WikiLeaks: Hillary Campaign, Top DNC Officials Colluded Against Sanders
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
22-07-2016, 08:06 PM
WikiLeaks: Hillary Campaign, Top DNC Officials Colluded Against Sanders
New Leak Shows DNC Officials Tried to Destroy Bernie Sanders’ Campaign

Quote:The worst fears of Bernie Sanders’ supporters have been officially confirmed in the latest batch of DNC emails released by WikiLeaks.

On Friday, the whistleblowing website leaked approximately 20,000 emails that were allegedly sent by top Democratic National Committee staffers like chairperson Debbie Wasserman Schultz (who referred to a top Bernie Sanders aide as a “damn liar“) national press secretary Mark Paustenbach, and communications director Luis Miranda. This data dump is “Part One” of a series from WikiLeaks they are calling the “Hillary Leaks,” and Guccifer 2.0 has taken credit for the hack behind this first set of emails from the DNC.

The emails show an unprecedented level of collusion between top party officials and political reporters at establishment newspapers, as well as DNC staffers obviously favoring Hillary Clinton while devising ways to attack Bernie Sanders.

In one email with the subject line “Bernie narrative,” Paustenbach ponders a way to attack the Sanders campaign as “never having their act together” with Miranda, suggesting they plant a narrative in the media that the Vermont senator’s presidential campaign “was a mess.”

Despite Wasserman Schultz repeatedly denied allegations that she was favoring Hillary Clinton in the primary, but WikiLeaks’ emails expose her treating the Sanders campaign as an adversary.

Debbie Wasserman Schultz and her staff contemplate ways to smear Sanders’ position on Israel/Palestine affairs with her communications team in one exchange, with Wasserman Schultz saying “The Israel stuff is disturbing” in reference to Sanders’ platform committee appointees attempting to include language denouncing the occupation of Palestinian territory in the party platform. The email also shows that “HFA” (Hillary for America) fronted the idea of Israel/Palestine as “an ideal issue to marginalize Bernie on,” suggesting that DNC staffers were in communication with the Clinton campaign and cooperating on attack strategies against Sen. Sanders.

Party officials even sunk so low as to devise how to use Bernie’s religious views against him, according to emails analyzed Sam Biddle of The Intercept. In an email with the subject line of “No Shit,” DNC CFO Brad Marshall appears to strategize on how to alienate Sanders from Southern Baptist voters:

It might may no difference, but for KY and WVA can we get someone to ask his belief. Does he believe in a God. He had skated on saying he has a Jewish heritage. I think I read he is an atheist. This could make several points difference with my peeps. My Southern Baptist peeps would draw a big difference between a Jew and an atheist.

Marshall followed up shortly after to add, “It’s these Jesus thing.” DNC CEO Amy Dacey replied with “AMEN.” The email was also send to Miranda and Paustenbach.

Marshall emailed the Intercept after publication of their story to insist he was “probably” talking about a surrogate and not Sanders in this email, and the Intercept has followed up to ask what surrogate he could have meant. Marshall has yet to respond to that request as of this writing.

Article 5, Section 4 of the charter and bylaws of the Democratic Party requires the DNC chair to remain impartial during the primary process, a rule that Schultz seems to have violated in these emails:

In the conduct and management of the affairs and procedures of the Democratic National Committee, particularly as they apply to the preparation and conduct of the Presidential nomination process, the Chairperson shall exercise impartiality and evenhandedness as between the Presidential candidates and campaigns. The Chairperson shall be responsible for ensuring that the national officers and staff of the Democratic National Committee maintain impartiality and evenhandedness during the Democratic Party Presidential nominating process.

Neither Schultz nor any other DNC staffers besides Marshall have commented on the leaks as of this writing. The Democratic National Convention begins this Monday in Philadelphia. US Uncut will provide coverage of the convention throughout the week.


TL;DR: It appears that everyone who claimed Hillary Clinton's campaign and Debbie Wasserman Schultz and the DNC were colluding, were right. WikiLeaks has released 20,000 emails ahead of the convention, showing DNC officials treating Sanders as the enemy, manipulating media and public opinion against him, and even floating the idea of smearing him as "an atheist" in religious states.

Need to think of a witty signature.
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes Shai Hulud's post
22-07-2016, 08:10 PM
RE: WikiLeaks: Hillary Campaign, Top DNC Officials Colluded Against Sanders
Poor Bernie never had a chance. They had her selected before people even started voting. A complete fraud of a primary election cycle. Democrat voters were duped.

"Evil will always triumph over good, because good is dumb." - Lord Dark Helmet
[Image: 25397spaceballs.gif]
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 3 users Like Lord Dark Helmet's post
22-07-2016, 09:18 PM
RE: WikiLeaks: Hillary Campaign, Top DNC Officials Colluded Against Sanders
(22-07-2016 08:10 PM)Lord Dark Helmet Wrote:  Poor Bernie never had a chance. They had her selected before people even started voting. A complete fraud of a primary election cycle. Democrat voters were duped.

To be fair, this is America we're talking about here.
Bernie would have a chance in literally any other OECD country EXCEPT America.
And Monaco. And Singapore.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 4 users Like earmuffs's post
22-07-2016, 09:36 PM
RE: WikiLeaks: Hillary Campaign, Top DNC Officials Colluded Against Sanders
Should have released them right before he was set to endorse her.

'Murican Canadian
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes yakherder's post
22-07-2016, 09:58 PM
RE: WikiLeaks: Hillary Campaign, Top DNC Officials Colluded Against Sanders
(22-07-2016 09:36 PM)yakherder Wrote:  Should have released them right before he was set to endorse her.

He's supposed to speak at the DNC. Maybe he'll withdraw his support? Or maybe he'd support her anyway.


But as if to knock me down, reality came around
And without so much as a mere touch, cut me into little pieces

Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 2 users Like Momsurroundedbyboys's post
22-07-2016, 10:11 PM
RE: WikiLeaks: Hillary Campaign, Top DNC Officials Colluded Against Sanders
They'll probably just pretend like it's all falsified. And in being a consistent skeptic, I certainly couldn't deny the possibility even if it all seems quite reasonable to believe, and not really even a surprise.

'Murican Canadian
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 2 users Like yakherder's post
22-07-2016, 10:24 PM
RE: WikiLeaks: Hillary Campaign, Top DNC Officials Colluded Against Sanders
(22-07-2016 09:58 PM)Momsurroundedbyboys Wrote:  
(22-07-2016 09:36 PM)yakherder Wrote:  Should have released them right before he was set to endorse her.

He's supposed to speak at the DNC. Maybe he'll withdraw his support? Or maybe he'd support her anyway.

Or maybe he'll ask people to "vote your conscience".

He's used to being booed by Democrats.

Big Grin

Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 4 users Like DLJ's post
22-07-2016, 10:39 PM (This post was last modified: 22-07-2016 10:44 PM by Tartarus Sauce.)
RE: WikiLeaks: Hillary Campaign, Top DNC Officials Colluded Against Sanders
(22-07-2016 08:06 PM)Shai Hulud Wrote:  New Leak Shows DNC Officials Tried to Destroy Bernie Sanders’ Campaign

Quote:The worst fears of Bernie Sanders’ supporters have been officially confirmed in the latest batch of DNC emails released by WikiLeaks.

On Friday, the whistleblowing website leaked approximately 20,000 emails that were allegedly sent by top Democratic National Committee staffers like chairperson Debbie Wasserman Schultz (who referred to a top Bernie Sanders aide as a “damn liar“) national press secretary Mark Paustenbach, and communications director Luis Miranda. This data dump is “Part One” of a series from WikiLeaks they are calling the “Hillary Leaks,” and Guccifer 2.0 has taken credit for the hack behind this first set of emails from the DNC.

The emails show an unprecedented level of collusion between top party officials and political reporters at establishment newspapers, as well as DNC staffers obviously favoring Hillary Clinton while devising ways to attack Bernie Sanders.

In one email with the subject line “Bernie narrative,” Paustenbach ponders a way to attack the Sanders campaign as “never having their act together” with Miranda, suggesting they plant a narrative in the media that the Vermont senator’s presidential campaign “was a mess.”

Despite Wasserman Schultz repeatedly denied allegations that she was favoring Hillary Clinton in the primary, but WikiLeaks’ emails expose her treating the Sanders campaign as an adversary.

Debbie Wasserman Schultz and her staff contemplate ways to smear Sanders’ position on Israel/Palestine affairs with her communications team in one exchange, with Wasserman Schultz saying “The Israel stuff is disturbing” in reference to Sanders’ platform committee appointees attempting to include language denouncing the occupation of Palestinian territory in the party platform. The email also shows that “HFA” (Hillary for America) fronted the idea of Israel/Palestine as “an ideal issue to marginalize Bernie on,” suggesting that DNC staffers were in communication with the Clinton campaign and cooperating on attack strategies against Sen. Sanders.

Party officials even sunk so low as to devise how to use Bernie’s religious views against him, according to emails analyzed Sam Biddle of The Intercept. In an email with the subject line of “No Shit,” DNC CFO Brad Marshall appears to strategize on how to alienate Sanders from Southern Baptist voters:

It might may no difference, but for KY and WVA can we get someone to ask his belief. Does he believe in a God. He had skated on saying he has a Jewish heritage. I think I read he is an atheist. This could make several points difference with my peeps. My Southern Baptist peeps would draw a big difference between a Jew and an atheist.

Marshall followed up shortly after to add, “It’s these Jesus thing.” DNC CEO Amy Dacey replied with “AMEN.” The email was also send to Miranda and Paustenbach.

Marshall emailed the Intercept after publication of their story to insist he was “probably” talking about a surrogate and not Sanders in this email, and the Intercept has followed up to ask what surrogate he could have meant. Marshall has yet to respond to that request as of this writing.

Article 5, Section 4 of the charter and bylaws of the Democratic Party requires the DNC chair to remain impartial during the primary process, a rule that Schultz seems to have violated in these emails:

In the conduct and management of the affairs and procedures of the Democratic National Committee, particularly as they apply to the preparation and conduct of the Presidential nomination process, the Chairperson shall exercise impartiality and evenhandedness as between the Presidential candidates and campaigns. The Chairperson shall be responsible for ensuring that the national officers and staff of the Democratic National Committee maintain impartiality and evenhandedness during the Democratic Party Presidential nominating process.

Neither Schultz nor any other DNC staffers besides Marshall have commented on the leaks as of this writing. The Democratic National Convention begins this Monday in Philadelphia. US Uncut will provide coverage of the convention throughout the week.


TL;DR: It appears that everyone who claimed Hillary Clinton's campaign and Debbie Wasserman Schultz and the DNC were colluding, were right. WikiLeaks has released 20,000 emails ahead of the convention, showing DNC officials treating Sanders as the enemy, manipulating media and public opinion against him, and even floating the idea of smearing him as "an atheist" in religious states.

You have a pretty loose definition of collusion. The emails displayed no actual coordination between the Hillary campaign and the DNC, just DNC staff expressing their opinions on the race. It's hardly surprising that they preferred Hillary, that's not exactly an open secret, but there's not any evidence of collusion or vote rigging. Mountains out of a molehill and all that jazz.

Oh and US Uncut is an unapologetic, far-left echo chamber, and I say this as somebody who tends identify as a liberal. They are not a reliable or objective source in any way and have been sounding the alarm bells on every minor bullshit detail they could throughout the election about Clinton conspiracies while slobbering over every word emitted from Sander's mouth like he's the second coming of Christ.

[Image: giphy.gif]
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 2 users Like Tartarus Sauce's post
23-07-2016, 03:59 AM (This post was last modified: 23-07-2016 07:10 AM by Vosur.)
RE: WikiLeaks: Hillary Campaign, Top DNC Officials Colluded Against Sanders
(22-07-2016 10:39 PM)Tartarus Sauce Wrote:  
(22-07-2016 08:06 PM)Shai Hulud Wrote:  New Leak Shows DNC Officials Tried to Destroy Bernie Sanders’ Campaign



TL;DR: It appears that everyone who claimed Hillary Clinton's campaign and Debbie Wasserman Schultz and the DNC were colluding, were right. WikiLeaks has released 20,000 emails ahead of the convention, showing DNC officials treating Sanders as the enemy, manipulating media and public opinion against him, and even floating the idea of smearing him as "an atheist" in religious states.

You have a pretty loose definition of collusion. The emails displayed no actual coordination between the Hillary campaign and the DNC, just DNC staff expressing their opinions on the race. It's hardly surprising that they preferred Hillary, that's not exactly an open secret, but there's not any evidence of collusion or vote rigging. Mountains out of a molehill and all that jazz.

Oh and US Uncut is an unapologetic, far-left echo chamber, and I say this as somebody who tends identify as a liberal. They are not a reliable or objective source in any way and have been sounding the alarm bells on every minor bullshit detail they could throughout the election about Clinton conspiracies while slobbering over every word emitted from Sander's mouth like he's the second coming of Christ.
Would you rather it came from Snopes or the Clinton News Network itself?

http://www.snopes.com/2016/07/22/wikilea...nc-emails/
http://edition.cnn.com/2016/07/22/politi...ks-emails/

The article OP cited points out that the DNC is supposed to be neutral according to its own rules. The leaked e-mails show that they were in the tank for Hillary from the beginning and tried to undermine Bernie every step of the way. You can try to dismiss this as a molehill all you want, the fact is that their lacking impartiality is a legitimate issue.

[Image: 7oDSbD4.gif]
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 3 users Like Vosur's post
23-07-2016, 05:23 AM
RE: WikiLeaks: Hillary Campaign, Top DNC Officials Colluded Against Sanders
(22-07-2016 08:10 PM)Lord Dark Helmet Wrote:  Poor Bernie never had a chance. They had her selected before people even started voting. A complete fraud of a primary election cycle. Democrat voters were duped.

Yeah he "never had a chance".
That must be why he actually won so many states.
Facepalm

The DNC *forced* the people who voted for her to do so.

Fuck

Insufferable know-it-all.Einstein God has a plan for us. Please stop screwing it up with your prayers.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply
Forum Jump: