Why Must Children Suffer?
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
13-08-2013, 12:57 PM
RE: Why Must Children Suffer?
Quote:I sure can tell you:

Kids feel pain, kids learn from it. A largely logical statement, provided you include the proviso's raised by guitar_nut

Kids feel pain (becuase of god/fairies/whatever masterplan), kids learn from it. An illogical statement...becuase these things don't exist.

It's a farily standard arguement...why beleive in a merciful, loving, fluffy god when he/she is happily allowing 1 child to die every 10 seconds from HIV in Africa? They ain't "learning from thier pain" much becuase they dead. Jesus/Shiva etc is letting them die. Which means he is either not very capable or perhaps (gasp) doens't actually exist.

If you're a thiest (presume so) then you can expect your cognitive dissonance filter to fire up in 3, 2, 1....there you go...start typing more blarney.

Naturalist: Boy, this death sure seems meaningless. What was the point?

Christian: See my post immediately above this one.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
13-08-2013, 12:59 PM
RE: Why Must Children Suffer?
Quote:Once again PJ you kind of miss the point of the argument. Pain is not the problem pointless suffering is. From an evolutionary standpoint yes pain is necessary and indeed there are people who are born without pain receptors (or the transmitters are funky or whatever) who cannot feel pain, they tend to die very young unless they are watched constantly as they don't realise when something is wrong. Pain is a warning system. However if there was a loving personal interventionist God then it does not make sense for there to be pointless suffering ie:5 year old's dying from malnutrition or disease.

Naturalist: I agree with the statement above. Pointless suffering is pointless.

Christian: It isn't pointless. It is a naturalistic mechanism, it is a result of the Adamic fall, it is a temporary blip in the light of eternity, it is an opportunity for others to learn, to ease others' suffering, to witness the gospel, etc.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
13-08-2013, 01:00 PM
RE: Why Must Children Suffer?
(13-08-2013 12:56 PM)PleaseJesus Wrote:  
Quote:When I talk about suffering I am referring to the many, many infants and young children who do not survive to adulthood due to genetic flaws and incurable diseases. Touching a hot stove does indeed teach you a valuable lesson. Dying a slow painful death at the age of five does not. Dying immediately after you're born does not. These deaths make sense in a world subject to the simple and uncaring rules of nature. They do not make sense when you try to find a way for them to coexist with a world created by a loving creator.

Naturalist: So? Death is a part of life, those with genetic flaws and incurable diseases are supposed to die before reproduction. This is a helpful mechanism.

Christian: The five-year-old who goes to Heaven for 1,000,000 years of joyful life will account the suffering and sickness as lightweight:

2 Cor 4: "For momentary, light affliction is producing for us an eternal weight of glory far beyond all comparison, while we look not at the things which are seen, but at the things which are not seen; for the things which are seen are temporal, but the things which are not seen are eternal."

Actually if you read the bible nowhere does it say that children go to heaven by fiat.

John 14:6 Jesus answered, “I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me."

Seems to me that those kids don't get a free pass unless your infallible savior was mistaken.

(31-07-2014 04:37 PM)Luminon Wrote:  America is full of guns, but they're useless, because nobody has the courage to shoot an IRS agent in self-defense
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
13-08-2013, 01:01 PM
RE: Why Must Children Suffer?
Quote:What I'm wondering is why we must suffer you.

Naturalist: Since we are animals with inherent conflicts between us, I'll try to exacerbate them using sarcasm.

Christian: All mankind are brothers and cousins. We suffer for one another in self-sacrifice and love.

Colossians 1: "Now I rejoice in my sufferings for your sake, and in my flesh I do my share on behalf of His body, which is the church, in filling up what is lacking in Christ’s afflictions."
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
13-08-2013, 01:03 PM
RE: Why Must Children Suffer?
Quote:Suffer little children...

... said the catholic priest fumbling with his cassock.

Naturalist: Men are animals and find little respite in trying to deny their animalistic urges.

Christian: The very height of hypocrisy is a so-called Christian priest who harms a child or pre-teen.

Luke 17: "He said to His disciples, 'It is inevitable that stumbling blocks come, but woe to him through whom they come! 2 It would be better for him if a millstone were hung around his neck and he were thrown into the sea, than that he would cause one of these little ones to stumble.'"
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
13-08-2013, 01:06 PM
RE: Why Must Children Suffer?
Quote:Correct which is why you would expect to see children suffer in a Godless universe based on natural law rather than a world crafted by an all loving, caring God.

Also thanks for conceding the evolution debate, now doesn't that feel better?

Naturalist: Correct. Children suffering makes absolute sense in a naturalistic, evolved biosphere. So please continue to let them suffer. Enough with the charity work, the feeding of those who don't work or won't work. Enough with law courts and child protection groups and guardians ad litem. Let them suffer, for it is the evolved way.

Christian: Be consistent. Admit that it is the response of the religious and the concerned to alleviate suffering. Ask yourself, "If my statement above is true about a godless universe, where does my motivation to relieve suffering come from?"
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
13-08-2013, 01:07 PM
RE: Why Must Children Suffer?
Quote:Ok, but don't you also believe that the god you worship stands outside of time? What about the people he (or she) allegedly saves through a "miracle" are you also saying that doesn't happen -- and isn't the point of prayer to.not only kiss god's ass but to ask him to break natural laws to grant your specifiic wish?

What of the people who believe their "prayer" was answered? That god really does love them and broke natural law to intervene on their behalf?

It seems to me if god were perfect, omnipotent and omniscient, he wouldn't want children to suffer endlessly until they died.

Unless of course god is like Mother Theresa and believes that suffering until death is a good thing.

Finally I'm now completely convinced you PJ are completely inane.

Naturalist: I do not understand suffering. It has no point. Neither does death. Nor do I understand what a loving God might do is consistent and has established punishment for sin or natural law or justice or benevolence.

Christian: I understand.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
13-08-2013, 01:11 PM
RE: Why Must Children Suffer?
Quote:Incest is not a “guilt” emotional pain. That would imply that we all want to have sex with our siblings, parents and children, but are only stopped by the guilt associated with it. I really hope that’s not how you personally feel, and I hope you see the obviousness of why what you wrote there was wrong. There actually have been many studies conducted on this involving rats and various other animals. An example of one I can recall showed lab rats raised together. When given the choice of other rats to mate with chose those different than the ones they were littered with. In some cases they sprayed the rats with certain scents, such as a lemon scent so that they associated that sent with their siblings. The rats avoided matting with any rats sprayed with that scent, wither a littermate or not. They even took baby rats from a different litter and put them with the new one. When raised as siblings they had the same response and would not mate with its’ littermates. But when exposed to its’ true biological siblings of which they were not raised with they were equally likely to mate with that sibling as any other non-litter mate, and more so than with its’ false siblings with whom they were raised. The rats obviously did not know that the other rats were really their true siblings or not. It is part of our biology to not see those we were directly raised with as options for mates, and the response to the idea of incest is not “guilt” it is disgust. That response does not come from God’s law or commands; it comes from your DNA and evolution.

There have also been studies on people's attraction to other people, and it has been noted that people tend to be more attracted to a sort of average of the faces the grow up seeing in their community, but when those faces start to more closely resemble siblings the less attraction they experience, even if that person is clearly not their sibling. This show that we base our attraction to those we grow up with, but not if they are too ‘familiar’ growing up.

It is true that pain plays a role in learning about avoiding harmful things. Exercise does not count in this as exercise is a modern concept do to the fact that we don’t live natural lives in the wild and need to get artificial exercise. Exercise would have been an unavoidable reality of live for hunter and gatherer types as it would happen simply trying to find food, water, and defending themselves from predators. The pain of exercising would have been to warn the brain when they may be working the body too hard, endangering there chance of survival the following day.

But as far as everything else you said, it can all be cleared up by God having just made everything perfect in the first place, instead of this bullshit charade that Theist like to make up of needing to suffer in order to enjoy heaven. Just start with it. If “he” makes the rules and laws of physics then just make it work right to began with. That fact that we live in a world that has pain in it, and in fact requires it as biologically beneficial is a sign that there is no God. Pain only make sense outside of a god concept, and if we are ruled by the natural laws of physics and need to have a way to perceive those laws, benefits and risk alike, only then does the existence of pain make sense. It would be pointless to have pain if God has to power to do away with the need for it. After all are ‘people’ expected to have pain in ‘heaven’? Can one still burn their face on a hot stove in heaven, or will fire simply not burn anyone who touches it? If not then why not simply create a reality like that here, now? If “God” is capable of that and chooses not to…or rather chooses to create a world in which you need pain to warn you you make burn yourself, then he is a dick, and no God worth following.

Make there be no pain because there is no burning and you solve both problems. Why not not make food that rots or is poisonous and that can make you sick, or make our bodies not even responsive to such things. But no, your idea of “God” wants us to burn and feel pain because “he” is a sadistic dick. It’s a good thing “he” is not real.

Naturalist: There is no guilt, really, so please do not make posts that ascribe the motivation of guilt, or a lack of guilt, to any human interaction. Further, pain is imperfection, despite the fact that I agree pain is important to evolutionary behavior as a naturalist, so why didn't God make a perfect universe to begin?

Christian: He did.

Romans 5: "Therefore, just as through one man sin entered into the world, and death through sin, and so death spread to all men, because all sinned..."
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
13-08-2013, 01:20 PM
RE: Why Must Children Suffer?
(13-08-2013 12:56 PM)PleaseJesus Wrote:  
Quote:When I talk about suffering I am referring to the many, many infants and young children who do not survive to adulthood due to genetic flaws and incurable diseases. Touching a hot stove does indeed teach you a valuable lesson. Dying a slow painful death at the age of five does not. Dying immediately after you're born does not. These deaths make sense in a world subject to the simple and uncaring rules of nature. They do not make sense when you try to find a way for them to coexist with a world created by a loving creator.

Naturalist: So? Death is a part of life, those with genetic flaws and incurable diseases are supposed to die before reproduction. This is a helpful mechanism.

Christian: The five-year-old who goes to Heaven for 1,000,000 years of joyful life will account the suffering and sickness as lightweight:

2 Cor 4: "For momentary, light affliction is producing for us an eternal weight of glory far beyond all comparison, while we look not at the things which are seen, but at the things which are not seen; for the things which are seen are temporal, but the things which are not seen are eternal."

Well shit, by that logic a teenager could flunk a test in high school and just say, but I'll get straight A's in heaven when I die so let's just make up whatever bullshit makes us happy. Fuck you mom, fuck you teacher…I’m a straight A student in heaven!

Death is a stark and inevitable reality of life. But hey let's all just pretend we don't actually die and everything will be perfect. Isn't that better then dying? Pretending everything is perfect? Of course it is so let's all just pretend we live forever because pretending is better than reality and there for makes it somehow real! Problem solved…

I also want to own a unicorn and have a baby pet dragon while I'm at it! It would be way better to have a unicorn and a baby pet dragon than to not have them so that might as well be real too! And now it is, just because I want to pretend it is, because that's shapes reality.

...
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes Raptor Jesus's post
13-08-2013, 01:27 PM (This post was last modified: 13-08-2013 01:31 PM by I Am.)
RE: Why Must Children Suffer?
(13-08-2013 01:03 PM)PleaseJesus Wrote:  Christian: The criminal is a so-called Christian priest who harms a person.
Fixed
Quote:Luke 17: "He said to His disciples, 'It is inevitable that the pederast Christian priests come, but woe to him in whom they come! 2 It would be better for him if a millstone were hung around his rapist's neck and he were thrown into the sea.'"
Also fixed.

I AM he who is called... cat furniture.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply
Forum Jump: