why i don`t think bigfoot is in any way real
|
|
|
17-11-2012, 10:54 AM
|
||||
|
||||
RE: why i don`t think bigfoot is in any way real
You people have no idea what you're talking about.
![]() ![]() And yes, that is a direct quote. A new type of thinking is essential if mankind is to survive and move to higher levels. ~ Albert Einstein |
||||
![]() |
17-11-2012, 01:50 PM
|
||||
|
||||
RE: why i don`t think bigfoot is in any way real
(17-11-2012 04:57 AM)dj-hato Wrote: these are the reasons 1) There is much volcanic soil in the Pacific Northwest. This means that carcasses decay at a faster rate than normal. 2) The Pacific Northwest is much larger and much more untraveled than people seem to realize. The place is massive. There is plenty of space in which a group of primates can live without detection; especially when they're intentionally elusive. 3) How can we know if sleeping dens, grass-beds and forcefully-broken tree branches (at heights too great for most other animals to reach) are not from a massive ape-like creature? There are such "marks" in the forest(s), and we can't say, definitively, what caused them. This makes an ape at least possible. 4) The Patterson/Gimlin footage has been closely analized and picked apart numerous times over the years. Computer models have been constructed to analize the way in which "Patty" - the supposed sasquatch in the video - walks and moves. All tests have repeatedly shown that it could not have been a person in a suit. Additionally, there are blood and hair samples on record which show DNA not matching any known indigenous species (relative to the places from which they've been collected). With these being the case, it's a bit soon to be saying that you "almost certainly know" that Bigfoot doesn't exist. Contrary to what you say, there are things to suggest that he does, and there are few reasons other than "it's unlikely" or "probably not" to suggest that he doesn't. At the most, one should be "agnostic" - if you will - about his existence. Evidence is showing that it is at least possible. What you personally (rather than empirically) believe after that point is up to you. Through profound pain comes profound knowledge. Ridi, Pagliaccio, sul tuo amore infranto! Ridi del duol, che t'avvelena il cor! |
||||
![]() |
17-11-2012, 01:58 PM
|
||||
|
||||
RE: why i don`t think bigfoot is in any way real
(17-11-2012 01:50 PM)Misanthropik Wrote:can you link me to those findings so i can examine the data and the sources my self(17-11-2012 04:57 AM)dj-hato Wrote: these are the reasons |
||||
17-11-2012, 02:38 PM
(This post was last modified: 17-11-2012 02:56 PM by Bucky Ball.)
|
||||
|
||||
RE: why i don`t think bigfoot is in any way real
(17-11-2012 01:58 PM)dj-hato Wrote:(17-11-2012 01:50 PM)Misanthropik Wrote: 1) There is much volcanic soil in the Pacific Northwest. This means that carcasses decay at a faster rate than normal.can you link me to those findings so i can examine the data and the sources my self 1. What other carcasses have been noted to be "missing" from the samples of those looked at for "fast decay", if "volcanic soil" is the problem. Are ALL other carcasses noted to be decaying faster up there ? How do we know that ? 2. What other "intentionally elusssive" massive primates have been found, and why and how would the evolution of "elusiveness" promoted their survival in the millions of years before the advent of h Sapiens ? What other hominid species evolved "elusiveness" as it's evolutionary strategy ? WHy would a massive primate need to evolve "elusiveness" before h Sapiens arrived ? 3. What exactly does "heights too great for most other animals to reach" mean, and why can't other creatures get "up there" ? What ARE the "most other animals" that can't get up there? WHat animals CAN get "up there" ? 4. What exactly did the DNA show ? Was it a hominid, or what percentage of the DNA in the sample found was hominid, or what other species did it most closely resemble ? Has a possible "divergence" point, based on the DNA mutations/differences from the other great apes been proposed ? Insufferable know-it-all. ![]() |
||||
![]() |
17-11-2012, 02:49 PM
|
||||
|
||||
why i don`t think bigfoot is in any way real
Maybe they're the lost tribes of Israel, or perhaps remnant Nephilim. I like to think they're survivors of a branch of Homo Erecti.
![]() It was just a fucking apple man, we're sorry okay? Please stop the madness ![]() ~Izel |
||||
17-11-2012, 02:56 PM
|
||||
|
||||
RE: why i don`t think bigfoot is in any way real
(17-11-2012 02:49 PM)Erxomai Wrote: Maybe they're the lost tribes of Israel, or perhaps remnant Nephilim. I like to think they're survivors of a branch of Homo Erecti. Wouldn't you think it's just Canadian girls who haven't shaved their backs? ![]() Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims. Science is not a subject, but a method. ![]() |
||||
17-11-2012, 02:57 PM
|
||||
|
||||
why i don`t think bigfoot is in any way real
(17-11-2012 02:56 PM)Chas Wrote:(17-11-2012 02:49 PM)Erxomai Wrote: Maybe they're the lost tribes of Israel, or perhaps remnant Nephilim. I like to think they're survivors of a branch of Homo Erecti. You make a strong argument. ![]() It was just a fucking apple man, we're sorry okay? Please stop the madness ![]() ~Izel |
||||
17-11-2012, 03:01 PM
|
||||
|
||||
RE: why i don`t think bigfoot is in any way real
(17-11-2012 02:49 PM)Erxomai Wrote: Maybe they're the lost tribes of Israel, or perhaps remnant Nephilim. I like to think they're survivors of a branch of Homo Erecti.Some day archaeologists are going to find packging for Viagra/Cialis and think "hmm, they seem to have 'optimistically' labeled themselves". ![]() Insufferable know-it-all. ![]() |
||||
17-11-2012, 03:30 PM
(This post was last modified: 17-11-2012 03:34 PM by Misanthropik.)
|
||||
|
||||
RE: why i don`t think bigfoot is in any way real
1) http://agriinfo.in/?page=topic&superid=5&topicid=170 http://www.or.nrcs.usda.gov/pnw_soil/index.html
2) Sorry, I can't find any linkable source that directly addresses information about the uninhabited regions of the Pacific Northwest. They can be found somewhere, but it'll take time to find them and I'm not gonna do all of your homework for you ![]() 3) I really need to link a source to confirm that grass-beds, large dens and forecibly broken branches exist? If we were talking about the existence/non-existence of deer, you'd accept that these things are found in the woods without a problem. Go hunting some weekend. 4) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MKUwdHex1Zs http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mcmW_D4p4U0 Another good source would be "Sasquatch: Legend Meets Science" by Dr. Jeff Meldrum. It's an information-filled, but very boring read. Painfully precise and in-depth scientific analysis throughout; while I prefer a good spooky story when it comes to Bigfoot. lol Does Bigfoot exist? As others generally say: probably not. Certainly no reasonable person would bet a testicle on it. But as unlikely as he may be, there doesn't seem (as of yet) to be any real reason to believe that he doesn't exist. So, sasquatch-related agnosticism is the most healthy route, in my view. Edit: Also, http://www.scp-wiki.net/scp-1000 If that doesn't convince you, I simply don't know what will. (jk) ![]() Through profound pain comes profound knowledge. Ridi, Pagliaccio, sul tuo amore infranto! Ridi del duol, che t'avvelena il cor! |
||||
![]() |
17-11-2012, 04:17 PM
|
||||
|
||||
RE: why i don`t think bigfoot is in any way real
(17-11-2012 03:30 PM)Misanthropik Wrote: 4) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MKUwdHex1Zs http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mcmW_D4p4U0I don't have access to these vids right now, could someone tell me about them? I want to know about the DNA evidence, specifically. I have no trouble considering an upright hominid like creature might be able to exist on the planet without us knowing about it, but I also think that if we find one, it's probably not quite our old friend Sa'tch. Maybe it is a species of bear we're not aware of... a really shy bear. And probably not as big as "eye witnesses" have perceived. I was held up at gunpoint once; I can assure you the gun most certainly did look like a cannon. It was actually quite small... in fact, at first I thought it was a toy. ![]() Our Winters have been pretty mild lately here in Kansas, while up north they've been buggers. Perhaps I'll get to see the Sasquatch migration reroute into Kansas. I've already witnessed the new and improved migratory pattern of the Armadillo up from Texas. I need a BigFoot to balance it out. ![]() A new type of thinking is essential if mankind is to survive and move to higher levels. ~ Albert Einstein |
||||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)