srdanova math
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
24-02-2012, 11:18 AM
RE: srdanova math
Ok, I think I have a least a few words... I think that "natural long" might be "natural line" or "natural number line" and "number along" might be "number line". I don't think he realizes how much the translation doesn't sound like anything normal.

If you are reading this, msbiljanica, if I started a preposition with "first take the normal insole and with the dogs behind lift up the tree crack and rub them both together" and then tell you that's math, you'd look at me like I was nuts. Not saying that's what you are saying, but just trying to show that the words aren't making a lot of sense and we have to try and decipher them, but not because you are being profound. Take your translation and run it through google to English and back to your language and see if you understand it... Then make sure every word was translated back with what you thought.

Ok, beyond that... are you talking about a number line and natural numbers?

Defy gravity... stand up. Drinking Beverage
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
24-02-2012, 01:38 PM
RE: srdanova math
(24-02-2012 08:54 AM)msbiljanica Wrote:  
(23-02-2012 02:36 PM)nach_in Wrote:  relation between this numbers for instance 4-2=2 is the same as ☼1(2)1☼
longer than (number 4) subtract along the (number 2) you will get along (the number 2)
two longer lengths ( two numbers ) ¤1( )1¤ are separated by a gap (2)
here is one who has the intelligence to understand my math part


(23-02-2012 02:48 PM)lucradis Wrote:  I personally think he's just insane. But I'll bet people thought that about Einstein too, what with his crazy hair and magic numbers...
He looks like a nutter.
easiest to play other people's knowledge, create new knowledge to belong only to individuals

YAY!! I feel smart XD BOW TO ME MORTALS!!!

[Image: sigvacachica.png]
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
25-02-2012, 05:19 AM
RE: srdanova math
Presupposition-Term written in abbreviated form
a: (..0)b=a
a: (..1)b=c
...
a: (..g)b=1
Process:
625: (..0)5=625 (..d) - counter divisions
625: (..1)5=125
625: (..2)5=25
626: (..3)5=5
625: (..4)5=1
   
[S42]-root
[S43]-counter divide
CM-[42] - know [43]-dot no know
_____________________
PDF [S43] - http://www.mediafire.com/?435vx8lu7111n5f
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
25-02-2012, 05:55 AM (This post was last modified: 25-02-2012 06:19 AM by craniumonempty.)
RE: srdanova math
OTHER FORUMS:
http://forum.allaboutcircuits.com/showth...hp?t=66132 which you said in one:
Quote:Thank you for the welcome, this is like a like Euclid's Elements, in the simplest form, as geometric objects (the first natural geometrical object along the notion of point, the basic rule), all other evidence (slightly different than the current mathematics), which arise as a ratio of two (more) geometrical object formed from natural or along previous geometrical object. the point is that I think all of their math geometry, and that the numbers are a calculation function is actually another name for the related geometrical object
.. that forum studiot was really trying to help, but you kept plowing on.
http://www.thescienceforum.com/new-hypot...atics.html
http://forum-3.com/math-forum/topic123900.html
http://scienceforums.com/topic/24467-srdanova-math/
http://2012forum.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=59&t=26968
http://talkrational.org/showthread.php?t=46384
http://www.usmessageboard.com/science-an...-math.html
http://www.mathisfunforum.com/viewtopic.php?pid=201512
... and many, many others

Do you really understand what we are asking you or is google translate bad in both directions (probably)? I want to ask questions all the way up to where you are now, but you keep moving forward and want people just to pick it up.. maybe even rewrite it for you. I'm not sure.

Ok, I'm going to ask you this until you answer the questions (or at least I'll try):

Quote: Natural Base:
Natural along is what you see along the fig,1.Natural along has its beginning and its end , this
property natural long we will contact points ( fig.2).Natural length along the ground ( natural
meaning).Two more natural and longer merge points

What is a "natural along" a "number line of natural numbers"? Simply a line? Longitude? movement? field? a type of space? Are you trying to explain what it is in this paper? Should we already know what it is?

Defy gravity... stand up. Drinking Beverage
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
25-02-2012, 09:28 AM
RE: srdanova math
(25-02-2012 05:55 AM)craniumonempty Wrote:  OTHER FORUMS:
http://forum.allaboutcircuits.com/showth...hp?t=66132 which you said in one:
Quote:Thank you for the welcome, this is like a like Euclid's Elements, in the simplest form, as geometric objects (the first natural geometrical object along the notion of point, the basic rule), all other evidence (slightly different than the current mathematics), which arise as a ratio of two (more) geometrical object formed from natural or along previous geometrical object. the point is that I think all of their math geometry, and that the numbers are a calculation function is actually another name for the related geometrical object
.. that forum studiot was really trying to help, but you kept plowing on.
http://www.thescienceforum.com/new-hypot...atics.html
http://forum-3.com/math-forum/topic123900.html
http://scienceforums.com/topic/24467-srdanova-math/
http://2012forum.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=59&t=26968
http://talkrational.org/showthread.php?t=46384
http://www.usmessageboard.com/science-an...-math.html
http://www.mathisfunforum.com/viewtopic.php?pid=201512
... and many, many others

Do you really understand what we are asking you or is google translate bad in both directions (probably)? I want to ask questions all the way up to where you are now, but you keep moving forward and want people just to pick it up.. maybe even rewrite it for you. I'm not sure.

Ok, I'm going to ask you this until you answer the questions (or at least I'll try):

Quote: Natural Base:
Natural along is what you see along the fig,1.Natural along has its beginning and its end , this
property natural long we will contact points ( fig.2).Natural length along the ground ( natural
meaning).Two more natural and longer merge points

What is a "natural along" a "number line of natural numbers"? Simply a line? Longitude? movement? field? a type of space? Are you trying to explain what it is in this paper? Should we already know what it is?
many people need to see my work, and who understands there's something in my head, read the history of mathematics, and you will see for each new thing in mathematics is in the beginning of contention and laughing (until many years pass), if you can not logically connect to things you never you will not learn my math, math is not that song is learned by heart, but translating the abstract into the real life (which is an operation or procedure should be applied to solve the problem)
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
25-02-2012, 09:44 AM
RE: srdanova math
OK. See the problem isn't that nobody understands your math.

The problem is you haven't explained it. People can't look at an entire book written in another language and figure out what all the words are without some help.

It would just look like this: akjshf kjasfe jkk rj ikejr lkejr mkdfmlsd kjlj er jjijfm lkaf ;kj

Can you tell me what that means?

I suck at math, but there are a few people here who actually excel at it. You are not giving them a chance to learn it. You just keep typing characters on the scrren without explaining what they mean.

We aren't from where you are I would guess. Some of the symbols may not be used in the same way, so this is where it becomes important to explain everything in detail, or just stop typing.

Writing gibberish is pointless.

"I think of myself as an intelligent, sensitive human being with the soul of a clown which always forces me to blow it at the most important moments." -Jim Morrison
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes lucradis's post
25-02-2012, 09:50 AM (This post was last modified: 25-02-2012 09:58 AM by craniumonempty.)
RE: srdanova math
(25-02-2012 09:28 AM)msbiljanica Wrote:  many people need to see my work, and who understands there's something in my head, read the history of mathematics, and you will see for each new thing in mathematics is in the beginning of contention and laughing (until many years pass), if you can not logically connect to things you never you will not learn my math, math is not that song is learned by heart, but translating the abstract into the real life (which is an operation or procedure should be applied to solve the problem)

I'm not laughing, and I don't sing (well, I shouldn't sing). I'm asking for an explanation not a poem. What is an "along" and what do you mean by this? Answer that and we'll take the next step. This is a language issue, I think, but it's hard to say if you don't explain it without breaking into copy/paste mode.

Quote: Natural Base:
Natural along is what you see along the fig,1.Natural along has its beginning and its end , this
property natural long we will contact points ( fig.2).Natural length along the ground ( natural
meaning).Two more natural and longer merge points

What is "natural along"?

Defy gravity... stand up. Drinking Beverage
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes craniumonempty's post
27-02-2012, 10:26 AM
RE: srdanova math
Presupposition-Term written in abbreviated form , number b is replaced with other numbers
,alternating
a: (..0)b=a
a: (..1)b=c
...
a: (..g)b=1
Process:
400: (..1)4=100
400: (..2)5=20
400: (..3)4=5
400: (..4)5=1
   
[S44]-inequality root
CM-[S44] -dot no know
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
28-02-2012, 09:31 AM
RE: srdanova math
Presupposition-Part number (the number of gaps) negates the second number(gap number)
-one of then must be gaps numbers
Process:
   
P1- 0=¤3(1)2(1)2¤n(.0)¤2(2)2¤=1
P2- 1=¤3(1)2(1)2¤n(.1)¤2(2)2¤=1
P3- ¤1(2)1¤=¤3(1)2(1)2¤n(.2)¤2(2)2¤=2-image
P4- 1=¤3(1)2(1)2¤n(.3)¤2(2)2¤=1
P5- 0=¤3(1)2(1)2¤n(.4)¤2(2)2¤=1
P6- 1=¤3(1)2(1)2¤n(.5)¤2(2)2¤=2
P7- 0=¤3(1)2(1)2¤n(.6)¤2(2)2¤=1
P8- 0=¤3(1)2(1)2¤n(.7)¤2(2)2¤=0
P9- 0=¤3(1)2(1)2¤n(.8)¤2(2)2¤=0
P10- 0=¤3(1)2(1)2¤n(.9)¤2(2)2¤=0
General form
negates 1=a n (.c)b=negates 2
or
negates 1 =a n (.c)b
negates 2
[S45]-negates
CM-[S45] -dot no know
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
28-02-2012, 10:16 AM
RE: srdanova math
[Image: EYO9e.gif]
[Image: kOS9L.gif]

"I think of myself as an intelligent, sensitive human being with the soul of a clown which always forces me to blow it at the most important moments." -Jim Morrison
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 2 users Like lucradis's post
Post Reply
Forum Jump: