im contristati (im sorry)
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
19-08-2014, 07:17 AM
RE: im contristati (im sorry)
(18-08-2014 11:10 PM)DLJ Wrote:  He will go away if no one pays him any attention.

Or if he gets the boot... Ya know... like... as in that dusty ol' banhammer... It got a lil' test swing the other day, and this guy is waaaaaaaaaaay creepier than HBL. All those in favour?

We'll love you just the way you are
If you're perfect -- Alanis Morissette
(06-02-2014 03:47 PM)Momsurroundedbyboys Wrote:  And I'm giving myself a conclusion again from all the facepalming.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 3 users Like morondog's post
19-08-2014, 07:21 AM
RE: im contristati (im sorry)
(19-08-2014 07:17 AM)morondog Wrote:  
(18-08-2014 11:10 PM)DLJ Wrote:  He will go away if no one pays him any attention.

Or if he gets the boot... Ya know... like... as in that dusty ol' banhammer... It got a lil' test swing the other day, and this guy is waaaaaaaaaaay creepier than HBL. All those in favour?

Actually... no. I'm not.

No lesson will be learned with that.

Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
19-08-2014, 07:24 AM
RE: im contristati (im sorry)
Op is a smelly poo head

Saints live in flames; wise men, next to them.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes SunnyD1's post
19-08-2014, 07:36 AM
RE: im contristati (im sorry)
(19-08-2014 07:21 AM)DLJ Wrote:  
(19-08-2014 07:17 AM)morondog Wrote:  Or if he gets the boot... Ya know... like... as in that dusty ol' banhammer... It got a lil' test swing the other day, and this guy is waaaaaaaaaaay creepier than HBL. All those in favour?

Actually... no. I'm not.

No lesson will be learned with that.

The rules refer to deliberate and pre-meditated disruption; I suppose a psychologically unstable drug addict cannot be considered either of those.

So there's that technicality.

... this is my signature!
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
19-08-2014, 07:41 AM
RE: im contristati (im sorry)
(19-08-2014 07:36 AM)cjlr Wrote:  ...
The rules refer to deliberate and pre-meditated disruption; I suppose a psychologically unstable drug addict cannot be considered either of those.

So there's that technicality.

Well, quite.

This one is debilitated and pre-medicated.

Angel

Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
19-08-2014, 07:44 AM (This post was last modified: 19-08-2014 07:48 AM by Deidre32.)
RE: im contristati (im sorry)
Aside from WC, my thought to banning is that it is essential if the person meets the following criteria: are they using the site as their personal sand box for their own agenda? The member is on the site for no other other purpose but that. That's when I think banning someone is a good idea. And banning the IP, not just the account.

Be true to yourself. Heart
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
19-08-2014, 07:45 AM
RE: im contristati (im sorry)
(19-08-2014 07:41 AM)DLJ Wrote:  
(19-08-2014 07:36 AM)cjlr Wrote:  ...
The rules refer to deliberate and pre-meditated disruption; I suppose a psychologically unstable drug addict cannot be considered either of those.

So there's that technicality.

Well, quite.

This one is debilitated and pre-medicated.

Angel

Just so.

... this is my signature!
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
19-08-2014, 08:02 AM
RE: im contristati (im sorry)
(19-08-2014 07:21 AM)DLJ Wrote:  
(19-08-2014 07:17 AM)morondog Wrote:  Or if he gets the boot... Ya know... like... as in that dusty ol' banhammer... It got a lil' test swing the other day, and this guy is waaaaaaaaaaay creepier than HBL. All those in favour?

Actually... no. I'm not.

No lesson will be learned with that.

When did lessons learned become a requirement? Consider

Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
[Image: flagstiny%206.gif]
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes Chas's post
19-08-2014, 08:04 AM
RE: im contristati (im sorry)
(19-08-2014 07:36 AM)cjlr Wrote:  
(19-08-2014 07:21 AM)DLJ Wrote:  Actually... no. I'm not.

No lesson will be learned with that.

The rules refer to deliberate and pre-meditated disruption; I suppose a psychologically unstable drug addict cannot be considered either of those.

So there's that technicality.

And that's a bullshit technicality. Just sayin'. Drinking Beverage

Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
[Image: flagstiny%206.gif]
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
19-08-2014, 08:04 AM
RE: im contristati (im sorry)
(19-08-2014 07:41 AM)DLJ Wrote:  
(19-08-2014 07:36 AM)cjlr Wrote:  ...
The rules refer to deliberate and pre-meditated disruption; I suppose a psychologically unstable drug addict cannot be considered either of those.

So there's that technicality.

Well, quite.

This one is debilitated and pre-medicated.

Angel

So what? The effect is the same.

Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
[Image: flagstiny%206.gif]
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply
Forum Jump: