srdanova math



15022012, 09:05 AM




RE: srdanova math
(14022012 09:57 PM)lucradis Wrote: Nah what they were talking about way bak then was the invention of the abbaccus. Oh...yeah, that was the name. It's been so long I forgot! It was just a fucking apple man, we're sorry okay? Please stop the madness ~Izel 

1 user Likes Erxomai's post 
15022012, 02:59 PM




RE: srdanova math
(15022012 08:42 AM)robotworld Wrote: Did I just write all this? Yes, for I'm really curious in what you are trying to say.He's probably going to say PresuppositionTwo ( more) multiplying the same numbers can be for short write Process: P1 a×(s.c)a=a^(s.c)2, a^(s.a)b P2 a×(s.c)a×(s.c)a=a^(s.a)3 , a^(s.a)b P3 a×(s.c)a×(s.c)a×(s.c)a=a^(s.a)4 ,a^(s.a)b ... General form a^(s.a)b [S37]graduation CM[S37]know,axiom __________________________________ PresuppositionIn terms a^(s.a)b , b can be number 0 (1) Process: P1 a^(s.a)0 P2 a^(s.a)1 [S37a]graduation amendment Observer Agnostic atheist Secular humanist Emotional rationalist Disclaimer: Don’t mix the personal opinion above with the absolute and objective truth. Remember to think for yourself. Thank you. 

2 users Like Observer's post 
15022012, 04:05 PM




RE: srdanova math
(15022012 08:42 AM)robotworld Wrote: msbiljanica, I applaud your mad persistence. Not only did you tirelessly post your theorems here, but you did the exact same thing, with identical posts, to OH YOU MUST BE KIDDING ME, MORE THAN A HUNDRED FREAKING FORUMS related to science. And from your ability to reply to our posts, you must be human. I have asked him to give a summary in English  he responded by asking me if understood or was educated in maths. I told him to go piss up a rope. He can't seem to find a speaker of English. Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims. Science is not a subject, but a method. 

15022012, 04:57 PM
(This post was last modified: 15022012 05:15 PM by GirlyMan.)




RE: srdanova math
(03022012 06:14 PM)GirlyMan Wrote:(03022012 06:22 AM)Chas Wrote: Please get a competent translator to present an overview of your idea. (15022012 04:05 PM)Chas Wrote: He can't seem to find a speaker of English. bump for Filox. (14022012 09:09 PM)Erxomai Wrote: This must be the new math I've been hearing about ever since Kindergarten. (14022012 09:57 PM)lucradis Wrote: Nah what they were talking about way bak then was the invention of the abbaccus. (15022012 09:05 AM)Erxomai Wrote: Oh...yeah, that was the name. It's been so long I forgot! There's a reason you're not allowed use of the more dangerous tools until you've demonstrated a competency on the simpler ones. ... I mean it could get dangerous quickly. P.S. Don't get me wrong, the OP is HoC insane. But unlike HoC, I find him much harder to interpret. He needs to use CM to introduce his new notation or it's just gonna be a bridge too far. Any promise of a postmortem preservation of personal identity is preposterous. (read in Daffy Duck voice) 

1 user Likes GirlyMan's post 
15022012, 05:57 PM




RE: srdanova math
Haha.... very fucking funny (the whole thread)
Humankind (a total misnomer) 

1 user Likes aurora's post 
15022012, 06:12 PM




RE: srdanova math
(15022012 05:57 PM)aurora2020 Wrote: Haha.... very fucking funny (the whole thread) ain't that why we're here ... Any promise of a postmortem preservation of personal identity is preposterous. (read in Daffy Duck voice) 

15022012, 06:19 PM




RE: srdanova math
(15022012 06:12 PM)GirlyMan Wrote:(15022012 05:57 PM)aurora2020 Wrote: Haha.... very fucking funny (the whole thread) Where's the question mark, Girly? Either you're being rhetorical or you've caught the posters disease! Humankind (a total misnomer) 

2 users Like aurora's post 
15022012, 07:07 PM




RE: srdanova math
(15022012 06:19 PM)aurora2020 Wrote: Where's the question mark, Girly? Math and logic can't fool Girly, ... math and logic's already told me as much. ... Any promise of a postmortem preservation of personal identity is preposterous. (read in Daffy Duck voice) 

1 user Likes GirlyMan's post 
16022012, 06:08 AM




RE: srdanova math
(15022012 08:42 AM)robotworld Wrote: It takes time to explain. We will be very interested in what you say, provided that you can put it in terms a layman from the year 2012 can understand.Let's suppose that you have 7 years of age, have more natural along (sm) and Basic rule(sm) and the concept of point (sm), I am learning and my math. [S3]you only have (sm) as you do not you know when building a meaningful angle, when you have no defined space, when you do not have defined plane, when you have no defined line ?to resolve to make a semiline along the natural, the rule is given [S3] that it does not repeat [S4],[S5]Now you have a task to edit your semiline to the point that you call from a different characters (0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) circular and positionally, thus getting a new term (number along or number semiline)observe the relationship in number along (number semiline) so that is your point (0) to point (0) or with other points (1,2,3,4, ...), this ratio will be called the natural numbers N take a number (along) the number along, and read the number of points (along) this is the point Nuber [S6], then take two of the same number (along) and you place them opposite each other along and read the opposite, what did you do it number opposite number [S7] here's a new game for you, take two (more) numbers along the number and erect them, one is bigger than the other, the other is less than the third, third and fourth are equal, this is the comparability of [S8] have two number along, you take the numbers from one (along) and ride around the first number of points along 0, and furthermore, the mobility of your games were a number of [s9] take a pencil and you make yourself, along the natural (mark the end of), take the second number (along), became one next to each other to just touch and now another push from the first along the natural, this is your game number gap (gap along) [S10] If you like to teach you I will continue 

16022012, 10:12 AM




RE: srdanova math
(16022012 06:08 AM)msbiljanica Wrote:(15022012 08:42 AM)robotworld Wrote: It takes time to explain. We will be very interested in what you say, provided that you can put it in terms a layman from the year 2012 can understand.Let's suppose that you have 7 years of age, have more natural along (sm) and Basic rule(sm) and the concept of point (sm), I am learning and my math. That's better But can you define some terms, in layman term's please What do you mean by your [s3], [s4], [s5], [s6], [s7], [s8], [s9].... ? Also, what is the "Basic Rule" and "concept of point"? Do you by chance mean the fixed point index? With regards to your game, if I interpret correctly, I have a number line, let's say 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 and I arrange in a circle. From one point, let's say 8, if I draw a line to another number, let's say 2, I somehow get a ratio (Here I do not understand, do you mean the ratio of the two sectors of the circle?). Also, before we continue, may I know which field of mathematics is your theory based in? Yes, as the others said, you should find a friend who is very competent in English. If you work in a university, the linguistics department should be a great help in conveying your message. Thank you, I appreciate your effort. Welcome to science. You're gonna like it here  Phil Plait Have you ever tried taking a comfort blanket away from a small child?  DLJ 

« Next Oldest  Next Newest »

User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)