srdanova math
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
31-01-2012, 07:50 PM
RE: srdanova math
I am a math major and when I read this, this is what I see.

P2 4-(.1)2=¤1(2)1¤ image
Part2: 4 minus 0.1 times 2 is equal to Ninja Star Shuriken times 2 times 1 times Ninja Star Shuriken image.

Makes perfect sense to me, ninjas kick ass.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes mysticjbyrd's post
31-01-2012, 09:52 PM (This post was last modified: 31-01-2012 10:00 PM by GirlyMan.)
RE: srdanova math
(30-01-2012 04:07 AM)msbiljanica Wrote:  
Quote:GirlyManHe's using his own notation without first grounding or defining it, ...
the concepts that exist in the current math notation using an existing, new things to introduce our notation ...

You need to provide compelling reason for introducing new notation. Can't be something you just happened to pull out of your ass on a Tuesday night.

Fuck the notation and symbols and equations and presuppositions. Describe what you are trying to say in your natural language and Filox has already volunteered to translate it for us.

Breathing - it's more art than science.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes GirlyMan's post
01-02-2012, 04:20 AM (This post was last modified: 01-02-2012 04:30 AM by msbiljanica.)
RE: srdanova math
(31-01-2012 07:50 PM)mysticjbyrd Wrote:  I am a math major and when I read this, this is what I see.

P2 4-(.1)2=¤1(2)1¤ image
Part2: 4 minus 0.1 times 2 is equal to Ninja Star Shuriken times 2 times 1 times Ninja Star Shuriken image.

Makes perfect sense to me, ninjas kick ass.
   
read it - the number 4 is subtracted 2, in point number 4 (.1) we obtain the gap number ¤1(2)1¤ , image (refers to a picture where the calculation is presented) Is it clear


(31-01-2012 09:52 PM)GirlyMan Wrote:  
(30-01-2012 04:07 AM)msbiljanica Wrote:  
Quote:GirlyManHe's using his own notation without first grounding or defining it, ...
the concepts that exist in the current math notation using an existing, new things to introduce our notation ...

You need to provide compelling reason for introducing new notation. Can't be something you just happened to pull out of your ass on a Tuesday night.

Fuck the notation and symbols and equations and presuppositions. Describe what you are trying to say in your natural language and Filox has already volunteered to translate it for us.
specify [Sn] is not clear to you, I will give in their own language


Presupposition-In the expression a-(.b)c=d , d+(s.0))11 or d+(s.0)number (more) from 11
and d+(.z)11¤¤e or d+(.z) number ( more ) from 11¤¤e , e={(f),(f)(f),(f)(f)(f),...}
Process:
P1 4-(.2)2=2+(s.0)11 , 4-(.2)2<31
4-(.3)2=¤1(2)1¤+(.z)11¤¤(2) , 4-(.3)2<2¤¤(2)+(.z)11¤¤(2) , 4-(.3)2<31¤¤(2)
P2 4-(.2)2=2+(s.0)4 , 4-(.2)2<6
4-(.3)2=¤1(2)1¤+(.z)7¤¤(2) , 4-(.3)2<2¤¤(2)+(.z)7¤¤(2), 4-(.3)<9¤¤(2)
...
General form - a-(.b)c=d-(s.0)11 ,a+(s.b)c<g1
a-(.b)c=d+(s.0)g , a+(.b)c<l
a-(.b)c=d+(s.0)kpg , a+(.b)c<hij ...
a-(.b)c=d+(.z)11¤¤e , a-(.b)c<s¤¤e+(.z)11¤¤e , a+(s.b)c<g1¤¤e
a-(.b)c=d+(.z)g¤¤e , a-(.b)c<s¤¤¤e+(.z)g¤¤e , a+(.b)c<l¤¤e
a-(.b)c=d+(.z)kpg¤¤e , a-(.b)c<s¤¤e+(.z)kpg¤¤e , a+(.b)c<hij¤¤e ...
[S25]-left inequality subtraction
CM-[S25]-know , forms without any gaps numbers not known
____________________________________________________________________
Presupposition-In the expression a-(.b)c=d , d-(s.0/s.0))11p or d+(s.0/s.0)number (more) from 11p
and d-(.z)11p¤¤e or d-(.z) number ( more ) from 11¤¤e , e={(f),(f)(f),(f)(f)(f),...}
Process:
P1 4-(.2)2=2-(s.0/s.0))112 , 4-(.2)2>011
4-(.3)2=¤1(2)1¤-(.z)211¤¤(2) , 4-(.3)2>2¤¤(2)-(.z)211¤¤(2) , 4-(.3)2>011¤¤(2)
P2 4-(.2)2=2-(s.0/s.0))1 , 4-(.2)2>1
4-(.3)2=¤1(2)1¤-(.z)1¤¤(2) , 4-(.3)2>2¤¤(2)-(.z)1¤¤(2) , 4-(.3)>1¤¤(2)
...
General form - a-(.b)c=d-(s.0/s.0)11p ,a-(s.b)c>g1l
a-(.b)c=d-(s.0/s.0))g , a-(.b)c>l
a-(.b)c=d-(s.0/s.0))ksg , a-(.b)c>hij ...
a-(.b)c=d-(.z)11p¤¤e , a-(.b)c>s¤¤e-(.z)11p¤¤e , a-(s.b)c>g1k¤¤e
a-(.b)c=d-(.z)g¤¤e , a-(.b)c>s¤¤e-(.z)g¤¤e , a-(.b)c>l¤¤e
a-(.b)c=d-(.z)kpg¤¤e , a-(.b)c>s¤¤e-(.z)kpg¤¤e , a-(.b)c>hij¤¤e ...
[S26]-right inequality subtraction
CM-[S26]-know , forms without any gaps numbers not known
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes msbiljanica's post
02-02-2012, 03:36 AM
RE: srdanova math
Presupposition-Two ( more) subtraction (left and right inequalities) can be short to write
Process:
P1 7-(.013)4=y , 7-(.013)4>y ,7-(.013)4<y
P2 8-(.228)5=y , 8-(.228)5>y ,8-(.228)5<y
...
General form a-(.bcd)e=y ,a-(.bcd)e>y , a-(.bcd)e<y
a-(.bcd_e)f=y , a-(.bcd_e)f>y , a-(.bcd_e)f<y ,...
[S27]-function subtraction
CM-[S27]-does no know
_____________________________________
Presupposition-Parts number (a) and mobile number (b ) have a contact , contact remains , the
rest is delete
Process:
   
P1 4 - (.0)2=2
P2 4 - (.1)2=2 image
P3 4 - (.2)2=2
P4 4 - (.3)2=1
P5 4 - (.4)2=1
General form
a - (.0)b=c
a - (.1)b=c
...
a - (.d)b=c

[S28]-opposite subtraction
CM-[S28]-does no know
-sign for. opposite subtraction (when you download the following PDF you will see how it looks)
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
02-02-2012, 04:22 PM
RE: srdanova math
will this nightmare ever stop?

[Image: 69p7qx.gif]
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 2 users Like Leela's post
02-02-2012, 08:32 PM (This post was last modified: 02-02-2012 10:26 PM by GirlyMan.)
RE: srdanova math
(01-02-2012 04:20 AM)msbiljanica Wrote:  specify [Sn] is not clear to you, I will give in their own language

Yes. All of them, please.

(02-02-2012 04:22 PM)Leela Wrote:  will this nightmare ever stop?

What you call a nightmare I call "Girly in Wonderland". I'm enjoying the hell out of it. Big Grin

Breathing - it's more art than science.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 1 user Likes GirlyMan's post
03-02-2012, 06:09 AM
RE: srdanova math
serbian -[S1],[S2] imamo matematički prostor koga ćemo objasniti pomoću prirodne duži (realne duži ) . prirodna duž je aksiom , ima svoj kraj (početak) ovo svojstvo ćemo nazvati tačka . prirodne duži mogu se spajati samo tačkama ( svojim početkom ili krajem) i ono prestavlja osnovno pravilo i zabranjuje svako drugo spajanje prirodnih duži.
[S3]-imamo samo prirodne duži i osnovno pravilo , jedinu stvar koju možemo iz ovoga napraviti je duž (od prirodne osnove , koja se spaja u smeru tačaka početne prirodne duži )
[S4],[S5]-uzećemo duž koji se prostire u svom beskonačnom obliku , tačke koje ima duž zamenućemo oznakama ( 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) ovim dobivamo brojeve ( N ) i brojevnu duž , bavićemo se odnosim u brojevnu duž ( zato se zove prirodna matematika ) , brojevi su duži ( osim broja 0 koji je tačka) i prestavljaju vredost od tačke (0) to tačke naziva samoga broja
[S6],[S7] - svaki broj ima tačke , koje možemo napisati kako se broj nalazi u brojevnoj duži ili suprotno od toga
[S8]- brojevi su međusobno mogu upoređivati da bismo znali koji je veći ili manji ili jednak , mogu se upoređivati dva ( više) brojeva međusobno
[S9]- broje se može kretati po brojevnoj duži od tačke 0 ka beskonačnosti
[S10]-posmatraćemo kada broj na brojevnoj duži i broj koji se kreće po brojevnoj duži imaju kontakt , i brojevi se spajaju , dobivamo prvu računsku operaciju sabiranje
__________________________________________________________
3.how to solve this current knowledge of mathematics:
along a (20m) ,deleted between 10 m and 15 m (b=5m) , wet get c
20m-(.5m)=¤10m(5m)5m¤
___________________________________________________
Presupposition-In the expression a - (.b)c=d , d+(s.0))11 or d+(s.0)number (more) from 11
and d+(.z)11¤¤e or d+(.z) number ( more ) from 11¤¤e , e={(f),(f)(f),(f)(f)(f),...}
Process:
P1 5 - (.0)5=5+(s.0)11 , 5 - (.0)5<61
¤2(2)2¤ - (.1)¤1(1)2¤=¤1(2)1¤+(.z)11¤¤(2)
¤2(2)2¤ - (.1)¤1(1)2¤<2¤¤(2)+(.z)11¤¤(2) , ¤2(2)2¤ - (.1)¤1/1)2¤<31¤¤(2)
P2 5 - (.0)5=5+(s.0)4 , 5 - (.0)5<9
¤2(2)2¤ - (.1)¤1(1)2¤=¤1(2)1¤+(.z)7¤¤(2)
¤2(2)2¤ - (.1)¤1(1)2)¤<2¤¤(2)+(.z)7¤¤(2), ¤2(2)2¤ - (.1)¤1(1)2¤<9¤¤(2)
...
General form a - (.b)c=d-(s.0)11 ,a - (s.b)c<g1
a - (.b)c=d+(s.0)g , a - (.b)c<l
a - (.b)c=d+(s.0)kpg , a - (.b)c<hij ...
a -(.b)c=d+(.z)11¤¤e , a - (.b)c<s¤¤e+(.z)11¤¤e , a - (s.b)c<g1¤¤e
a - (.b)c=d+(.z)g¤¤e , a - (.b)c<s¤¤¤e+(.z)g¤¤e , a - (.b)c<l¤¤e
a - (.b)c=d+(.z)kpg¤¤e , a - (.b)c<s¤¤e+(.z)kpg¤¤e , a - (.b)c<hij¤¤e ...
[S29]-left inequality opposite subtraction
CM-[S29]-does no know
________________________________-
Presupposition-In the expression a - (.b)c=d , d-(s.0/s.0))11p or d+(s.0/s.0)number (more) from
11p and d-(.z)11p¤¤e or d-(.z) number ( more ) from 11¤¤e , e={(f),(f)(f),(f)(f)(f),...}
Process:
P1 5 - (.0)5=5 -(s.0/s.0))115 , 5 - (.0)5>014
¤2(2)2¤ - (.1)¤1(1)2¤=¤1(2)1¤-(.z)211¤¤(2)
¤2(2)2¤ - (.1)¤1(1)2¤>2¤¤(2)-(.z)211¤¤(2) , 4¤2(2)¤ - (.1)¤1(1)2¤>011¤¤(2)
P2 5 - (.0)5=5-(s.0/s.0))1 , 5 - (.0)5>1
¤2(2)2¤ - (.1)¤1(1)2¤=¤1(2)1¤-(.z)1¤¤(2)
¤2(2)2¤ - (.1)¤1(1)2¤>2¤¤(2)-(.z)1¤¤(2) , ¤2(2)2¤ - (.1)¤1(1)2¤>1¤¤(2)
...
General form a - (.b)c=d-(s.0/s.0)11p ,a - (s.b)c>g1l
a - (.b)c=d-(s.0/s.0))g , a - (.b)c>l
a - (.b)c=d-(s.0/s.0))ksg , a - (.b)c>hij ...
a - (.b)c=d-(.z)11p¤¤e , a - (.b)c>s¤¤e-(.z)11p¤¤e , a - (s.b)c>g1k¤¤e
a - (.b)c=d-(.z)g¤¤e , a - (.b)c>s¤¤e-(.z)g¤¤e , a - (.b)c>l¤¤e
a - (.b)c=d-(.z)kpg¤¤e , a - (.b)c>s¤¤e-(.z)kpg¤¤e , a - (.b)c>hij¤¤e ...
[S30]-right inequality opposite subtraction
CM-[S30]-does no know
______________________________--
PDF - http://www.mediafire.com/?qle11bvr2yuey9o
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
03-02-2012, 06:22 AM
Just stop this nonsense
Please get a competent translator to present an overview of your idea.

Until then, please just stop this fucking nonsense.

Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
[Image: flagstiny%206.gif]
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
03-02-2012, 06:14 PM
RE: Just stop this nonsense
(03-02-2012 06:22 AM)Chas Wrote:  Please get a competent translator to present an overview of your idea.

(03-02-2012 06:09 AM)msbiljanica Wrote:  serbian -[S1],[S2] imamo matematički prostor koga ćemo objasniti pomoću prirodne duži (realne duži ) . prirodna duž je aksiom , ima svoj kraj (početak) ovo svojstvo ćemo nazvati tačka . prirodne duži mogu se spajati samo tačkama ( svojim početkom ili krajem) i ono prestavlja osnovno pravilo i zabranjuje svako drugo spajanje prirodnih duži.
[S3]-imamo samo prirodne duži i osnovno pravilo , jedinu stvar koju možemo iz ovoga napraviti je duž (od prirodne osnove , koja se spaja u smeru tačaka početne prirodne duži )
[S4],[S5]-uzećemo duž koji se prostire u svom beskonačnom obliku , tačke koje ima duž zamenućemo oznakama ( 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) ovim dobivamo brojeve ( N ) i brojevnu duž , bavićemo se odnosim u brojevnu duž ( zato se zove prirodna matematika ) , brojevi su duži ( osim broja 0 koji je tačka) i prestavljaju vredost od tačke (0) to tačke naziva samoga broja
[S6],[S7] - svaki broj ima tačke , koje možemo napisati kako se broj nalazi u brojevnoj duži ili suprotno od toga
[S8]- brojevi su međusobno mogu upoređivati da bismo znali koji je veći ili manji ili jednak , mogu se upoređivati dva ( više) brojeva međusobno
[S9]- broje se može kretati po brojevnoj duži od tačke 0 ka beskonačnosti
[S10]-posmatraćemo kada broj na brojevnoj duži i broj koji se kreće po brojevnoj duži imaju kontakt , i brojevi se spajaju , dobivamo prvu računsku operaciju sabiranje

Calling Filox, help us out here brother.

(03-02-2012 06:22 AM)Chas Wrote:  Until then, please just stop this fucking nonsense.

Why you let this irritate you, Chas?

Breathing - it's more art than science.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
03-02-2012, 06:18 PM
RE: Just stop this nonsense
(03-02-2012 06:14 PM)GirlyMan Wrote:  
(03-02-2012 06:22 AM)Chas Wrote:  Please get a competent translator to present an overview of your idea.
(03-02-2012 06:22 AM)Chas Wrote:  Until then, please just stop this fucking nonsense.

Why you let this irritate you, Chas?

Because he just doesn't listen. I also yell at the TV, especially the news.

Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
[Image: flagstiny%206.gif]
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 2 users Like Chas's post
Post Reply
Forum Jump: