You have 10 seconds to name ONE contribution to the world made by a woman
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
22-06-2013, 11:34 AM
Re: RE: You have 10 seconds to name ONE contribution to the world made by a woman
(22-06-2013 11:10 AM)MrAttacus Wrote:  Laugh out load

Well...I tried, I suppose. Undecided

Although I'm convinced that he's just a troll, and doesn't really belief what he says; the name 'GothKid' on its own has implications about his character.

I'm sure he can't seriously believe what he says...right?...right?? Confused

You hope that no one could be that ignorant and wonder how they could still function in a civilized society if so.

Sent From My NEO x5....
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
22-06-2013, 11:42 AM
RE: You have 10 seconds to name ONE contribution to the world made by a woman
Just out of curiosity, has his IP been cross-referenced with previous troll accounts?

[Image: giphy.gif]
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
22-06-2013, 11:43 AM
Re: RE: You have 10 seconds to name ONE contribution to the world made by a woman
(22-06-2013 11:32 AM)Atothetheist Wrote:  Are we really entertaining this troll? Usually I would be so far in there, proving him wrong, but his claim is so fucked up that I ain't even trying.


Yo, dipshit Gothkid, if you think women made no controbution to anything, you don't deserve the genes your mom contributed to you.


I think that he's "entertaining" us more, but not in any way that he'd like.

BTW, it took me less than 10 seconds to list one contribution by a woman to the world and it was one of the biggest because without it civilization wouldn't exist. Cool

Sent From My NEO x5....
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
22-06-2013, 11:49 AM
RE: You have 10 seconds to name ONE contribution to the world made by a woman
(22-06-2013 11:43 AM)Stephen Charchuk Wrote:  
(22-06-2013 11:32 AM)Atothetheist Wrote:  Are we really entertaining this troll? Usually I would be so far in there, proving him wrong, but his claim is so fucked up that I ain't even trying.


Yo, dipshit Gothkid, if you think women made no controbution to anything, you don't deserve the genes your mom contributed to you.


I think that he's "entertaining" us more, but not in any way that he'd like.

BTW, it took me less than 10 seconds to list one contribution by a woman to the world and it was one of the biggest because without it civilization wouldn't exist. Cool

A single female human common ancestor from which the species must at some point be descended from; of course! Laugh out load

Let the entertainment continue. Drinking Beverage

"Humans always measure what they see in front of them to what they already know. They will deny anything outside of that. They are shallow lifeforms, so enthralled with superficial appearances that they fail to see the truth."
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
22-06-2013, 11:55 AM (This post was last modified: 22-06-2013 12:05 PM by Stephen Charchuk.)
RE: You have 10 seconds to name ONE contribution to the world made by a woman
All humans living today can trace their ancestry back to one woman who lived around 200,000 years ago called Mitochondrial Eve by scientists. (She was by no means the fitst woman.)

http://science.howstuffworks.com/life/ev...cestor.htm

Sent From My NEO x5....
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
22-06-2013, 11:57 AM
RE: You have 10 seconds to name ONE contribution to the world made by a woman
Thank you Gothkunt!

Thanks to you, this thread has become a celebration of the half of the sky this planet calls Woman.

Sorry you'll never get laid, Gothkunt - but hey, you don't like women anyway. Thumbsup

Thanks again, now fuck off. Drinking Beverage

A new type of thinking is essential if mankind is to survive and move to higher levels. ~ Albert Einstein
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
22-06-2013, 12:03 PM
Re: RE: You have 10 seconds to name ONE contribution to the world made by a woman
(22-06-2013 11:49 AM)MrAttacus Wrote:  A single female human common ancestor from which the species must at some point be descended from; of course! Laugh out load

Let the entertainment continue. Drinking Beverage

No, it was Agriculture. Our common female ancestor goes back LONG before that.

Sent From My NEO x5....
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
22-06-2013, 12:05 PM
RE: You have 10 seconds to name ONE contribution to the world made by a woman
(22-06-2013 11:26 AM)MrAttacus Wrote:  Well I'm not sure how someone just so happening to have fewer children than any unspecified higher amount, because of random biological reasons, is an achievement. Laugh out load

Unless, of course, the mother selectively controlled how many offspring were produced, then, I suppose, that is an achievement...but only if it was certain or very likely that the excess offspring would become a shamefully degenerated atavistic troglodyte...although talking about 'potential' children gets you into the illogical realm of pro-lifer logic...Consider

Well, his mom had x kids (where x ≥ 1). If she'd had y>x kids, then there'd be an additional y-x people who might just end up like GothKid himself (God forbid! Rolleyes ). And since a world with fewer such cuntshits is infinitely preferable to one with more, we can consider that a good thing.

Of course, whether that's an active contribution rather than coincidence depends on whether you believe in free will or not Wink.

(22-06-2013 11:26 AM)MrAttacus Wrote:  ...as for whether most public spheres are still dominated by men, even if that was true, that shouldn't matter for Science because the gender of the scientists that study reality has no bearing on the results; in Science it doesn't matter who the scientists are, as long as it gets done.

Science is just the practice of realizing just what kind of a platonic cave we actually live in and how the thing works and why. Its a practice that is gender-less and inhuman; it could be done by another totally different but equally competent species and it would make no difference.

Oh, agreed. What I was thinking of is not a matter of science but of scientists. Just because Galileo, Newton, Lavoisier, Maxwell et al. are all men doesn't mean anything (and certainly not that men are better at science); for much of history women did not have the opportunity to be scientists. Those contributions were made by men (brilliant men! let's not denigrate their accomplishments) because it was not possible under the circumstances for a woman (of whom there were no doubt intellectual equals of the aforementioned) to have made them.

That's less true now than ever, even if there's still a long way to go.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
22-06-2013, 12:12 PM
RE: You have 10 seconds to name ONE contribution to the world made by a woman
(22-06-2013 06:03 AM)Atothetheist Wrote:  
(15-06-2013 05:29 AM)ELK12695 Wrote:  Porn. Wouldn't be possible without them. Oh, and here's my "Fuck off, that wasn't funny" card.

Actually, I believe gay porn is possible without women.

I thought about that while I typed it, but since I don't watch gay porn, it doesn't hold any relevance towards me or women for that matter.

[Image: 20cad83ad8d757191e2878b0f4bf05a9.png]
"Don't answer that. A rhetorical question."
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
22-06-2013, 12:42 PM
RE: You have 10 seconds to name ONE contribution to the world made by a woman
(22-06-2013 12:03 PM)Stephen Charchuk Wrote:  
(22-06-2013 11:49 AM)MrAttacus Wrote:  A single female human common ancestor from which the species must at some point be descended from; of course! Laugh out load

Let the entertainment continue. Drinking Beverage

No, it was Agriculture. Our common female ancestor goes back LONG before that.

Oh, of course I know that! What do you think I am, a bloody creationist??? Laugh out load

It is true though that there must have been, at some point, a single human female who happened to give birth to a lineage from which everyone alive is descended. Obviously they wouldn't have been the only human female alive then, and would probably have lived 100s of 1000s of years ago.

Just like how there would equally have been many lineages of humans that died out completely and even different species of 'humans.' Its mind-blowing to think that if any slight thing had happened differently in the lives of those ancestors, struggling to survive, so close to extinction so many times, then no one today might ever have existed or any kind of civilization at all. You have to wonder; if there really was a deity that cared about our random species at all, what the hell was it thinking during all this? That fact on its own easily refutes any kind of theism from the outset.

Its also mind-blowing that this troll of a thread could have been salvaged to such intellectual, philosophical levels at all; but maybe that just shows how ignorant and naive the OP really is to underestimate this forum into thinking we could so easily be trolled by his simpleton, and really quite shameful for a troll, efforts, and not be able to turn it around into a legitimately intellectual discussion; without him, of course.

Lets all applaud him on making this triumph possible, and hooray for women. Clap

Well, I guess he got the kind of attention he wanted. Laughat

Drinking Beverage

(Yeah, I could do this all day Big Grin)

"Humans always measure what they see in front of them to what they already know. They will deny anything outside of that. They are shallow lifeforms, so enthralled with superficial appearances that they fail to see the truth."
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply
Forum Jump: