William Lane Craig vs An Actual Scientist
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
17-04-2014, 06:59 AM
William Lane Craig vs An Actual Scientist
This one is for cjlr. Thumbsup




[Image: E3WvRwZ.gif]
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 2 users Like EvolutionKills's post
17-04-2014, 07:12 AM
RE: William Lane Craig vs An Actual Scientist
3rd time for this debate.

No biggy... just a reminder that there is a search thingumybob.

Tongue

Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes DLJ's post
17-04-2014, 11:24 AM
RE: William Lane Craig vs An Actual Scientist
Yabut, no matter how many times I see this, it warms my cockles.
Craig NEVER answers these specific points.
(That would require a "rework" of *The Schtick*).
Ya have any idea how much time and effort a new schtick would take ?

Insufferable know-it-all.Einstein God has a plan for us. Please stop screwing it up with your prayers.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 3 users Like Bucky Ball's post
17-04-2014, 11:40 AM
RE: William Lane Craig vs An Actual Scientist
Not updating the schtick is kinda religion's thing. {rimtap}
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
17-04-2014, 11:40 AM
RE: William Lane Craig vs An Actual Scientist
(17-04-2014 11:24 AM)Bucky Ball Wrote:  Yabut, no matter how many times I see this, it warms my cockles.
Craig NEVER answers these specific points.
(That would require a "rework" of *The Schtick*).
Ya have any idea how much time and effort a new schtick would take ?

Of course he doesn't - there's no need to. The old schtick still sells.

To idiots and wanna-believers, sure, but why change what already sells?

... this is my signature!
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 2 users Like cjlr's post
Post Reply
Forum Jump: