Blog Home

▣ Baby Jesus For Ransom

posted by The Thinking Atheist on December 20th, 2009 at 3:46 PM

15 Comments added to this post

Some thoughts about the biblical nativity story
Baby Jesus For Ransom


I was driving with some friends the other night, and we came upon a cluster of police cars, lights flashing, surrounding a vehicle in front of a church.

On the church lawn was a small nativity scene. Joseph. Mary. And a cradle.

An empty cradle.

The baby Jesus was missing. So…we surmised that the perp must’ve been some mischievous kids trying to steal Christ from the manger.

Which begs the question: What, exactly, would you do with a stolen baby Jesus? Were they simply trying to finish out their own nativity display without having to pay for the plastic child? Would they prop it up in an apartment or dorm room as a gag? Or were they gonna hold Jesus for ransom? You know…call the church and extort some offering money for the return of the savior?

Yeah, that's kinda "out there." But no more "out there" than the story of the nativity itself.

Only two gospels even mention Christ’s birth, and they were written more than a generation after Jesus’ death. The accounts of the biblical nativity are also wildly contradictory. A few examples

* The book of Matthew has 28 generations between David and the birth of Jesus. Luke has 41 generations for the same period.

* Matthew says Jesus’ grandfather (on Joseph’s side) is Jacob, while Luke says the grandfather is Heli.

* Matthew 1:20 says the angel appeared to Joseph. Luke 1:28 says the angel appeared before Mary.

* If you believe the bible, you believe that Mary traveled 60 miles to Bethlehem over rough terrain while 9 months pregnant. Ask any woman who has experienced the ninth month of pregnancy about that one.

* Matthew 2:11 says Jesus’ birth took place in a house. Luke’s account says manger (feeding trough), because there was no room in the inn.

* Matthew 2:13-16 says Mary and Joseph fled to Egypt to escape Herod’s wrath. Luke 2:39 says Mary and Joseph returned to Nazareth, with no mention of Herod, a death decree or Egypt.

* The book of Luke says that John The Baptist was a relative of Jesus and knew he was the divine Christ, even in the womb (Luke 1:41,44). But in the same book (Luke 7:19-23), the adult John The Baptist didn’t know who Jesus was.

* And the virgin birth? Not so much. Matthew apparently misread the Greek Septuagint of Isaiah 7:14, (mistranslating the Hebrew word “almah,” which doesn’t mean “virgin.” It translates, “young woman of marriageable age” or “young maiden.”) The virginity angle was mostly likely added to the story because, culturally, it was often claimed that important people had miraculous births. Plato was said to be the offspring of the god Apollo. Alexander The Great was said to have been conceived when a thunderbolt impregnated his mother, Olympias. Buddha’s birth story includes elephants in the sky. Confucius has dragons in the Heavens.

* The three kings? In the book of Matthew, they were magoi (astronomers), not kings. There’s no mention of “three,” and the entire account contradicts Luke’s account, which has Jesus being visited by local shepherds.

* The December 25th birth date? Well…Jesus certainly wasn’t born in wintertime, because Bethlehem shepherds would only be tending flocks from mid-March to mid-November, never during the cold mid-winter season. The early Romans celebrated “Natalis Invicti” (birthday of the sun) on December 25th as a Winter Solstice festival, so it’s likely that Christians claimed the date of this pagan holiday as their own. (Research the Christmas tree if you’d like to learn about another pagan tradition.)



I doubt the mischievous vandals were considering any of this when they did a “smash and grab” of the plastic Savior Baby.

I also doubt that the church that erected the display has done any real thinking about the Nativity Story that the display represents. To them, it’s tradition. It’s true. It’s safe. It’s comforting. After all, who wouldn’t want to “sleep in heavenly peace.”

We should all be motivated to know why we embrace our traditions and beliefs. We should all seek truth, including the hard truth.

And we should all be on the lookout for a small, plastic baby Jesus. About 26 inches long, with blue eyes, white “swaddled” attire and a 110-volt electrical plug coming out of his feet.

I know a church that’s lookin’.

-Ed

Comments

Piddler says:

An excellent rendering of biblical contradictions can be found in professor Randel Helms' most interesting book, The Bible Against Itself.

August 27th, 2010 at 9:00 PM

Piddler says:

An excellent rendering of biblical contradictions can be found in professor Randel Helms' most interesting book, The Bible Against Itself.

August 27th, 2010 at 8:58 PM

George Collins says:

:) This helped alot when it comes to trying to explain myself. That's funny how the bible just clashes with itself.

March 28th, 2010 at 8:21 PM

Marty says:

Einstein taught us that "energy cannot be created or destroyed". Humans are made of nothing more that atoms which are packets of energy. Even are thoughts are energy and science is beginning to measure their force. Perhaps we are the Creator together as One beyond time and space and all of the other illusions that we love play at.

March 18th, 2010 at 9:58 AM

Rain says:

Actually, if you want to know the origins of the nativity story, watch part 1 of the documentary, "Zeitgeist". It's all a re-hashed astrological myth.

March 17th, 2010 at 4:56 PM

Ralph Webb says:

Since religions have obviously failed when it comes to treating others with dignity and respect, why don't we just cut through the chase and start helping each other as much as we can. Any time you can help someone without any hurt to yourself, just do it. That's all I got.

March 15th, 2010 at 5:07 PM

Ralph Webb says:

Since religions have obviously failed when it comes to treating others with dignity and respect, why don't we just cut through the chase and start helping each other as much as we can. Any time you can help someone without any hurt to yourself, just do it. That's all I got.

March 15th, 2010 at 5:07 PM

marco says:

such vandalism. kids will be kids. the church follows what it wants to follow. meh i don't agree with much of roman catholic church so i left it. I follow Logic and reason now. You may call me a Pearlist

March 10th, 2010 at 1:33 PM

Michael says:

Don't forget Matthew's emphasis placed on the three sets of fourteen generations. Maybe that's why his geneology is missing a couple of generations when compared to the old testiment geneologies. (Intentional deception in the Bible?)
Another point from Dan Ehrman's work is Matthew only lists 41 generations not 42. One name, I think, gets tallied twice at the end of one group then added again at the beginning of another.
Also good to remember the first people to ever die for Jesus....... all the infant and toddler boys. (Moses like spin to the story?) Not suppported by any other historical documents of the time from what I've heard. So a god with the power to intervene, the knowledge to intervene, and the values to intervene apparantly let the innocent children be killed. I guess it didn't matter for these kids to die in order to show how special jesus was.

March 9th, 2010 at 11:39 PM

Michael says:

Don't forget Matthew's emphasis placed on the three sets of fourteen generations. Maybe that's why his geneology is missing a couple of generations when compared to the old testiment geneologies. (Intentional deception in the Bible?)
Another point from Dan Ehrman's work is Matthew only lists 41 generations not 42. One name, I think, gets tallied twice at the end of one group then added again at the beginning of another.
Also good to remember the first people to ever die for Jesus....... all the infant and toddler boys. (Moses like spin to the story?) Not suppported by any other historical documents of the time from what I've heard. So a god with the power to intervene, the knowledge to intervene, and the values to intervene apparantly let the innocent children be killed. I guess it didn't matter for these kids to die in order to show how special jesus was.

March 9th, 2010 at 11:38 PM

peter says:

good post!

February 12th, 2010 at 3:47 AM

raies says:

well the thing is that the bible has been corrupted but it does not mean that it was not the word of God, so what is authentic in the bible you have to check it up with the qur'an the last testament of God.

February 10th, 2010 at 2:56 AM

Dave Harper says:

The familiar image of the nativity scene is etched into our brains like the image of a fair skinned, light haired, and blue eyed Jesus who is never depicted smiling. This absurd distortion displayed all over the U.S. during the Christmas season is further evidence that believers care very little about the real history of the person they worship and would just as easily regard a little lifeless plastic doll as sacred. It is no less obnoxious than the image of Jesus being tortured and executed that the "faithful" seem only too delighted to obsess on ad nauseam.

January 30th, 2010 at 4:52 PM

Nahuel says:

Very nice. Although here, in Argentina, it's the tradition to leave the cradle empty until christmas, when he's born. So, pretty much all cradles in nativity scenes are empty and we wouldn't think someone stole baby jesus.

January 3rd, 2010 at 2:40 PM

frank says:

And don't forget it's a white baby jesus becouse everyone knows jesus was white!!like everyone in the middle east LOL! keep up the good work and thank You

December 26th, 2009 at 2:01 PM

Add a comment

Name:
Email: (Will not be displayed)
Website:
Comments:
  Verify the contents of this image in the box provided above to successfully submit this form
Verify Post:
Input the text from the image above to verify this post
 

Blog Home

Home | What We Believe | Refuting The Bible | You Are Not Alone | User Forum | Related News | Atheist Resources | Editors Blog | Contact Us