srdanova math



14012012, 07:54 AM




srdanova math
SRDANOVA MATHEMATICS
Revision of the current mathematics Marjanovic Srdan M.Biljanica 16201 Manojlovce Serbia ms.biljanica@gmail.com Introduction: I think that the current limited maths and sinful and should be reviewed with all new things that I discovered. I will explain the mathematical space with two starting points ( along the natural and real ). Natural Base: Natural along is what you see along the fig,1.Natural along has its beginning and its end , this property natural long we will contact points ( fig.2).Natural length along the ground ( natural meaning).Two more natural and longer merge points [S1]along nature (fig. 1a), [Sn]mathematical facts [S2]point ( natural meaning , Fig.2 A(B)) The points will mark capital letters along the (length) small letters Definition of  teo points A,B , the length between points AB CM (current mathematics)  does not recognize the concept of nature along , the point is not defined so that all l everything __________________________________________________ ___________ PresuppositionNatural long  merge points in the direction AB Process: P1AB..CD..ABC(AC) to read: natural along AB to point B, is connected to the natural long CD to point C, shall be renaming of points, we get along ABC (AC) P2ABC (AC) .. DE ..ABCD (AD) read it: along the ABC (AC) to point C, connecting with the natural longDE to point D is done renaming of points, we get along ABCD(AD) P3ABCD (AD) ..EF .. ABCDE(AE) ... [S3]along (from natural long, two or more) Definition of the initialand the last point, the length between the initial and final points. CMI do not know the connection of natural longer, not along the natural base, but the real (the line , proof) __________________________________________________ ______________ Presupposition  All points of a longer (the infinite form) can be replaced with labels: (0), (0.1), ...,( 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 ),... The process: P1N(0)= {0,00,000,0000,...} P2N(0,1)= {0,1,10,11,100,...} ... P10N (0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) = {0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11, ...} ... [S4]numeric along [S5]set of natural numbers N We will use N (0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) = {0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12 ,...} Definition ofnumeric along a starting point, the last point at infinity The number 0 is the point 0 Other numbers are longer, the first item is 0, the last point is the point of the name (number) CMI know the term but long term numeric numeric rays (line) Natural numbers and zeros are given axiom 

14012012, 12:49 PM




RE: srdanova math
(14012012 07:54 AM)msbiljanica Wrote: SRDANOVA MATHEMATICS What does this mean? Quote:CM (current mathematics)  does not recognize the concept of nature along , the point is not defined so that all l everything Quote:CMI do not know the connection of natural longer, not along the natural base, but the real (the line , proof) What is not defined in current mathematics? Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims. Science is not a subject, but a method. 

14012012, 03:14 PM




RE: srdanova math
This guy's a spammer. A quick Google search shows he makes the exact same posts in tons of freethinking forums.


1 user Likes Ben's post 
14012012, 03:32 PM




RE: srdanova math
(14012012 03:14 PM)Ben Wrote: This guy's a spammer. A quick Google search shows he makes the exact same posts in tons of freethinking forums. I'm such a sucker for this kind of post. Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims. Science is not a subject, but a method. 

1 user Likes Chas's post 
14012012, 03:50 PM




RE: srdanova math
(14012012 03:14 PM)Ben Wrote: This guy's a spammer. A quick Google search shows he makes the exact same posts in tons of freethinking forums. It's really weird for spam, is he trying to sell his idea that maths is wrong? If so he would be better trying that some way other than posting it on atheist forums. Most of us aren't mathematicians, it seems kind of pointless. Behold the power of the force! 

14012012, 03:58 PM




RE: srdanova math
(14012012 03:50 PM)FSM_scot Wrote:(14012012 03:14 PM)Ben Wrote: This guy's a spammer. A quick Google search shows he makes the exact same posts in tons of freethinking forums. I dunno, but on many other forums he has fewer than 5 posts and has made this exact post in all of them. 

14012012, 04:17 PM




RE: srdanova math
(14012012 03:58 PM)Ben Wrote: I dunno, but on many other forums he has fewer than 5 posts and has made this exact post in all of them. strange. Behold the power of the force! 

14012012, 08:47 PM




RE: srdanova math
(14012012 03:50 PM)FSM_scot Wrote: It's really weird for spam, is he trying to sell his idea that maths is wrong? If so he would be better trying that some way other than posting it on atheist forums. Most of us aren't mathematicians, it seems kind of pointless. When a single person thinks he knows better than a thousand brilliant minds that have preceded him, I suspect an extremely inflated ego, a dillusional person and or a megalomaniac. If he turns out to be a genius that profoundly moves math forward, he will become a household name an a decade or two. But I suspect that the mathmaticians in this world that have heard of this guy have already wrtten him off as a lost cause. When I find myself in times of trouble, Richard Dawkins comes to me, speaking words of reason, now I see, now I see. 

2 users Like No J.'s post 
15012012, 09:54 AM




RE: srdanova math
chas
What does this mean? Quote:CM (current mathematics)  does not recognize the concept of nature along , the point is not defined so that all l everythingwhat is the point to you, the value of the item, can something that has value can be made up of nothing (along made up of points) Quote:CMI do not know the connection of natural longer, not along the natural base, but the real (the line , proof)What is not defined in current mathematics? never gets along natural FSM_scot Quote:It's really weird for spam, is he trying to sell his idea that maths is wrong? If so he would be better trying that some way other than posting it on atheist forums. Most of us aren't mathematicians, it seems kind of pointless.mathematicians trained to act like believers (what is written in the holy book is the mathematical constant, any other conception of mathematics is a heresy). No J. Quote:When a single person thinks he knows better than a thousand brilliant minds that have preceded him, I suspect an extremely inflated ego, a dillusional person and or a megalomaniac.if you look at the history of science are all great geniuses were initially regarded as fools and crazy ... ___________________________________________________________ Presuppositionpoint numbers have their The process: P10 = (.0) P21 = (.0,1) P32 = (.0,1,2) P43 = (.0,1,2,3) P54 = (.0,1,2,3,4) ... [S6]point number CMI do not know the item number ________________________________________________________________ Presuppositionpoint numbers have opposite The process: P10 = (s.0) P21 = (s.0, 1) P32 = (s.0, 1.2) P43 = (s.0, 1,2,3) P54 = (s.0, 1,2,3,4) ... [S7]opposite point of SMI do not know the opposite point of _______________________________________________ Presuppositionnumbers are comparable with each other The process: P1two numbers (a, b) are comparable with each other  a> b, a = b, a <b, ).(=(>,=,<) P2three numbers (a, b, c) are comparable with each other P3four numbers (a, b, c, d) are comparable with each other ... [S8]comparability issues CMknown two of comparability, comparability of three numbers (a number comparable with the number of the PC),comparability of the other knows. 

15012012, 11:44 AM




RE: srdanova math
(15012012 09:54 AM)msbiljanica Wrote: chas You are not explaining this in an intelligible manner. Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims. Science is not a subject, but a method. 

2 users Like Chas's post 
« Next Oldest  Next Newest »

User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)