srdanova math
Post Reply
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
03-02-2012, 07:29 PM
RE: Just stop this nonsense
(03-02-2012 06:18 PM)Chas Wrote:  
(03-02-2012 06:14 PM)GirlyMan Wrote:  
(03-02-2012 06:22 AM)Chas Wrote:  Please get a competent translator to present an overview of your idea.
(03-02-2012 06:22 AM)Chas Wrote:  Until then, please just stop this fucking nonsense.

Why you let this irritate you, Chas?

Because he just doesn't listen. I also yell at the TV, especially the news.

Fair enough then.

As it was in the beginning is now and ever shall be, world without end. Amen.
And I will show you something different from either
Your shadow at morning striding behind you
Or your shadow at evening rising to meet you;
I will show you fear in a handful of dust.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
04-02-2012, 10:33 AM
RE: srdanova math
Presupposition-Two ( more) opposite subtraction (left and right inequalities) can be short to write
Process:
P1 7 - (.013)4=y , 7 - (.013)4>y ,7 - (.013)4<y
P2 8 - (.228)5=y , 8 - (.228)5>y ,8 - (.228)5<y
...
General form a - (.bcd)e=y ,a - (.bcd)e>y , a - (.bcd)e<y
a - (.bcd_e)f=y , a - (.bcd_e)f>y , a - (.bcd_e)f<y ,...
[S31]-function opposite subtraction
CM-[S31]-does no know
__________________________________
Presupposition-Two ( more) addition the same number can be written in shorted form
Process:
P1 a+(s.c)a=a×(s.c)2 , a×(s.c)b
P2 a+(s.c)a+(s.c)a=a×(s.c)3 , a×(s.c)b
P3 a+(s.c)a+(s.c)a+(s.c)a=a×(s.c)4 , a×(s.c)b
...
[S32]-multiplication
CM-[S32]-know , axiom
Presupposition-In terms a×(s.c)b , b can be number 0 (1)
Process:
P1 a×(s.c)0
P2 a×(s.c)1
[S32a]-multiplication-amendment
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
05-02-2012, 08:13 AM
RE: srdanova math
Presupposition-In terms a×(s.c)b , multiplication
Process:
P1 4×(s.0)4=16
P2 4×(s.1)4=13 image
P3 4×(s.2)4=10
P4 4×(s.3)4=7
P5 4×(s.4)4=4
   

P1 ¤1(2)1¤×(s.0)4=¤1(2)2(2)2(2)2(2)1¤
P2 ¤1(2)1¤×(s.1)4=¤1(2)1(2)1(2)1(2)1¤ image
P3 ¤1(2)1¤×(s.2)4=¤1(1)6(1)1¤
P4 ¤1(2)1¤×(s.3)4=7
P5 ¤1(2)1¤×(s.4)4=¤1(2)1¤
   
General form
a×(s.0)b=c
a×(s.1)b=c
...
a×(c.d)b=c

[S32b]-multiplication
CM-[S32b]-know a×(s.0)b other do not know , forms withuut any gaps numbers not known
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
05-02-2012, 10:59 PM
RE: srdanova math
[Image: MathReligion.gif]

Welcome to science. You're gonna like it here - Phil Plait

Have you ever tried taking a comfort blanket away from a small child? - DLJ
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[+] 4 users Like robotworld's post
06-02-2012, 10:39 AM
RE: srdanova math
PDF - http://www.mediafire.com/?ffy4ravu1gw4xkd
___________________________________________
Presupposition-The numbers are multiplication , where a contact is deleted
Process:
P1 4 × (s.0)4=¤4(0)4(0)4(0)4¤
P2 4 × (s.1)4=¤3(1)2(1)2(1)3¤ image
P3 4 × (s.2)4=¤2(6)2¤
P4 4 × (s.3)4=¤1(5)1¤
P5 4 × (s.4)4=0
   
General form
a × (s.0)b=c
a × (s.1)b=c
...
a × (c.d)b=c

[S29]-multiplication subtraction
CM-[S29]-does no know
×You will see a sign in the PDF
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
07-02-2012, 02:09 AM
RE: srdanova math
(06-02-2012 10:39 AM)msbiljanica Wrote:  PDF - http://www.mediafire.com/?ffy4ravu1gw4xkd
___________________________________________
Presupposition-The numbers are multiplication , where a contact is deleted
Process:
P1 4 × (s.0)4=¤4(0)4(0)4(0)4¤
P2 4 × (s.1)4=¤3(1)2(1)2(1)3¤ image
P3 4 × (s.2)4=¤2(6)2¤
P4 4 × (s.3)4=¤1(5)1¤
P5 4 × (s.4)4=0

General form
a × (s.0)b=c
a × (s.1)b=c
...
a × (c.d)b=c

[S29]-multiplication subtraction
CM-[S29]-does no know
×You will see a sign in the PDF

Still lost at you point...
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
07-02-2012, 08:50 AM
RE: srdanova math
Presupposition-The numbers are multiplication , contact remains the rest is deleted
Process:
P1 4 × (s.0)4=0
P2 4 × (s.1)4=¤1(2)1(2)1¤ image
P3 4 × (s.2)4=6
P4 4 × (s.3)4=5
P5 4 × (s.4)4=4
   
General form
a × (s.0)b=c
a ×(s.1)b=c
...
a × (s.d)b=c

[S30]-multiplication opposite subtraction
CM-[S30]-does no know
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
07-02-2012, 09:18 AM
RE: srdanova math
I have a BA in math and I don't understand a single word/symbol of what you are writing... msbiljanica have you also google translated your math? That would explain a lot. You need to take 8-10 steps back and start with the basics and explain in detail what the fuck you are talking about. Your notation makes no sense. For your convenience I will Google translate this for you, so you can see it is no fucking help to do so. But of course you won't be able to understand the translation, because google translate is shit.

google translation:
Имам дипломирао математику и ја не разумем једну реч / симбол онога што пише ... мсбиљаница имате и Гоогле превести вашу математику? То би објаснило доста. Треба да се предузму кораке 8-10 назад и почети са основама, а детаљно објасните шта јеботе причате. Ваша нотација нема смисла. Ради ваше удобности сам ће Гоогле транслате то за вас, тако да можете да видите да није јебени помоћи да то учине. Али, наравно, нећете бити у стању да разумеју језик, јер је Гоогле Транслате је срање.
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
08-02-2012, 03:55 AM
RE: srdanova math
(07-02-2012 09:18 AM)Jakel Wrote:  I have a BA in math and I don't understand a single word/symbol of what you are writing... msbiljanica have you also google translated your math? That would explain a lot. You need to take 8-10 steps back and start with the basics and explain in detail what the fuck you are talking about. Your notation makes no sense. For your convenience I will Google translate this for you, so you can see it is no fucking help to do so. But of course you won't be able to understand the translation, because google translate is shit.
I understand you correctly using google translator
mathematics is, in fact, all the geometry (the current math, my math), and represents what you see as the ratio of two (more) geometrical object
natural axiom - is starting natural along, what is the point, basic rule applies to the relations of the two (more) natural long, so I used pictures that gave the first geometric object (natural along, point)- question whether you understand this ?
a question for you? have two (more) natural long as the basic rule that you create a new geometric object in space - the first proof of [S3]
watch along the infinite, a point that has changed along with the symbols (0), (0.1) ... (0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9), ... this we get a new geometric object (the numbers along, a set of natural numbers - these two objects are identical, the numbers do not serve us to draw along) [S4] , [S5] -everything that follows deals with the relationship alongs and point (number - geometric objects) in number along
whether you understand?
each along the (number) number along a point, that can be marked as the number along or conversely [S6] , [S7]
alongs and points (numbers) can move number along , we get mobile number [S8]
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
08-02-2012, 07:56 AM
RE: srdanova math
Presupposition-Three (more) merger (multiplication )
Process:
P1 5×(s.3ß3)5=¤1(1)1¤ - image
P2 5×(s.4ß3)5=¤1(3)1¤ - image
5×(s.4ß4)5=¤1(1)1¤ -image
5×(s.4ß5)5=1- image
P3 5×(s.5ß5)=5
   
General form
a#(s.1ß3)b=c
a#(s.2ßd)b=c
...
a#(s.eßf)b=c , #- calculation operations (×,...)

[S31]-srki
CM-[S31]-does no know
Find all posts by this user
Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply
Forum Jump: