Why the misconceptions of libertarianism?
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
25-12-2012, 05:54 PM
RE: Why the misconceptions of libertarianism?
Motherfucker goes, "why be nice?" Then the motherfucker whine, "you're not fair!" You know... fuck off. Angel

[Image: klingon_zps7e68578a.jpg]
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 6 users Like houseofcantor's post
25-12-2012, 06:39 PM
Why the misconceptions of libertarianism?
I'd rather have pie.

"All that is necessary for the triumph of Calvinism is that good Atheists do nothing." ~Eric Oh My
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
25-12-2012, 07:33 PM
RE: Why the misconceptions of libertarianism?
(25-12-2012 06:39 PM)Erxomai Wrote:  I'd rather have pie.
Wouldn't you like a slice of this cake?

[Image: 20121226_011345.jpg?t=1356485543]

Behold the power of the force!
[Image: fgYtjtY.gif]
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes FSM_scot's post
25-12-2012, 07:57 PM
RE: Why the misconceptions of libertarianism?



[Image: 3d366d5c-72a0-4228-b835-f404c2970188_zps...1381867723]
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes cheapthrillseaker's post
26-12-2012, 06:23 AM
RE: Why the misconceptions of libertarianism?
because being a libertarian means giving a damn about the society around you and caring for your own asses. The definition of sociopath.
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
28-12-2012, 07:41 AM
RE: Why the misconceptions of libertarianism?
(25-12-2012 04:29 PM)Luminon Wrote:  I like libertarians. They use their intellect (or claim to) and therefore must consider what I say and respond. And in return, Libertarians changed or defined many of my opinions, on minimal salary, import regulations and freezing the housing rents... Basically, it seems to be a combination of upholding the law and personal freedom. But as any other ideology, it is not complete. I like to meet people who think their ideology is complete and to challenge the boundaries of their worldview.

- What about the rights of Earth, nature, biosphere, ecosystems, biodiversity, natural resources and so on? The rights of Earth seem to be the latest evolution of human rights.
If everyone deserves a fair price for their goods/services, what price do we owe the nature? Mind you, a cheap, competitive farming costs 1000 dollars per acre and year and it also depletes the soil. It turns vast areas in China into desert, with sand storms that can be observed all the way to north America. A proper, fair method of farming that is beneficial to the soil costs 5000 dollars per acre/year.
Where are all these hidden costs that we pay for with the ecosystem, health and future generations? Money are not a real representation of value.

I like the quote, "Capitalism without bankrupcy is like religion without hell. It can not work." Very well, but what happens in meantime? How do the people end up? I don't know about any safety net for businessmen honorably defeated in the economic competition. Furthermore, I think Bastiat or Hazlitt says that new inventions throw people out of work only temporarily, then they actually increase employment by new development. But IIRC, he writes there that in some cases, like with British textile workers, this temporary loss of job sent them into poverty for freakin' 40 years!
If there's not even a temporary safety net, where's a permanent one, for the old people?

Anyway, Libertarianism seems to me like a very useful instrument, a cost-benefit analysis in whatever we do. Which is wonderful - but it also does not solve all the problems we have and it shouldn't. It solves mostly the artificial problems created by the big government regulations, nothing more, nothing less. Which is a huge problem in America, apparently. I recommend a video by John Stossel, "Is there anything government can't do?"
Nature is a human?
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes namiloveyou's post
28-12-2012, 07:45 AM
RE: Why the misconceptions of libertarianism?


Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 2 users Like Diablo's post
28-12-2012, 04:21 PM (This post was last modified: 28-12-2012 04:25 PM by FZUMedia.)
RE: Why the misconceptions of libertarianism?
(28-12-2012 07:45 AM)Diablo Wrote:  

Libertarians are not opposed to the government by government's sake, we are opposed to violence- the government just happens to have a monopoly on violence. 'Government' is just a word after all- at the end of the day they are people, and subject to ethical judgement. Somalia's violence is monopolised by gangs primarily. We'd rather have neither.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
29-12-2012, 01:33 AM
RE: Why the misconceptions of libertarianism?
(24-12-2012 09:46 PM)poolboyg88 Wrote:  Hello,

1. Can you post a textbook definition of "Libertarianism".
2. as well as post your interpretation of that definition.

You say "not all of us are X, X, and X" which implies the definition includes those attributes, but isn't necessary.

I know how I understand Libertarianism by the rhetoric of people who call themselves Libertarian, but I'd like to address what you think it means.

For example, Atheism has a very simplistic textbook definition, but many people add additional attributes which could be separate from Atheism. And so it wouldn't be fair or accurate to label all Atheists with the beliefs of those other Atheists, who added additional attributes.
No, these are meant to be common misconceptions of the ideology.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
29-12-2012, 05:58 AM
RE: Why the misconceptions of libertarianism?
(28-12-2012 04:21 PM)FZUMedia Wrote:  
(28-12-2012 07:45 AM)Diablo Wrote:  

Libertarians are not opposed to the government by government's sake, we are opposed to violence- the government just happens to have a monopoly on violence. 'Government' is just a word after all- at the end of the day they are people, and subject to ethical judgement. Somalia's violence is monopolised by gangs primarily. We'd rather have neither.
Then what you want is a complete an utter fantasy. You either have this or you can have cholera.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply
Forum Jump: