What is/are not "one" or "many"
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
22-09-2013, 07:22 PM
 
RE: What is/are not "one" or "many"
(22-09-2013 11:40 AM)Bucky Ball Wrote:  
(22-09-2013 10:35 AM)Mike Wrote:  So if we called "one" as 1 then it's no longer different. Consider

The (number) "1" signifies the same concept as the word "one", (or actually the reverse).

Do you accept that uncountable things such as space and time are being called as "one"? For example, when you're hearing someone said "there can be only one space in this universe", do you agree to what he have said? Consider
Quote this message in a reply
22-09-2013, 09:47 PM (This post was last modified: 23-09-2013 12:00 AM by Bucky Ball.)
RE: What is/are not "one" or "many"
(22-09-2013 07:22 PM)Mike Wrote:  
(22-09-2013 11:40 AM)Bucky Ball Wrote:  The (number) "1" signifies the same concept as the word "one", (or actually the reverse).

Do you accept that uncountable things such as space and time are being called as "one"? For example, when you're hearing someone said "there can be only one space in this universe", do you agree to what he have said? Consider

Spacetime is "a" dimension. There may be other dimensions, but the words space-time refers to one idea. Your question is like asking do you accept that "water is one". Spacetime may be quantized in some way, at a very small level, in units, (like molecules of water are).

Insufferable know-it-all.Einstein
Those who were seen dancing were thought to be insane by those who could not hear the music - Friedrich Nietzsche
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
23-09-2013, 01:05 AM
RE: What is/are not "one" or "many"
right, that is why the insistence to mean one as the only one, so the absence of else one, is the reason of evil one then to force else existence
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
23-09-2013, 06:51 AM
RE: What is/are not "one" or "many"
(22-09-2013 09:47 PM)Bucky Ball Wrote:  
(22-09-2013 07:22 PM)Mike Wrote:  Do you accept that uncountable things such as space and time are being called as "one"? For example, when you're hearing someone said "there can be only one space in this universe", do you agree to what he have said? Consider

Spacetime is "a" dimension. There may be other dimensions, but the words space-time refers to one idea. Your question is like asking do you accept that "water is one". Spacetime may be quantized in some way, at a very small level, in units, (like molecules of water are).

Time is a dimension of what? You still have yet to explain where time exists since you know, a while back you were insisting that time was more than a concept and that time really existed. Then remember when you couldn't answer what time was, where i existed. Remember those good ole days.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
23-09-2013, 07:31 AM
RE: What is/are not "one" or "many"
(23-09-2013 06:51 AM)I and I Wrote:  
(22-09-2013 09:47 PM)Bucky Ball Wrote:  Spacetime is "a" dimension. There may be other dimensions, but the words space-time refers to one idea. Your question is like asking do you accept that "water is one". Spacetime may be quantized in some way, at a very small level, in units, (like molecules of water are).

Time is a dimension of what? You still have yet to explain where time exists since you know, a while back you were insisting that time was more than a concept and that time really existed. Then remember when you couldn't answer what time was, where i existed. Remember those good ole days.

Go away. The adults are talking. Tongue

[Image: klingon_zps7e68578a.jpg]
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
24-09-2013, 09:22 AM
 
RE: What is/are not "one" or "many"
(23-09-2013 06:51 AM)I and I Wrote:  
(22-09-2013 09:47 PM)Bucky Ball Wrote:  Spacetime is "a" dimension. There may be other dimensions, but the words space-time refers to one idea. Your question is like asking do you accept that "water is one". Spacetime may be quantized in some way, at a very small level, in units, (like molecules of water are).

Time is a dimension of what? You still have yet to explain where time exists since you know, a while back you were insisting that time was more than a concept and that time really existed. Then remember when you couldn't answer what time was, where i existed. Remember those good ole days.

Kids aren't allowed to play around here. Rolleyes
Quote this message in a reply
24-09-2013, 10:10 AM
RE: What is/are not "one" or "many"
(23-09-2013 06:51 AM)I and I Wrote:  Time is a dimension of what?
Time is a dimension of time.
GPS satellites are evidence of time existing independent of our perception of time.

[Image: 21omssh.jpg]
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
24-09-2013, 11:08 AM
RE: What is/are not "one" or "many"
time is a dimension of living fake realities out of what existence is not yet true

so there is a time for this, for unexisting present

bc it is fake then it is invented life, based on enjoying powerful creations and sense of being to play without having to b of itself really
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
24-09-2013, 12:28 PM
RE: What is/are not "one" or "many"
(24-09-2013 11:08 AM)absols Wrote:  time is a dimension of living fake realities out of what existence is not yet true
Yes, because GPS satellites require nanosecond accuracy of "fake realities" to function.


[Image: h4143DA8F]

[Image: 21omssh.jpg]
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
24-09-2013, 02:15 PM (This post was last modified: 24-09-2013 02:39 PM by absols.)
RE: What is/are not "one" or "many"
(24-09-2013 12:28 PM)LostLocke Wrote:  Yes, because GPS satellites require nanosecond accuracy of "fake realities" to function.


[Image: h4143DA8F]

fake is based on abusing what is known being existing
that is why it become fake, not that it is created or invented

creations are based on reversing facts so the freedom offer to mean smthg else

while what is present so the existing thing is always the free, that is why existence is to individuality
the free is what would realize objective rights is the reason of facts constancy from its present freedom recognizing it, is the possible interaction on the base of same present value, only freedom exist bc only freedom can realize else free existence as present too through the base of freedom common sense

objects realities are always disconnected from being present with other objects, bc each object is the reality of different free relations meaning the same thing, it cant but mean its fact as a whole absolute thing, that is how objective existence is the presence of its source that could b evil powers again by reversing what is truly right objectively present

till now obviously all objective existence sources are known being gods, evil means and ways in truth knowledge abuse, so reality is faked based on cheapest concept of opposites for maximum liberty by possessing present rights as nothing for free superior life means

so till now there is no true existence source shown being present, so speculations about existence even though it is obvious, that it could b only an illusion or subjective, is meant seriously

while all believers know their god being evil one will, since the definition of god is what wont recognize else being present too, nor that it would mean objective existence but as a negative right to do by powerful creators wills

so the issue is what existence is obvious fact while its true source is missing and all possible abuse is making the reasons of what look like present or really alive

when freedom true sense cant b connected with even itself freedom to be connected with else freedom recognitions, it would stay still negatively while being abused as present for smthg else

wat i say are never meant being true, it is meant as a right only
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply
Forum Jump: