(29-11-2012 01:09 AM)chandrashakti Wrote: Vosur and Phaedrus, let me get this straight... Science has a continually expanding front of what can be proved. Yet, if a concept has not been 100% proved by the current state of scientific understanding it is irrelevant (to you). Therefore I must justify my acceptance of the possibilities that theoretical physics and that holy grail unified field theory both seem to necessitate simply because they are not CURRENTLY proved!?!??
Great, another straw man. Never have I said that a concept that has not fully been proven by science is irrelevant. Do you know what a hypothesis is? Exactly. What I'm doing is criticizing you for claiming that science supports your absurd belief. I have challenged you to provide evidence for this claim and what you did was the exact opposite, because your own source says that there is no observational or experimental evidence pointing towards the existence of many other dimensions. I respect your right to believe whatever nonsense you want, but don't expect me to keep quiet when you assert that it is supported by science when it clearly isn't.
(29-11-2012 01:09 AM)chandrashakti Wrote: There is no cognative dissonence for me in accepting those currently theoretical explainations of otherwise inexplicable experiences.
What are these "inexplicable experiences" supposed to be? And what makes you think that the only explanation for them is the existence higher dimensions?