Wiki for Whining Retards
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
06-08-2014, 08:48 PM
Wiki for Whining Retards
A true masterpiece in unintentional hilarity!
Apparently taking over rationalwiki isn't enough for the SJWs. Now they have there own wiki, so us cishets can educate ourselves about the oppression faced by mentally fucked up teenages who want to be special.

Paleoliberal • Cultural Nationalist • Zionist • Rightist • Anti-Islam • Neoconservative • Canadian Republican • Equity Feminist

Happily Divorced from the Left
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes Res Publica's post
12-08-2014, 02:41 AM
RE: Wiki for Whining Retards
(06-08-2014 08:48 PM)Res Publica Wrote:  A true masterpiece in unintentional hilarity!
Apparently taking over rationalwiki isn't enough for the SJWs. Now they have there own wiki, so us cishets can educate ourselves about the oppression faced by mentally fucked up teenages who want to be special.

As opposed to Conservapedia? ("The Trustworthy Encyclopedia" Laughat )

[Image: qce9oP7.gif]
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 2 users Like EvolutionKills's post
12-08-2014, 07:49 PM
RE: Wiki for Whining Retards
(12-08-2014 02:41 AM)EvolutionKills Wrote:  
(06-08-2014 08:48 PM)Res Publica Wrote:  A true masterpiece in unintentional hilarity!
Apparently taking over rationalwiki isn't enough for the SJWs. Now they have there own wiki, so us cishets can educate ourselves about the oppression faced by mentally fucked up teenages who want to be special.

As opposed to Conservapedia? ("The Trustworthy Encyclopedia" Laughat )

Conservapedia is essentially the equally bad opposite of SJWiki. On SJWiki they whine about how oppressed women are by men, gays are by straights and "colored people" or "people of color" are by whitey. On Conservapedia they whine about how oppressed men are by women, straights are by gays and whites are by blacks.

It is similar to how SJW and MRA bullshit can be used by either side if you just reverse the genders.

Paleoliberal • Cultural Nationalist • Zionist • Rightist • Anti-Islam • Neoconservative • Canadian Republican • Equity Feminist

Happily Divorced from the Left
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
14-08-2014, 01:22 AM
RE: Wiki for Whining Retards
What is it with you and feminism? The page you linked discusses a fringe group of feminism and then condemns them.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 4 users Like Michael_Tadlock's post
14-08-2014, 02:06 AM
RE: Wiki for Whining Retards
(14-08-2014 01:22 AM)Michael_Tadlock Wrote:  What is it with you and feminism?

From what I've seen many anti-feminists are young men / older boys who have not yet had any real success with girls and who also don't have any sisters. And also don't have any platonic female friends. Most of their social contact is with other boys or men. This means that they are less likely to understand the average woman's life and therefore have no context in which to place feminism. They interpret it as an attack on themselves instead.

They often attribute their lack of success with girls to feminism because they haven't yet realised that they should just get to know women as they would another human being rather than treat them as something they don't understand that somehow needs to be manipulated into giving them sex.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 5 users Like Mathilda's post
14-08-2014, 09:48 AM
RE: Wiki for Whining Retards
(14-08-2014 02:06 AM)Mathilda Wrote:  
(14-08-2014 01:22 AM)Michael_Tadlock Wrote:  What is it with you and feminism?

From what I've seen many anti-feminists are young men / older boys who have not yet had any real success with girls and who also don't have any sisters. And also don't have any platonic female friends. Most of their social contact is with other boys or men. This means that they are less likely to understand the average woman's life and therefore have no context in which to place feminism. They interpret it as an attack on themselves instead.

They often attribute their lack of success with girls to feminism because they haven't yet realised that they should just get to know women as they would another human being rather than treat them as something they don't understand that somehow needs to be manipulated into giving them sex.

What killer ad hominem and strawman combo you have here. You do know me, you probably don't even know my first name, let alone what my interaction with women are like. The sheer arrogance of what you are saying is overwhelming. "Agree with me or you have issues". This is the same attitude the USSR took when they locked dissidents in mental hospitals.

Even if everything you said was true, the points brought up by anti-feminists would still be just a legitimate. Arguments must be judged on their merit, not where they come from.

Paleoliberal • Cultural Nationalist • Zionist • Rightist • Anti-Islam • Neoconservative • Canadian Republican • Equity Feminist

Happily Divorced from the Left
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
14-08-2014, 10:14 AM
RE: Wiki for Whining Retards
(14-08-2014 09:48 AM)Res Publica Wrote:  Arguments must be judged on their merit, not where they come from.

If the person making the argument is trying to convince others of the validity of his opinion rather than fact, as you are, then it is very important to understand the reasons for that opinion.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 4 users Like Mathilda's post
14-08-2014, 10:16 AM
RE: Wiki for Whining Retards
(12-08-2014 02:41 AM)EvolutionKills Wrote:  
(06-08-2014 08:48 PM)Res Publica Wrote:  A true masterpiece in unintentional hilarity!
Apparently taking over rationalwiki isn't enough for the SJWs. Now they have there own wiki, so us cishets can educate ourselves about the oppression faced by mentally fucked up teenages who want to be special.

As opposed to Conservapedia? ("The Trustworthy Encyclopedia" Laughat )

You beat me to it EK. Thumbsup

" Generally speaking, the errors in religion are dangerous; those in philosophy only ridiculous."
David Hume
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes KidCharlemagne1962's post
15-08-2014, 07:31 AM
RE: Wiki for Whining Retards
(12-08-2014 07:49 PM)Res Publica Wrote:  
(12-08-2014 02:41 AM)EvolutionKills Wrote:  As opposed to Conservapedia? ("The Trustworthy Encyclopedia" Laughat )

Conservapedia is essentially the equally bad opposite of SJWiki. On SJWiki they whine about how oppressed women are by men, gays are by straights and "colored people" or "people of color" are by whitey. On Conservapedia they whine about how oppressed men are by women, straights are by gays and whites are by blacks.

It is similar to how SJW and MRA bullshit can be used by either side if you just reverse the genders.

Except that, you know, institutionalized racism and sexism do actually exist. Consider

Also have fun reading the Conservapedia article on atheism! Laughat

[Image: qce9oP7.gif]
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 3 users Like EvolutionKills's post
Post Reply
Forum Jump: