[split] Gun Control (Orlando Mass Shooting)
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
27-06-2016, 11:12 AM
RE: [split] Gun Control (Orlando Mass Shooting)
(27-06-2016 11:07 AM)Chas Wrote:  
(27-06-2016 11:04 AM)Gawdzilla Wrote:  Still doesn't make any sense.

What doesn't make any sense?
You keep repeating "particular individual" but not explaining what YOU mean by that.
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
27-06-2016, 02:08 PM
RE: [split] Gun Control (Orlando Mass Shooting)
(27-06-2016 11:12 AM)Gawdzilla Wrote:  
(27-06-2016 11:07 AM)Chas Wrote:  What doesn't make any sense?
You keep repeating "particular individual" but not explaining what YOU mean by that.

I thought the language quite clear. "...or real danger of public injury from individuals."
It means each individual is judged to be a danger or not. It is not the situation (e.g. carrying a concealed weapon on a bus) but whether a given person is prevented from doing so.

Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
[Image: flagstiny%206.gif]
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
27-06-2016, 02:25 PM
RE: [split] Gun Control (Orlando Mass Shooting)
(27-06-2016 02:08 PM)Chas Wrote:  
(27-06-2016 11:12 AM)Gawdzilla Wrote:  You keep repeating "particular individual" but not explaining what YOU mean by that.

I thought the language quite clear. "...or real danger of public injury from individuals."
It means each individual is judged to be a danger or not. It is not the situation (e.g. carrying a concealed weapon on a bus) but whether a given person is prevented from doing so.
I read that the individuals where the danger.
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
27-06-2016, 05:12 PM
RE: [split] Gun Control (Orlando Mass Shooting)
(27-06-2016 02:25 PM)Gawdzilla Wrote:  
(27-06-2016 02:08 PM)Chas Wrote:  I thought the language quite clear. "...or real danger of public injury from individuals."
It means each individual is judged to be a danger or not. It is not the situation (e.g. carrying a concealed weapon on a bus) but whether a given person is prevented from doing so.
I read that the individuals where the danger.

Yes, but only some individuals.

Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
[Image: flagstiny%206.gif]
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply
Forum Jump: