[split] Chippy vs the World
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
02-11-2013, 07:58 PM
RE: [split] Chippy vs the World
(02-11-2013 07:52 PM)GirlyMan Wrote:  
(02-11-2013 07:42 PM)Chippy Wrote:  Indeed and I don't have BPD.

You don't get to make that call, we do. And while you're sharp as a tack you come across as a raving asshole. Fix that and you'll be a valuable member of this community. Otherwise you'll just be another raving asshole who happened upon our little bar at the end of the interwebz.

I am honestly happy to be the raving asshole. It gives a certain liberty that the alternative denies. Take it or leave it. Also some people enjoy my vitriolic posts so why should I disregard their preferences.
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
02-11-2013, 07:58 PM
RE: [split] Chippy vs the World
(02-11-2013 07:53 PM)Bucky Ball Wrote:  
(02-11-2013 07:44 PM)Momsurroundedbyboys Wrote:  I want some popcorn.

Me too. Today the world, tomorrow the universe. Tongue
I'ma gonna drink again. Our mid-term grades were just posted, and I was sweating my Physics midterm. There were two extra points, and I got a 102 %. Fancy that. Now I'm REALLY gonna need a cure for hangover ! Woohooo !

Awesome Bucky! So proud of you!
Hug


God is a concept by which we measure our pain -- John Lennon

Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
02-11-2013, 08:00 PM
RE: [split] Chippy vs the World
(02-11-2013 07:58 PM)Chippy Wrote:  
(02-11-2013 07:52 PM)GirlyMan Wrote:  You don't get to make that call, we do. And while you're sharp as a tack you come across as a raving asshole. Fix that and you'll be a valuable member of this community. Otherwise you'll just be another raving asshole who happened upon our little bar at the end of the interwebz.

I am honestly happy to be the raving asshole. It gives a certain liberty that the alternative denies. Take it or leave it. Also some people enjoy my vitriolic posts so why should I disregard their preferences.

You just explained so much about yourself. Good to know.


God is a concept by which we measure our pain -- John Lennon

Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes Momsurroundedbyboys's post
02-11-2013, 08:04 PM
RE: [split] Chippy vs the World
(02-11-2013 07:58 PM)Chippy Wrote:  
(02-11-2013 07:52 PM)GirlyMan Wrote:  You don't get to make that call, we do. And while you're sharp as a tack you come across as a raving asshole. Fix that and you'll be a valuable member of this community. Otherwise you'll just be another raving asshole who happened upon our little bar at the end of the interwebz.

I am honestly happy to be the raving asshole. It gives a certain liberty that the alternative denies. Take it or leave it. Also some people enjoy my vitriolic posts so why should I disregard their preferences.

And I am honestly happy to just ignore your arrogant ass. ... Fucking arrogant prick ain't got nothing to say Girly don't already know anyway.

As it was in the beginning is now and ever shall be, world without end. Amen.
And I will show you something different from either
Your shadow at morning striding behind you
Or your shadow at evening rising to meet you;
I will show you fear in a handful of dust.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
02-11-2013, 08:22 PM (This post was last modified: 02-11-2013 08:28 PM by cheapthrillseaker.)
RE: [split] Chippy vs the World
(02-11-2013 07:42 PM)Chippy Wrote:  Claims made in the absence of evidence aren't knowledge, they are at best conjectures and at worse falsehoods.

Not buying that excuse.

Quote:Indeed and I don't have BPD.

Never said you did.

Quote:No, there is nothing to "make up". It demonstrates that I choose to behave the way I do.

Then I guess you can't blame anyone but yourself on how this thread turned out... Oh, wait - you did.

Quote:No, there is nothing to "wake-up" to. That you are trying to diagnose someone of a personality disorder via a collection of posts--as well as your valorisation of Fulton's assertions as "knowledge"--suggests that you ideas relating to evidence are misguided.

You are assuming and trying hard to put words in my mouth. Yeah, no - I'm devaluing your input because you seem to think you are the only one entitled to criticizing other people's knowledge as well as criticizing people in general via ad homonym attack - shit like that don't fly so easily around here.

You need to learn that there's nothing wrong with being wrong when it comes to knowledge. Most of what you've spouted on here so far tells me you've never learned that. You react based on what you hold to be knowledge and attack those who aren't out to cause you any foul, thus creating the situation where people retaliate to your arsehole behavior and then you pull the victim card. I'm not surprised you've received the reactions you have.

Come to think of it, it reminds me of the acronym for identifying BPD behavioral traits:

DARVO
Deny
Attack
Reverse
Victim
Offender

This ring a bell to you? It sure has with me.

[Image: 3d366d5c-72a0-4228-b835-f404c2970188_zps...1381867723]
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
02-11-2013, 08:47 PM
RE: [split] Chippy vs the World
(02-11-2013 05:42 PM)lucradis Wrote:  I read through this whole thread. It took me a while because I'm a busy guy.

Very entertaining and informative.

Also I'm really not sure why you guys all seem to have a hate on for chippy. Hilarious. I've quite enjoyed his posts thus far. Granted I've only seen the ones in this thread.

This whole thing is gold.

It's cognitive dissonance. The assumption that is causing them conflict is the naive idea that an educated, well-read and articulate person must be "nice". I know all tihis stuff on a broad range of topics but I am also vitriolic and poisonous. I've blocked the usual responses that would be invoked that relate to ignorance so the plan of attack becomes unclear. You can read the various responses to see how each of them is trying to resolve the dissonance. Here is a synopsis:

(1) I don't actually know anything and I am getting it all from Wikipedia. No one that has invoked this explanation has posted the Wikipedia pages that I am getting my knowledge from.

(2) I do know about all the stuff I post but I have no life and must spend all my time reading. This response is one step removed from resignation.

(3) The nit-picker. The nit-picker looks for things like spelling mistakes and grammatical errors as signs that indicate that somehow indicate that I aren't in reality intelligent or knowledgeable. The substance of my post is ignored and the syntax and grammatical error is used as the absolute measure.

(4) The self-assured ("I know more than you"). This is a strange response in that it commits what is presumed to be undesirable. Look at the "college" issue for a good example of this. I made a reference to determining the gastroentorological professions consensus view on a matter by reading gastroentorological colleges' position statements and other publications. ABeautifulmind asserted boldly that there are no such things as colleges of gastroentorology:

There is no such thing as a gastroenterology college.[1]

Momsurroundedbyboys gave that post a like so she clearly agrees that

There is no such thing as a gastroenterology college.[1]

Clearly there are gastroentorology colleges and colleges for every other specialisation of medicine.

Bear in mind that this plan of attack is predicated on me being ignorant and the interlocutor having superior knowledge. I subsequently posted links to a multitude of professional colleges[2]. Because the premise of the attack was superior knowledge it becomes impossible to concede error (something which I am accused of). See here and here. I am accused of poor word choice in calling a gastroentologists college a gastroentorologists college even though that is the correct name. ABeautifulmind just ignored this issue and the others (s)he was wrong about, see here.

For this response to even look effective the interlocutor must be correct and I wrong. Such was not the case here and ABeautifulmind and Momsurrounded by boys are hoist by their own petard.

(5) The internet forensic psychiatrist. The broad thrust of this approach is to seek to pathologise a behaviour on the basis of signs as revealed in posts. Nosological and psychpathological jargon will be invoked but this is just pseudoscientific decoration, it is really just an attempt at divination. This method of resolving the conflict is strange in that psychopathology is not mutually exclusive of intelligence or knowledge. Even if some psychopathology could be demonstrated it has no bearing on whether someone is correct in what they have posted. So this approach really resolves to that in (2), i.e. he knows stuff but he has no life/he knows stuff but he is mentally ill.
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
02-11-2013, 08:51 PM
RE: [split] Chippy vs the World
Anyone want some random wiki links?

Behold the power of the force!
[Image: fgYtjtY.gif]
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes FSM_scot's post
02-11-2013, 08:53 PM
RE: [split] Chippy vs the World
Name explained...it's an adjective.

chip·py
ˈCHipē/Submit
informal
noun
1.
a promiscuous young woman, esp. a prostitute.
2.
BRIT.
a fish-and-chip shop.
adjective
1.
touchy and irritable.

I'm not anti-social. I'm pro-solitude. Sleepy
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
02-11-2013, 08:55 PM
RE: [split] Chippy vs the World
(02-11-2013 08:53 PM)Anjele Wrote:  Name explained...it's an adjective.

chip·py
ˈCHipē/Submit
informal
noun
1.
a promiscuous young woman, esp. a prostitute.
2.
BRIT.
a fish-and-chip shop.
adjective
1.
touchy and irritable.

And in Australia 'chippy' can be slang for a carpenter Yes
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
02-11-2013, 09:03 PM (This post was last modified: 02-11-2013 09:41 PM by Chippy.)
RE: [split] Chippy vs the World
(02-11-2013 08:22 PM)cheapthrillseaker Wrote:  Not buying that excuse.

You clearly have your own idiosyncratic definition of knowledge. There is no point discusing the matter with me any further. You need to find someone else that shares your private definition and thrash it out with them.

Quote:Then I guess you can't blame anyone but yourself on how this thread turned out... Oh, wait - you did.

No, I didn't "blame" anyone for anything.

Quote:You are assuming and trying hard to put words in my mouth. Yeah, no - I'm devaluing your input because you seem to think you are the only one entitled to criticizing other people's knowledge as well as criticizing people in general via

Devalue all you like.

Quote:ad homonym attack - shit like that don't fly so easily around here.

It is spelled "ad hominem" and it is a contraction of "argumentum ad hominem". Argumentum ad hominem does not mean to insult or verbally abuse someone. Argumentum ad hominem is an a fallacious argument form which I have not committed.

Quote:You need to learn that there's nothing wrong with being wrong when it comes to knowledge.

You need to learn to look things up before believing you have knowledge.

Quote: Most of what you've spouted on here so far tells me you've never learned that.

Most of what you've spouted on here tells me you have no relevant knowledge.

Quote:You react based on what you hold to be knowledge and attack those who aren't out to cause you any foul, thus creating the situation where people retaliate to your arsehole behavior and then you pull the victim card. I'm not surprised you've received the reactions you have.

Show me where I have "pull[ed] the victim card"?

Quote:Come to think of it, it reminds me of the acronym for identifying BPD behavioral traits:

DARVO
Deny
Attack
Reverse
Victim
Offender

This ring a bell to you? It sure has with me.

So what exactly would be the significance of me having BPD if I did have it? Would it mean that lactose is in fact a monosaccharide, that there is no such thing as the American College of Gastroentorology, that all eco-systems require regular mass death, that "ad hominem" is Latin for "insult"? It bears on nothing. You haven't really thought this through. You can and will believe whatever you want about me. You can invent whatever fictional biography you want if it will make you feel better. I'll make it easy for you, I have every condition that is described in DSM-IV-TR? What then?
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply
Forum Jump: