thinking about you
|
|
|
23-09-2014, 03:16 PM
|
||||
|
||||
RE: thinking about you
(23-09-2014 03:12 PM)dirtstar Wrote:(22-09-2014 09:51 AM)theonewhocries Wrote: I am not going to try to persuade you to change your view points but I wanted to let you know that I am praying for you and how you will find your way to the right path. You should have read through the responses before writing all that (it probably would have been quicker). He/she has basically admitted to being a troll, and is not actually praying for anyone. |
||||
23-09-2014, 03:20 PM
|
||||
|
||||
RE: thinking about you
Did I already say shoo fly to the op?
It's been so long I can't recall.... But as if to knock me down, reality came around And without so much as a mere touch, cut me into little pieces |
||||
![]() |
23-09-2014, 03:23 PM
|
||||
|
||||
RE: thinking about you
(23-09-2014 02:21 PM)theonewhocries Wrote:(23-09-2014 11:53 AM)RobbyPants Wrote: So, you're saying your post here is you doing something deviant, and you're just studying our reactions? Hmm... ![]() So, is your paper on deviance itself or rather, on the fomenting nature of deviance? ![]() A new type of thinking is essential if mankind is to survive and move to higher levels. ~ Albert Einstein |
||||
![]() |
23-09-2014, 03:26 PM
|
||||
|
||||
RE: thinking about you
(23-09-2014 03:20 PM)Momsurroundedbyboys Wrote: Did I already say shoo fly to the op? You did but it won't listen! ![]() " Generally speaking, the errors in religion are dangerous; those in philosophy only ridiculous." David Hume |
||||
23-09-2014, 03:30 PM
|
||||
|
||||
RE: thinking about you
(23-09-2014 02:21 PM)theonewhocries Wrote: no I am agnostic an agnostic who is praying for us? What the actual fuck? Shoo fly!!!!!! But as if to knock me down, reality came around And without so much as a mere touch, cut me into little pieces |
||||
23-09-2014, 03:32 PM
|
||||
|
||||
RE: thinking about you
(23-09-2014 03:12 PM)dirtstar Wrote:(22-09-2014 09:51 AM)theonewhocries Wrote: I am not going to try to persuade you to change your view points but I wanted to let you know that I am praying for you and how you will find your way to the right path. Ok so can I have my time back since the OP was full of shit? |
||||
23-09-2014, 03:36 PM
|
||||
|
||||
RE: thinking about you
Quote:You should have read through the responses before writing all that (it probably would have been quicker). He/she has basically admitted to being a troll, and is not actually praying for anyone. I know but I hate that because by the time I get to the last reply everyone has already stated what I wanted to say. ![]() |
||||
![]() |
23-09-2014, 03:59 PM
|
||||
|
||||
RE: thinking about you
(23-09-2014 03:36 PM)dirtstar Wrote:Quote:You should have read through the responses before writing all that (it probably would have been quicker). He/she has basically admitted to being a troll, and is not actually praying for anyone. I have the same problem. It is why you see I have liked almost 1,000 posts and yet have posted less than 200 times. I've recently started contributing my opinion, anyway. Edit: Apparently I surpassed 200 posts and didn't realize it. Yay me. "If there's a single thing that life teaches us, it's that wishing doesn't make it so." - Lev Grossman |
||||
![]() |
23-09-2014, 05:03 PM
|
||||
|
||||
RE: thinking about you
(23-09-2014 02:21 PM)theonewhocries Wrote:(23-09-2014 11:53 AM)RobbyPants Wrote: So, you're saying your post here is you doing something deviant, and you're just studying our reactions? So, how'd we do? It'd be fun to see how the results would be skewed if Taq were still posting here. |
||||
![]() |
23-09-2014, 06:02 PM
|
||||
|
||||
RE: thinking about you
(23-09-2014 02:21 PM)theonewhocries Wrote: no I am agnostic and to RobbyPants yes that's it I present it tomorrow making PowerPoint now. I'd be quite interested to see the results. What's your original hypothesis, btw? Presumably something about in-group-ness and whether a minority group's auto-immune system responds more or less aggressively than groups who have the comfort factor of being perceived as the majority. I'd be more interested in how 'authority' deals with deviance (or potential deviance) rather than the individuals within the group. For this, I would, before posting anything, contact a forum's leadership and ask permission to do the experiment. So the test would about governance and whether it was designed to protect/encourage the minority opinion or to protect from the minority opinion. I'm pretty sure the Management team here would have said "fill yer boots, son". ![]() |
||||
![]() |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)