became angry with us, I know not how, and there came, after a surprising manner, men of obscure birth from the east, and had the temerity to invade our country, and easily conquered it by force, as we did not do battle against them. After they had subdued our rulers, they burnt down our cities, and destroyed the temples of the gods, and treated the inhabitants most cruelly; killing some and enslaving their wives and their children.

Then they made one of their own king. His name was Salatis [1]; he lived at Memphis, and both the upper and lower regions had to pay tribute to him. He installed garrisons in places that were the most suited for them. His main aim was to make the eastern parts safe, expecting the Assyrians, at the height of their power, to covet his kingdom, and invade it. In the Saite Nome there was a city very proper for this purpose, by the Bubastic arm of the Nile. With regard to a certain theologic notion it was called Avaris. He rebuilt and strengthened this city by surrounding it with walls, and by stationing a large garrison of two hundred and forty thousand armed men there. Salitis came there in the summer, to gather corn in order to pay his soldiers, and to exercise his men, and thus to terrify foreigners.
After a reign of thirteen years, he was followed by one whose name was Beon [2], who ruled for for forty-four years. After him reigned Apachnas [3] for thirty-six years and seven months. After him Apophis [4] was king for sixty-one years, followed by Janins for fifty years and one month. After all these Assis reigned during forty-nine years and two months.
These six were their first kings. They all along waged war against the Egyptians, and wanted to destroy them to the very roots.

"These people, whom we have called kings before, and shepherds too, and their descendants," as he [5] says, "held Egypt for five hundred and eleven years. Then," he says, "the kings of Thebes and the other parts of Egypt rose against the shepherds, and a long and terrible war was fought between them."
He says further, "By a king, named Alisphragmuthosis [6], the shepherds were subdued, and were driven out of the most parts of Egypt and shut up in a place named Avaris, measuring ten thousand acres." Manetho says, "The shepherds had built a wall surrounding this city, which was large and strong, in order to keep all their possessions and plunder in a place of strength.
Tethmosis [7], son of Alisphragmuthosis, attempted to take the city by force and by siege with four hundred and eighty thousand men surrounding it. But he despaired of taking the place by siege, and concluded a treaty with them, that they should leave Egypt, and go, without any harm coming to them, wherever they wished. After the conclusion of the treaty they left with their families and chattels, not fewer than two hundred and forty thousand people, and crossed the desert into Syria. Fearing the Assyrians, who dominated over Asia at that time, they built a city in the country which we now call Judea. It was large enough to contain this great number of men and was called Jerusalem.

Book 1, section 93

I shall quote Manetho again, and what he writes as to the order of the times in this case. He says "After this people or shepherds [8] had left Egypt to go to Jerusalem, Tethmosis [2], who drove them out, was king of Egypt and reigned for twenty five years and four months, and then died; ..."

Book 1, section 227

He [5] writes these words: "Those sent to work in the quarries lived miserably for a long while, and the king was asked to set apart the city Avaris, which the shepherds had left, for their habitation and protection; and he granted them their wish.
According to the ancient mythology, Avaris was Typho's [10] city. But when these men had entered it, and found it suitable for a revolt, they chose a ruler from among the priests of Heliopolis, whose name was Osarsiph [9]. They swore an oath that they would obey him in all things. The first laws he gave them were that they should not worship the Egyptian gods, nor should they abstain from any of the sacred animals that the Egyptians held in the highest esteem, but could kill them, and that they should not ally themselves to any but those that were of their conspiracy.
After making such laws as these, and others contrary to Egyptian customs, he ordered that the many the hands at their service to be employed in building walls around the city and prepare for a war with king Amenophis. He colluded with the other priests, and those that were polluted as well, and sent ambassadors to those shepherds expelled by Tethmosis to Jerusalem, informing them of his own affairs, and of the state of those others that had been treated so shamefully, and desired that they would come united to his assistance in this war against Egypt. He also promised their return to their ancient city and land of Avaris and plentiful support for their people; that he would protect them and fight for them if need be, and that the land would easily be subdued. The shepherds were delighted with his message, and assembled two hundred thousand men. Shortly they arrived at Avaris.

King Amenophis of Egypt, when he heard of their invasion, was perplexed remembering what Amenophis, the son of Papis, had foretold him. He gathered many Egyptians, and deliberated with their leaders, and sent for their sacred animals, above all those worshipped in the temples, and ordered the priests to hide the images of their gods with the utmost care. He also sent his son Sethos, who was also called Ramses, and only five years old, from his father Rhampses to a friend of his. He continued with three hundred thousand of the most warlike Egyptians against the enemy, who met them. But he did not join battle with them, afraid to be fighting against the gods. He turned back and returned to Memphis, where he took Apis and the other sacred animals which he had sent for, and continued to Kush, together with his whole army and masses of Egyptians.
The king of Ethiopia was under an obligation to him and received him, and took care of the masses that were with him, while the land supplied all that was necessary for the men's sustenance. He gave them cities and villages to live in, that was to be from its beginning during those fatally determined thirteen years. He sent his army to guard the borders of Egypt in order to protect King Amenophis. And this is what happened in Kush."

This is some of what the Egyptians tell about the Jews, I omit much for brevity's sake. Manetho continues: "Later Amenophis returned from Kush with a great army, his son Ahampses led another army, and both of them joined battle with the shepherds and the polluted people, and conquered them, and killed a great many of them, and pursued them to the borders of Syria." These and more accounts like them are written by Manetho.
Source: Sorry, I've lost the reference

[0] Tutimaeus: Also Tutimaios, Timaios, perhaps Dedumos? There were two kings of this name during the Second Intermediate Period, Djedneferre and Djedhetepre, variously assigned to either the 13th or the 16th dynasty. Many historians reject the suggestion that Tutimaeus is identical with Dedumos.
[1] Salatis: Salitis, possibly Sheshi
[2] Beon: Yakubber?
[3] Apachnas: Khyan
[4] Apophis: Apepi I
[5] He: Manetho
[6] Alisphragmuthosis: Kamose
[7] Tethmosis: Ahmose
[8] An Egyptian term misunderstood by Flavius: This whole nation was styled Hyksos, that is, Shepherd-kings: for the first syllable Hyk, according to the sacred dialect, denotes a king, as is sos a shepherd; but this according to the ordinary dialect; and of these is compounded Hyksos: but some say that these people were Arabians." Now in another copy it is said that this word does not denote Kings, but, on the contrary, denotes Captive Shepherds, and this on account of the particle Hyk; for that Hyk, with the aspiration, in the Egyptian tongue again denotes Shepherds, and that expressly also; and this to me seems the more probable opinion, and more agreeable to ancient history.
Josephus Flavius,Against Apion, 1,73
[9] Moses: It was also reported that the priest, who ordained their polity and their laws, was by birth of Heliopolis, and his name Osarsiph, from Osyris, who was the god of Heliopolis; but that when he was gone over to these people, his name was changed, and he was called Moses.
[10] Typho: Set


NOTE: Member, Tomasia uses this site to slander other individuals. He then later proclaims it a joke, but not in public.
I will call him a liar and a dog here and now.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
09-02-2016, 03:36 PM
RE: Were the Jews actually Armenians?
(09-02-2016 02:10 PM)dancefortwo Wrote:  Oy vey, Cher is Jewish? I'm verklempt. Blink Talk amongst yourselves. Sadcryface

No, no, no, Cher is not Jewish.

.... Oh, I get it. Armenian. Blush Sorry, my Jewdar went off there for a second.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
09-02-2016, 04:11 PM
RE: Were the Jews actually Armenians?
(09-02-2016 01:15 PM)Deltabravo Wrote:  But Bucky...I presume you are Jewish, and you are studying Judaism...yes?
You accept the Old Testament as historical, and it isn't. It is entirely mythological and the "Jewish" people it portrays are mythological. You should be ashamed of yourself for peddling this stuff on an atheistic forum.

Good news! I am Jewish, and I am studying Judaism.

Bucky approaches Judaism from a secular viewpoint that discounts the notion of a G-d. I approach it as a theist and have learned Judaism from the Jewish standpoint. I have noted that (way) more often than not that Bucky and I agree on the outcome even if we don’t agree on the path that led the Jews to get there. But even then there is still a lot that overlaps.

(09-02-2016 11:58 AM)Deltabravo Wrote:  Somehow, this ancient story of these debauched, feudal people came to be written down and modern Jewish people got hold of the idea that they were the only people who could legitimately claim to have been these ancient barbarians. Why they want to be associated with ancient Jews defies reason, but then so does almost anything to do with religion and claims of descent from Adam and Eve, and god himself.

Perhaps the reason for your perplexity stems from a blatant lack of understanding about what Judaism is and what Jews believe. Maybe if you understood this basic idea that other people also descend from the Jewish forefathers, then you'd appreciate that Jews don't claim exclusivity on biological links to those barbaric ancestors you're kvetching about.

Judaism isn't a biological thing. -In fact, not understanding this basic (very basic!) concept suggests that you don't even grasp the most fundamental building blocks that compose Jewish belief. It's like getting hired as a curator of fine art without understanding primary colors.

(09-02-2016 01:03 PM)Deltabravo Wrote:  The problem is, that if you accept the Old Testament as history, and you are wrong, then what is the real history? If the real history is as set out in more contemporaneous historical works, then the god of the Jews is Horus and the Jews were Armenians...

I got really excited when you said this, but I just got off the phone with the Armenian embassy. As it turns out, regardless of whatever DeltaBravo says on TTA, I still don’t qualify for dual citizenship.

Why is that?
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
09-02-2016, 04:14 PM
RE: Were the Jews actually Armenians?
Jews make cymbals?

[Image: vzrf.jpg]

NOTE: Member, Tomasia uses this site to slander other individuals. He then later proclaims it a joke, but not in public.
I will call him a liar and a dog here and now.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes Banjo's post
09-02-2016, 04:19 PM
RE: Were the Jews actually Armenians?
(09-02-2016 04:11 PM)Aliza Wrote:  Judaism isn't a biological thing. -In fact, not understanding this basic (very basic!) concept suggests that you don't even grasp the most fundamental building blocks that compose Jewish belief. It's like getting hired as a curator of fine art without understanding primary colors.

[Image: fresco.jpg]

There is only one really serious philosophical question, and that is suicide. -Camus
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 3 users Like GirlyMan's post
09-02-2016, 04:55 PM
RE: Were the Jews actually Armenians?
(09-02-2016 12:52 PM)Deltabravo Wrote:  And you go on believing history as set out in the Old Testament, because that is what we in the West have been taught.

No one except fundies believe the OT is actual history; atheists most certainly do not.

Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
[Image: flagstiny%206.gif]
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes Chas's post
Post Reply
Forum Jump: