srdanova math



26012012, 11:15 PM
(This post was last modified: 26012012 11:27 PM by GirlyMan.)




RE: srdanova math
(26012012 03:23 AM)msbiljanica Wrote: PDF http://www.mediafire.com/file/2c7vvarvvqaqp63/srdanova math.pdf Dude, you're batshit insane. Calculus covers all of your concerns. Fortunately, we got a history of accommodating your ilk here. #sigh 

3 users Like GirlyMan's post 
27012012, 08:33 AM




RE: srdanova math
PresuppositionSrcko can join a number not that can not be in the structure srcko
Process: P1 101070 and 5 , 5_101070 P2 5520 and 22 ,5520_22 P3 75 and 25 , 75_25 P4 68 and 2 ,2_68 ... General form abc_d , d_abc , ab_d ,d_ab... [S15]pendant srcko CM[S15]does no know Noteonly one number can be pendand , number two goes into a complex srcko __________________________________________________________ PresuppositionTwo ( more ) srcko (pendand srcko) are combined into one unit Process: P1 106 and 118 , 106118 P2 10565 and 703 ,10565_703 P3 30360 and 45277_78 ,30360_45277_78 ... General form abcd , abc_de ,abc_def_g ,... [S16]two ( more) srcko CM[S16]does no know 

27012012, 08:59 AM




RE: srdanova math
(27012012 08:33 AM)msbiljanica Wrote: PresuppositionSrcko can join a number not that can not be in the structure srcko You seem persistent. Maybe you are trying to tell us an important message that will affect the entirety of civilisation through numbers? You need to explain in simpler terms, it's for the good of all of us. Who knows, your sequences may be the very key to stop an impending nuclear war, or the solution to a complex alien mathematical question. Are you in danger, or are you from the future, warning us about the policies governments are implementing? You need to speak, we can help You seem to be seeking help in a variety of forums, all who label you as a spammer. You should properly introduce yourself if you haven't. Welcome to science. You're gonna like it here  Phil Plait Have you ever tried taking a comfort blanket away from a small child?  DLJ 

2 users Like robotworld's post 
27012012, 04:41 PM




RE: srdanova math
(26012012 11:15 PM)GirlyMan Wrote:(26012012 03:23 AM)msbiljanica Wrote: PDF http://www.mediafire.com/file/2c7vvarvvqaqp63/srdanova math.pdf Correct me if I'm completely wrong here, cause I really don't understand what he's saying well, but I thought his point was not that current math can't cover these matters, it's that he's found a way to cover it with fewer axioms. 

27012012, 05:56 PM




Please find a competent translator
Please find a competent translator or STOP POSTING!
Your posts are completely unintelligible, and I have a degree in mathematics. Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims. Science is not a subject, but a method. 

2 users Like Chas's post 
27012012, 06:11 PM
(This post was last modified: 27012012 06:14 PM by GirlyMan.)




RE: Please find a competent translator
(27012012 05:56 PM)Chas Wrote: Please find a competent translator or STOP POSTING!bump. #sigh 

28012012, 02:00 AM
(This post was last modified: 28012012 02:05 AM by msbiljanica.)




RE: Please find a competent translator
(27012012 05:56 PM)Chas Wrote: Please find a competent translator or STOP POSTING!original serbian prvo moraš da se oslobodiš da gledaš stvari kao sadašnja matematika , drugo počni kao da od početka učiš matematiku , treće celokupna matematika je u stvari geometrija ( pa na brojeve , tačke , računske operacije gledaj kao odnose geometrijskih tela ( u ovom slučaju na number along )) , četvrto svaki novi pojam potiče iz predhodnog ( ili prvog aksioma ) što znači ako ne znaš predhodne pojmove nove ne možeš da shvatiš google translator first you have to let go of things to watch as the present mathematics as a second start from the beginning to teach math, the third all the math is really the geometry (and the numbers, points, calculation of geometric relationships look like the body (in this case the number along) ), every fourth new term comes from the previous (or first axioms) which means if you do not know the previous terms of the new you can not understand Quote:benCorrect me if I'm completely wrong here, cause I really don't understand what he's saying well, but I thought his point was not that current math can't cover these matters, it's that he's found a way to cover it with fewer axioms.praise you that you understood the essence of 

28012012, 03:47 AM




RE: srdanova math
PresuppositionTwo ( more ) srcko have the first ( last) common number
Process: P1 10530 and 3330 , 10533(_30) P2 4444 and 441094 and 44256 , 44(_44_)1094256 ... General form abcd(_e) , ab(_c_)defg , ... [S17]two ( more) firstlast srcko CM[S17]does no know ______________________________________________________ PresuppositionIn the expression a+(.b)c=d , d+(s.0)11 or d+(s.0)number (more) from 11 Process: P1 3+(.s.0)5=8+(s.0)11 , 3+(s.0)5<91 P2 5+(.0)5=5+(s.0)224 , 5+(.0)5<729 ... General form  a+(.b)c=d+(s.0)11 ,a+(s.b)c<e1 a+(.b)c=d+(s.0)e , a+(.b)c<f a+(.b)c=d+(s.0)efg , a+(.b)c<hij ... [S18]left inequality CM[S18]know _______________________________________ 2+5=7 , 2+10=12 , 2+15=17, 2+20=22 , 2+25=27 , 2+30=32 , 2+35=37 , 2+38=40, 2+40=42, 2+41=43 , 2+44=46 , 2+45=47, 2+47=49 , 2+50=52 ,2+57=59 , 2+60=62 , 2+64=66, 2+70=72, 2+71=73 , 2+78=80 , 2+80=82 , 2+85=87 , 2+90=92 ,2+92=94 srcko 5550={5,10,15,20,25,30,35,40,45,50} 38350={38,41,44,47,50} 501090={50,60,70,80,90} 50792={50,57,64,71,78,85,92} two(more) firstlast srcko 55383(_50_)1090792 remains part of the function, when we come to it 

28012012, 08:23 AM




RE: Please find a competent translator
(28012012 02:00 AM)msbiljanica Wrote:(27012012 05:56 PM)Chas Wrote: Please find a competent translator or STOP POSTING!original serbian There is not enough context and you haven't defined your terms. Are you talking about the real numbers, or about teaching math? What does 'let go of things to watch' mean? What does 'number along' mean? One understandable statement you make is simply wrong: 'all the math is really the geometry'. Not all of mathematics comes from geometry. You have it backward. Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims. Science is not a subject, but a method. 

28012012, 07:05 PM




RE: srdanova math
oh my freaking goodness... I may loose my award for this but>
Woah man, I have NO clue what you are saying. I read the whole thread, I tried to get it, I did, but it is impossible. When you make a point please don't dismiss all concerns. You are not talking to professionals here. You have to explain. And don't just go on and on and on with countless formulas and figures without explaining them to us simple minded people. If you want to have this stuff accepted (whatever it is, because I didn't understand any), publish it! >>> Please stop using Google Translator, noone understands you. You can simply post in your original language, it will have the same effect. "Freedom is the freedom to say that 2+2=4"  George Orwell (in 1984)  Wotsefack?!  

1 user Likes Leerob's post 
« Next Oldest  Next Newest »

User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)