[split] W00t
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
09-10-2014, 01:50 PM
RE: [split] W00t
(09-10-2014 01:47 PM)Dom Wrote:  Ok,
I don't want crap talk in the intro section either. It has it's own rules. That's all there is to it.

The lack of intelligent communications with theists is a whole other subject. I wish that was possible too, and I long stopped taking part in any dialog with theists because it's impossible to do so. At the blink of an eye there are a zillion aggressive posts and the theist can't think straight anymore (whether they could do that in the first place is another story, one that will never be found out at this rate).

But this has nothing to do with talking crap in the intro section. It's not allowed, so cut it out. Dodgy

I disputed that the OP even belonged in the Intro thread. It was 80% passive-aggressive editorial.

Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
[Image: flagstiny%206.gif]
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
09-10-2014, 01:59 PM
RE: [split] W00t
Was it his first post? Then it belongs there. He gets to show y'all what he is like there, without being clobbered. That happens after he comes outta there.

[Image: dobie.png]Science is the process we've designed to be responsible for generating our best guess as to what the fuck is going on. Girly Man
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
09-10-2014, 02:07 PM
RE: [split] W00t
Dom, he's an old member who joined in 2010 and returned.

Having said that, returning members can post intro threads also.

Which is why ultimately this thread was split.


But as if to knock me down, reality came around
And without so much as a mere touch, cut me into little pieces

Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
09-10-2014, 02:31 PM
RE: [split] W00t
I actually see this place as where its what they SAY gets scrunity ... Not them personally. To me it falls under the heading of
"If you cant take the heat stay out of the kichen" type domain here.
It doesnt say multidenominational on the door....right?

And im all for legitimate healthy exchange....but its so very rare when a theist comes here with clear honest agenda.
And when you question their verbiage they get butthurt immediately and cry foul.
Well.... What site did youcome to??

WTAF?
PCism can break a place just like rabid posters can.

Somewhere healthy in the middle is my vote.

When I want your opinion I'll read your entrails.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes WitchSabrina's post
09-10-2014, 02:43 PM
RE: [split] W00t
(09-10-2014 11:38 AM)Hughsie Wrote:  
(09-10-2014 11:18 AM)Revenant77x Wrote:  You know those people in that thread Hughsie didn't bother reading but heard about.

Go fuck yourself Rev. If you have no idea what people are talking about then take the time to find out before making your bitchy little comments and making yourself sound like a 14 year old girl.

Quoted for irony.

We'll love you just the way you are
If you're perfect -- Alanis Morissette
(06-02-2014 03:47 PM)Momsurroundedbyboys Wrote:  And I'm giving myself a conclusion again from all the facepalming.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 4 users Like morondog's post
09-10-2014, 03:01 PM
RE: [split] W00t
(09-10-2014 01:59 PM)Dom Wrote:  Was it his first post? Then it belongs there. He gets to show y'all what he is like there, without being clobbered. That happens after he comes outta there.

No, the twenty-first. Sorry, it was not an intro post.

Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
[Image: flagstiny%206.gif]
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
09-10-2014, 03:01 PM
RE: [split] W00t
(09-10-2014 02:07 PM)Momsurroundedbyboys Wrote:  Dom, he's an old member who joined in 2010 and returned.

Having said that, returning members can post intro threads also.

Which is why ultimately this thread was split.

Wrongly. It should have been moved.

Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
[Image: flagstiny%206.gif]
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
09-10-2014, 03:03 PM
RE: [split] W00t
(09-10-2014 02:31 PM)WitchSabrina Wrote:  I actually see this place as where its what they SAY gets scrunity ... Not them personally. To me it falls under the heading of
"If you cant take the heat stay out of the kichen" type domain here.
It doesnt say multidenominational on the door....right?

And im all for legitimate healthy exchange....but its so very rare when a theist comes here with clear honest agenda.
And when you question their verbiage they get butthurt immediately and cry foul.
Well.... What site did youcome to??

WTAF?
PCism can break a place just like rabid posters can.

Somewhere healthy in the middle is my vote.

Well, it does say the site is not just for atheists. Drinking Beverage

Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
[Image: flagstiny%206.gif]
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
09-10-2014, 03:06 PM
RE: [split] W00t
(09-10-2014 03:01 PM)Chas Wrote:  
(09-10-2014 02:07 PM)Momsurroundedbyboys Wrote:  Dom, he's an old member who joined in 2010 and returned.

Having said that, returning members can post intro threads also.

Which is why ultimately this thread was split.

Wrongly. It should have been moved.

I'm sorry you disagree.


But as if to knock me down, reality came around
And without so much as a mere touch, cut me into little pieces

Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes Momsurroundedbyboys's post
09-10-2014, 04:09 PM
RE: [split] W00t
(09-10-2014 01:45 PM)Chas Wrote:  
(09-10-2014 01:42 PM)Deidre32 Wrote:  Not sure if you guys know fr0d0 or Mystic Knight from AF, but they're both theists and very down to earth and easy to have a productive dialogue with, even if they don't agree with atheists. I've never seen arrogance or disparaging remarks by them and most treat them with respect. I was once a theist, so I try to be open to what is being offered. But if the poster is uppity or preachy, I just tune out.

But I don't feel the need to rail back. I remember what it was like to be overwhelmed by theism. Theists feel in large part that it is a "higher calling" that leads them to witness. That may be mainly a Christian thing.

Those two get their asses handed to them regularly. And Fr0d0 is not always polite.

sometimes, we can be that way, too. Blush

That said, I haven't seen enough banter between fr0d0 and Mystic Knight to have seen any negative effects. I'd say MK handles most exchanges with grace. I think so, anyway.

It's funny, but the sad truth is if none of us shared our religious 'statuses' with anyone on these forums...no one would be the wiser. Once the labels come out, so do the fangs, from either side at times. lol

Be true to yourself. Heart
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply
Forum Jump: