[split] Resurrection of Jesus - Argument with Ralph Ellis
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
11-07-2013, 04:40 AM
RE: [split] Resurrection of Jesus - Argument with Ralph Ellis
(05-07-2013 05:15 PM)morondog Wrote:  My GOD whatever shall we do ? I know, I'll just go prove it by convincing non-experts on internet forums... that'll show all those bastards who rejected my stuff on peer-review...

Err, I don't think you understand. The forum here is largely irrelevant, but attracting informed detractors like Maklelan is useful (as has happened previously).

Maklelan could have blown me out of the water by providing cast-iron proof that Adiabene is indeed a reference to Abella. But he didn't, because he couldn't, for there is no such evidence. And that is indeed useful information.

As I said, the seed has been sown....


.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
04-02-2014, 01:02 PM
RE: [split] Resurrection of Jesus - Argument with Ralph Ellis
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
04-02-2014, 01:03 PM
RE: [split] Resurrection of Jesus - Argument with Ralph Ellis
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
04-02-2014, 01:31 PM
RE: [split] Resurrection of Jesus - Argument with Ralph Ellis
Delta bravo try posting without quotes. This thread seems tainted somehow.


God is a concept by which we measure our pain -- John Lennon

Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
04-02-2014, 01:45 PM
RE: [split] Resurrection of Jesus - Argument with Ralph Ellis
(04-02-2014 01:02 PM)Deltabravo Wrote:  I did what y'all suggested and read through the posts on this thread. This is the most puzzling one. It seems to say "I have difficulty with new ideas just like everyone else and since I like to be liked I just try to be nice"

Followed by the comment, which I find incomprehensible that "The old stories about Jesus, Saul, and the like make sense as well".

Which old stories? That Jesus was resurrected, was born of a virgin, son of God? they make sense?

Or that it is all an first century Harry Potter story with no basis in a single historical fact about real, unmagical, non-divine person who had the same name and survived a crucifixion.

This is what he posted. He had too many start-quote tags.

It's Special Pleadings all the way down!


Magic Talking Snakes STFU -- revenantx77


You can't have your special pleading and eat it too. -- WillHop
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply
Forum Jump: